I've been told that the remote side is a Sonicwall TZ170, firmware SonicOS
Enhanced 3.1.0.7-4e.
I'm going to keep monkeying with the configuration to see if I can get it
to work.
Thanks!
On 9/30/05, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sonicwall firmware version?
I have a spare
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Peter Bako wrote:
I have a situation where I need to connect an OpenBSD box to a MS Windows
PPTP server (yep, I know it is not secure, but in this case I have no choice
in the matter).
After looking around the net I found myself at
http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/.
Does open BSD support Trunking as Sun calls it, or Etherchannel as Cisco calls
it.
Or aggregating seperate Ethernet cards to increase bandwidth and provide
rendundancy as I call it ?
I have seen the queston asked on the list but never answered.
In pf nat rules also the first match wins
__but__
in pf filter rules the __last__ match wins.
In fact that is the one thing I don't like in pf, but to have a first
match win you can use the magic word quick in all your pass and block
rules. (e.g pass in quick)
And thereby end up with yards of
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 08:18:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does open BSD support Trunking as Sun calls it, or Etherchannel as
Cisco calls it. Or aggregating seperate Ethernet cards to increase
bandwidth and provide rendundancy as I call it ?
Yes, trunk(4). It's in 3.8.
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 04:43:40 -0500, Travis H. wrote:
In pf nat rules also the first match wins
__but__
in pf filter rules the __last__ match wins.
In fact that is the one thing I don't like in pf, but to have a first
match win you can use the magic word quick in all your pass and block
rules.
We have a few evo t20 at school that are unused so I planned to take
one home and prepare it for diskless.
I've had diskless working flawless with a generic pc as terminal and
obsd as terminal server.
But these t20's seem made for WinXP so there's something in the flash
that tries to boot winxp.
Does open BSD support Trunking as Sun calls it, or Etherchannel as
Cisco calls it.
Or aggregating seperate Ethernet cards to increase bandwidth and
provide rendundancy as I call it ?
I have seen the queston asked on the list but never answered.
trunk(4) will be in 3.8.
/jtm
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:17:11PM +0200, Jens Teglhus Mxller wrote:
Does open BSD support Trunking as Sun calls it, or Etherchannel as
Cisco calls it.
Or aggregating seperate Ethernet cards to increase bandwidth and
provide rendundancy as I call it ?
I have seen the queston asked on
The MetaStore is at this point essentially complete, save for content.
There are links on the page to assist in populating it. There are
about 20 pieces of hardware featured on this: IT NEEDS MORE.
I have received several bits and pieces of information, but to make
this more useful, I need even
--On 01 October 2005 04:43 -0500, Travis H. wrote:
Ah, but the matching engine doesn't have to traverse the whole rule
list that way. Unless pf is doing something really tricky, every
packet will have to traverse every firewall rule without use of
quicks.
huh? Before any rules are evaluated,
huh? Before any rules are evaluated, the filter checks whether the
packet matches any state. If it does, the packet is passed without
evaluation of any rules. - pf.conf(5)
Yeah, I neglected stateful matching. I should have said that every
packet that has to run the gauntlet of rules, has to
--On 01 October 2005 08:50 -0500, Travis H. wrote:
huh? Before any rules are evaluated, the filter checks whether the
packet matches any state. If it does, the packet is passed without
evaluation of any rules. - pf.conf(5)
Yeah, I neglected stateful matching. I should have said that every
Travis H. wrote:
Yeah, I neglected stateful matching. I should have said that every
packet that has to run the gauntlet of rules, has to run all of them.
Not necessarily. Search for pf and skip-steps, something that isn't
documented much inside OpenBSD, because it is always on and being
I helped a friend setup a firewall environment years ago in front of his
web business, first it was on IPF(back when OpenBSD shipped w/IPF), then
PF. Amazingly he's managed to keep his business up, running and growing
through the dot-bomb period, but I digress.
Once I configured PF on his
Hi
With the risk of making a complete fool of myself..
Is it possible
to get K3B running on OpenBSD 3.7?
I am running KDE as the desktop, I
have tried to install K3B from source without succes. Make fails with
errors.
Having no prior experience in using FreeBSD binaries, I read
the
On Saturday, October 1, Travis H. wrote:
Yeah, I neglected stateful matching. I should have said that every
packet that has to run the gauntlet of rules, has to run all of them.
Subsequent reading of the PF FAQ confirms that there's no deep
evaluation-reordering magic going on, that quick
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:32:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
With the risk of making a complete fool of myself..
Is it possible
to get K3B running on OpenBSD 3.7?
I am running KDE as the desktop, I
have tried to install K3B from source without succes. Make fails with
On 10/1/05, Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I helped a friend setup a firewall environment years ago in front of his
web business, first it was on IPF(back when OpenBSD shipped w/IPF), then
PF. Amazingly he's managed to keep his business up, running and growing
through the dot-bomb
Hi Marc and thanks!
After having read through k3b, and having a
partial port, I'm quite
certain the FreeBSD port won't work 100%.
The part that accesses disks directly has got some extensive code that
uses FreeBSD's CAM support. I don't see our emulation layer coping
with
that.
Ok, but other
Dear Amazon member,
Due to concerns we have for the safety and integrity of the Amazon community we
have issued this warning.
Per the User Agreement, Section 9, we may immediately issue a warning,
temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend or terminate your membership and
refuse to
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Mike Hernandez wrote:
SNIP
Great story ;) I'm just wondering what version the firewall is
running, and if it's an old version, have you considered upgrading?
Would there be any benefit to upgrading? (I suppose that last question
is what I'm really wondering about)
Mike
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:05:47 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now my buddy, realizing it was one of his Windows systems, becomes
very contrite and apologizes for interupting me at the office.
I beg to differ, as nice as it is to know the windows box caused the
many states,
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 06:41:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of an alternative to K3B which will burn
DVD's?
dvd+rw-tools doesn't have any gui, but it does burn dvd.
In fact, it's what k3b uses to burn dvd.
It works (more or less) under OpenBSD, I've burnt quite a few
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, ed wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:05:47 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now my buddy, realizing it was one of his Windows systems, becomes
very contrite and apologizes for interupting me at the office.
I beg to differ, as nice as it is to know the
Hello all,
I went and bought a netgear WG311 PCI 54g (Wg311GE) card the other day
to put in my firewall. I intended to use this is as an access point for
a WLAN. This card is listed in the support hardware section on the
openbsd website under i386 but not amd64.
Anyways, I grabbed the
So have him send the message pre-formatted to the list? HTML?
How about just draw the diagram using ports/graphics/dia/* and export to
PNG, post the URL?
~BAS
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 10:01, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:35:16 +0530, Manpreet Singh Nehra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I went and bought a netgear WG311 PCI 54g (Wg311GE) card the other day
to put in my firewall. I intended to use this is as an access point for
a WLAN. This card is listed in the support hardware section on the
openbsd website under i386 but not amd64.
Anyways, I grabbed the
What platform are you on? Are you compiling it from source?
It works just fine in 3.7/i386.
Just:
bash-3.00# cd /usr/ports/net/ntop make install clean
If you insist on source, try looking at /usr/ports/net/ntop/patches/*
Try reading about Ports in the FAQ.
~BAS
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at
--On 02 October 2005 06:07 +1000, Brian McKerr wrote:
Texas Instruments ACX111 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 not
configured
That's not an ath, they've changed the chipset to TI (non-open,
unfortunately). Unfortunately wireless chipsets change often, TI and
Marvell are appearing from
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:22:18 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So have him send the message pre-formatted to the list? HTML?
How about just draw the diagram using ports/graphics/dia/* and export to
PNG, post the URL?
~BAS
No. When a fixed pitch font is used to create the
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 02 October 2005 06:07 +1000, Brian McKerr wrote:
Texas Instruments ACX111 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 not
configured
That's not an ath, they've changed the chipset to TI (non-open,
unfortunately). Unfortunately wireless chipsets change often, TI and
I want to get usb to usb networking up on the Zaurus running OpenBSD (a
snap from about a week ago). I wish to get it to communicate to the
FreeBSD box that is sitting next to it.
When I :reboot: the Zaurus back to Linux, FreeBSD immediately sees a new
cdce0 device, and I could communicate,
I went through the same process. I swapped it for a LinkSys, which had
the revision number on the box (yes, it matters for chipset). It comes
up as supported, but I haven't been able to get it to work yet. I'm not
sure, but I may have a PCI version less than 2.2 and that's listed at a
problem
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:03:48PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
I want to get usb to usb networking up on the Zaurus running OpenBSD (a
snap from about a week ago). I wish to get it to communicate to the
FreeBSD box that is sitting next to it.
When I :reboot: the Zaurus back to Linux,
When I try to boot a Geode GX1 with generic kernel it freeze here:
OpenBSD/i386 PXEBOOT 1.02
booting tftp:/bsd 4807268- (and here it freeze)
I've tried bsd.rd both from the 3.7 and 3.8 dir without any luck, am I
missing any support in kernel?
/bkw
--
##
BKW - Bachman
Hi Marcos,
I never used PPPoE myself, but let me try to help you out...
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:36:24PM -0300, Marcos Vinicius Buzo wrote:
I live in Brazil and my connection is an ADSL link with Telefonica.
Then you probably live somewhere in the state of Sao Paulo :-)
!/sbin/ifconfig
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 07:04:47PM -0300, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
!/sbin/ifconfig \$if inet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
!/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
Why are you doing this? You're setting your gateway to 0.0.0.1.
it is correct for this scenario - pppoe(4) explains why.
jmc
Yes Pedro, I live in the state of Sao Paulo. I used that configuration
because is how the man 4 pppoe is telling i should do, these adresses should
be replaced with the adresses I would receive from my ISP.
A typical */etc/hostname.pppoe0* file looks like this:
pppoedev ne0
Hello,
Is OpenBSD doing anything at the linux conference and expo this week at
the London Olympia?
--
Regards, Ed http://www.openbsdhacker.com
Hello
I want to setup a OBSD box for my email server. It will service
probably about 2 dozen people, but It could conceivably double or more
over the next year or two.
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations for an mta, and for a
webmail program that is easy to use and fully featured
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 07:23:55PM -0300, Marcos Vinicius Buzo wrote:
Yes Pedro, I live in the state of Sao Paulo. I used that configuration
because is how the man 4 pppoe is telling i should do, these adresses should
be replaced with the adresses I would receive from my ISP.
Oh, so never
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 07:04:47PM -0300, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:36:24PM -0300, Marcos Vinicius Buzo wrote:
Does anybody here live in Brazil and use the adsl link from telefonica and
can get it working with OpenBSD/pppoe ?
No. I've a friend who uses PPPoE for
Hi everybody,
I have a laptop at home which is an old dell latitude xpi p133 st. I use
it as a small server, running OpenBSD 3.7. I would like to have my
weather station connected to the laptop, serving the weather via http.
The weather station is a WS3600, racorded to the server via a
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:27:56 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Dweeb, what you recommend is upping the state table so we can
increase the amount of crap that's leaking out from the Windows
system? Brilliant, next time there's a Windows worm polluting the
network I'll just
maildroid www.maildroid.org http://www.maildroid.org
rogern
John 3:16
On 10/1/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I want to setup a OBSD box for my email server. It will service
probably about 2 dozen people, but It could conceivably double or more
over the next year or two.
I was
I am at a loss for a good web interface.
Anyone care to make any recommendations?
I'm a pretty big fan of SquirrelMail. It's a web-based IMAP client,
so you'd need an IMAP server as well (I use Courier). It works just
fine with OpenBSD's chrooted Apache, which is a big plus.
Benny
--
If I had a dollar for every time some mouth breathing twit did
that here well, I could at least buy some very good bottles of wine.
Upgrade the firewall to use the state limits and the overload
table, then filter the overload table and rdr web connections from it
to a web
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, ed wrote:
SNIP
rather than choke the network. Oh and don't resort to name calling, it
makes the rest of the post look childish, even if there is content of
technical merit.
Oh, but see I like name calling against misogynous men, 'cause in your
eyes all women probably appear
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Bob Beck wrote:
If I had a dollar for every time some mouth breathing twit did
that here well, I could at least buy some very good bottles of wine.
Upgrade the firewall to use the state limits and the overload
table, then filter the overload table and rdr web
Hi
During my printer testing the last couple of days I have been running some few
tests.
I have made a test machine (i386) running OpenBSD 3.7 with KDE and all it's
application.
During this test I found that every single program, started from within KDE,
crashes when I use the print option
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:12:33AM +0100, the unit calling itself Stuart
Henderson wrote:
--On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote:
Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is
going to have the security flaw patched?
On Wednesday just gone.
52 matches
Mail list logo
