So far, I have been using pan.
However, it tends to become painfully slow when the groups contain more
than 30.000 messages; exponentially slow.
On the other hand, I don't want to re-ask old questions, and prefer the
archive of gmane.org, which as of now contains almost 100.000 posts.
With
I have tried booting FreeBSD, which should have SMP support per
default, and it also fails to find more than one CPU. And this
particular server is even listed here:
http://www.bnv-bamberg.de/home/ba3294/smp/rbuild/
as successfully booting FreeBSD. Switching the CPUs around hangs the
machine, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:58:19AM +0300, Dmitij Lebed wrote:
May be I wrote in wrong place, excuse me... :)
I've standard openbsd-3.8 on i386 machine.
I've compiled verlihub (dc++ hub - http://verlihub.sourceforge.net/).
In
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Chris wrote:
Stupid mistake...
Never mind... It works.
Can you please elaborate, for the archives...
Thanks !
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:57:40PM +0300, Dmitij Lebed wrote:
you might want to try installing the libtool port/package and using
'make LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool', instead of just 'make'. not
sure if that will fix this, but it might ..
I've started make
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since gdiff isn't needed anymore, do you think mergemaster could be
integrated in the base system one of those days,
I'm considering this.
Are you considering mergeslave as well?
No, if only for the fact that I wasn't aware of its existence until
Hi,
I never did an upgrade process before and always did a full install from
OpenBSD 2.8 to the 3.8.
But I decided to give it a try for fun and learning only. Did 3.6 to
3.7, then to 3.8. The process was great as expected as long as you
follow the great Nick's FAQ.
Thanks Nick for them. I
Christian Weisgerber wrote on Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:46:51PM +:
The questions is, what *do* people use for updating /etc?
Long ago (2.x): diff, mv, and cp.
For a few years: mergemaster.
For 3.6 - 3.7 - 3.8: mergeslave.
I do confirm Han's statement that using mergeslave instead of
Hi,
why do I get this warning in /var/log/daemon:
dhcpd: Multiple interfaces match the same shared network: re0 ral0
even though the dhcpd seems to work (ok, my WLAN over ral0 is unstable,
but I'm not sure if this dhcpd warning is related to that problem):
dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for
On 1/9/06, Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's actually meant by shared network and why is it bad (is it somehow
related to broadcasts?). The ifconfig shows my cards being on 2
different networks:
As mentioned in dhcpd.conf(5), a shared network is a set of (logical)
networks that
I hear you well and clear.
The guy is delusional and has NO basis for his argument.
He is probably just an amateur and has been burnt downloading what he
thought was a Virtual Sex 3D game which turned out to be some infected
trojan/spy ware
Tough.
BT is one of the most revolutionary
Julien,
On 09/01/2006, at 1:10 PM, Julien Bonastre wrote:
The guy is delusional and has NO basis for his argument.
I think your response here (along with the rest) is exaggerated.
Don't worry mate, you've got your head screwed on right. This guy
Graham still goes to work in a horse and
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
IF there is some reason you have to complete an upgrade in one reboot,
or faster than the local boot media process goes, you might want to try
the above referened footnote [1] below. (and if that sentence doesn't
cure you of this delusion that I
Dear fellows,
i am in need to write event driven processing applications. I must
avoid sequential processing. I will be mixing RPC queries and dns
ones.
I saw, at the first sigh, writing non batch program is very hard to
accomplish. So i wonder how openbsd manages when there are n process,
for
Nick Holland wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
IF there is some reason you have to complete an upgrade in one reboot,
or faster than the local boot media process goes, you might want to try
the above referened footnote [1] below. (and if that sentence doesn't
cure you of this
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
No, if only for the fact that I wasn't aware of its existence until
you mentioned it just now.
The questions is, what *do* people use for updating /etc?
I've been using mergemaster for several years now, it's an essential
tool for me. But then again, I'm perfectly
On 1/8/06, Jonathan Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would really appreciate having mergemaster in the base system.
Or at least a mention of it in the upgrade FAQ [
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade38.html ]. Even just something like
Some people find the sysutils/mergemaster port useful for
17 matches
Mail list logo
