On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:16 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
Try
to name at least one incentive for Alberta to fund a project where the
financial benefits will largely be reaped outside of Alberta.
For a lot of people, OpenBSD has put Alberta on the map...
Cheers
Steffen.
I just did a fresh install of 3.9-current. And part of the dmesg is coming
across oddly. I am not sure what else to say about it. It's the iic0 and
iic1.
Check it out:
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #670: Sat Apr 1 23:34:55 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
On 4/3/06, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a fresh install of 3.9-current. And part of the dmesg is coming
across oddly. I am not sure what else to say about it. It's the iic0 and
iic1.
It's just the new sensors framework telling you that it has
encountered an unsupported sensor
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:11:22AM +0530, Niklaus wrote:
On 4/2/06, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/06, Niklaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what problem are you really trying to solve?
really, what problem are you trying to solve? the fact that you have
untrusted users?
iic0 at nviic0
sch5017 at iic0 addr 0x2e not configured
iic0: addr 0x2e 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 09=00
0a=00 0b=00 0c=00 0d=00 0e=00 0f=00 10=00 11=00 12=00 13=00 14=00 15=00 16=00
17=00 18=00 19=00 1a=00 1b=00 1c=00 1d=00 1e=00 1f=ec 20=65 21=7a 22=c2 23=c4
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing to do, since the Apache
version currently bundled with it seems to have problems.
I just lost my entire development box to a hack this week, right through
smoothwall's DMZ.
David B. wrote:
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing to do, since the Apache
version currently bundled with it seems to have problems.
You should check the archive if you don't want to be flame.
The license
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Source code published under version 2 of the Apache license cannot be
included into OpenBSD.
On 4/3/06, David B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, David B. wrote:
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing to do, since the Apache
version currently bundled with it seems to have problems.
I just lost my entire development box to a hack this
On 2006/04/03 02:40, David B. wrote:
I even had all packets dropped that came from asia, south america and africa.
What's the point in this? If you want to drop packets from places where
there might be attackers, you certainly need to include N.America and
Europe on your list.
I don't mind
The point being, if you sell security as your market niche, you might want
to make sure that, at least, Apache be up to date, and not a version from
5
years ago where who knows how many hacks there are out there for it.
If I remember correctly it is a modified version of apache 1.3. It is
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:40:50AM -0600, David B. wrote:
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing to do, since the Apache
version currently bundled with it seems to have problems.
I just lost my entire
David B. wrote:
hi, I see 3.9 is getting ready to be released. Do you plan on bundling
Apache2 with it? it would seem a logical thing to do, since the Apache
version currently bundled with it seems to have problems.
I just lost my entire development box to a hack this week, right through
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:40:50AM -0600, David B. wrote:
I just lost my entire development box to a hack this week, right through
smoothwall's DMZ. I had apache up, postgresql installed with the mod_php as
the middleware. All settings were default and the only port I had open was
80
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:30:04 +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn, now you've got me curious...
All joking aside, if someone wanted to check out humppa for the first
time, would this be a good album to buy?
They have some songs available for download on their
This is my /etc/X11/xorg.conf file.
Section ServerLayout
Identifier X.org Configured
Screen 0 Screen0 0 0
InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer
InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard
EndSection
Section Files
RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Francisco Valladolid
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Nick Holland
Cc: misc
Subject: Re: Problems with X in OpenBSD (3.9) -current with LCD
WideScreen Monitor
This is my /etc/X11/xorg.conf
I have installed OpenBSD 3.8 in a laptop with a winmodem so I can't
connect to the internet with it but recently by chance I realised that
OpenBSD3.8 recognised the bluetooth adapter I had plugged in on the USB, a
Belkin v1.2 10m range, during boot up time it highlited it and
acknowledged
Hi!
I'd like to buy the Wireframe Puffy.
Has anyone order t-short from Ukraine?
How many extra money does it take to deliver it to Ukraine?
--
Alexey V. Vatchenko
http://psytech.h10.ru
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 162799204
Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to buy the Wireframe Puffy.
Has anyone order t-short from Ukraine?
How many extra money does it take to deliver it to Ukraine?
I don't know about the Ukraine, but I ordered a couple of t-shirts, 31
days ago and there's still no sign of the goods. VERY
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Craig wrote:
Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to buy the Wireframe Puffy.
Has anyone order t-short from Ukraine?
How many extra money does it take to deliver it to Ukraine?
I don't know about the Ukraine, but I ordered a couple of t-shirts, 31
days ago
On 4/3/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:11:22AM +0530, Niklaus wrote:
On 4/2/06, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/06, Niklaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what problem are you really trying to solve?
really, what problem are you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed OpenBSD 3.8 in a laptop with a winmodem so I can't
connect to the internet with it but recently by chance I realised that
OpenBSD3.8 recognised the bluetooth adapter I had plugged in on the USB,
a Belkin v1.2 10m range, during boot up time it highlited
On 4/3/06, Gordon Grieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 02:40:50AM -0600, David B. wrote:
I just lost my entire development box to a hack this week, right through
smoothwall's DMZ. I had apache up, postgresql installed with the mod_php
as
the middleware. All settings
I'd like to know if it's possible to mount a Windows share that is
located on a Windows 2003 server machine which also has my OpenBSD
3.8. My machine does not belong to the Windows machine's domain. I've
tried the same system to mount with GNU/Linux but I hadn't any
success. I've already search
2006/4/3, Samurai Chef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on Sunday 02 April 2006 07:58 pm, Deanna Phillips wrote:
And yeah, Linux users are generally stupid.
Can help but chime in on the stupid issue...
I run Windows, MPE i/X, HP-UX, OpenBSD, Linux, Oracle, and Cisco
routers, and yes, sometimes, I'm
On 4/3/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know if it's possible to mount a Windows share that is
located on a Windows 2003 server machine which also has my OpenBSD
3.8. My machine does not belong to the Windows machine's domain. I've
tried the same system to mount with
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:03:02PM +0100, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 4/3/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know if it's possible to mount a Windows share that is
located on a Windows 2003 server machine which also has my OpenBSD
3.8. My machine does not belong to the
Are any SAS controllers (LSI, or otherwise) supported? The HP DL380
G5's are supposed to start shipping with the P600 controller - looking
at the ciss(4) driver, I _think_ it works, but I'm not sure I'm
reading correctly ;)
--Bill
Hi,
This one kinda supprised me. When I was looking around by new 3.8
install I noticed that in /etc/skel/.profile that PATH contains a . in
it, which I found supprising as I've always assumed that this was not a
sensible thing to do. I've taken it out as I'm not too happy when
having the
I personally tested a DL360 G4 with SAS/P600 and it worked like a
charm (after a small patch I've sent; this is in 3.9-STABLE).
Actually, ciss(4) doesn't really care if the controller is SAS or not.
It just works, unlike LSI mpt(4). There is some hacking going on to
add SAS support for it. If all
I'm playing a bit with bgpd while trying to get the kids to sleep, 50% to
go.
With Hennings next-hop self patch I made a minimal config and slapped
together
a network with a handful of routers with a config like below:
AS 65000
network 172.16.0.1/32
network connected
network static
group ibgp {
That is not a . in the sense of the current directory. .profile is a hidden
directory and the . prefix denotes this...
Josh
- Original Message -
From: Jon Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:10 PM
Subject: why is there . [dot] in default PATH?
Jon Kent wrote:
This one kinda supprised me. When I was looking around by new
3.8 install I noticed that in /etc/skel/.profile that PATH
contains a . in it, which I found supprising as I've always
assumed that this was not a sensible thing to do. I've taken it
out as I'm not too happy when
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
...[ . in the path ...]
As long as it is at the end of your PATH it's not that bad.
I disagree. Because that makes exploiting typos possible.
(cat - cta *oops*, for example)
Kind regards,
Hannah.
On 4/3/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/3/06, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
sizeof(char) = 1 by definition.
Isn't using sizeof(char) clearer though? It doesn't change the binary
anyway so what does it matter how it's written?
-Nick
On 4/3/06, Josh Caster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is not a . in the sense of the current directory. .profile is a hidden
directory and the . prefix denotes this...
What did you smoke?
.profile is not a directory and that line DOES add . to your PATH.
And I always learned that was a unsafe
On 4/3/06, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Kent wrote:
This one kinda supprised me. When I was looking around by new
3.8 install I noticed that in /etc/skel/.profile that PATH
contains a . in it, which I found supprising as I've always
assumed that this was not a sensible thing
On 4/3/06, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Kent wrote:
This one kinda supprised me. When I was looking around by new
3.8 install I noticed that in /etc/skel/.profile that PATH
contains a . in it, which I found supprising as I've always
assumed that this was not a sensible thing
Does any body know how to recompile the OpenBSD included
sendmail source (-current) to use Berkeley DB4 from ports?
I've been trying to recompile sendmail from source (-current) with
Berkeley DB4 support enabled... and I can't seem to figure it out.
Using the standard sendmail distribution I
Actually I did mention to you in my email that I am using the F.14 BIOS
update, but you are correct I did not provide the URL to where I downloaded
it from, so here it is:
http://h18007.www1.hp.com/support/files/hpcpqnk/us/download/22830.html
Thanks to Jeff's info on the serial setup, here is
Summer is coming and for student like me, it mean nothing to do for a
while. I usely play around with embedded system but I'd like to put
my hand on a PCIe FPGA dev board for the summer.
Since I never made use of crypto card(but I know OpenSSH candirectly
make use of them) I wonder if it worth
Basicaly, is the PCI bus a bottle neck for crypto card or is it the
chip on the card?
No.
The scatter gather interface is the bottleneck. This is normally
setup a bit like an ethernet or scsi chipset's outstanding operations
list, but you need to be able to cut virtual address ranges into
Basicaly, is the PCI bus a bottle neck for crypto card or is it the
chip on the card?
No.
The scatter gather interface is the bottleneck. This is normally
setup a bit like an ethernet or scsi chipset's outstanding operations
list, but you need to be able to cut virtual address ranges
Hi All,
I've setup a Cisco replacement using OpenBSD and OpenBGPd and man, this
thing FLIES :) I paid almost $3k AUD recently for another 64MB of RAM for
our Cisco 2610 and it was still struggling under the load of 6 - 8mb/sec!
The new OpenBSD box is running at less that 2% CPU pushing 20mb/sec -
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:59:29AM -0500, Pierre Groulx wrote:
I think that we're all waiting for the first report of a 3200 working
properly. I know that I am...
Pierre
so here it goes... looks (un)surprisingly similar to the C3100 dmesg. :)
3.8 would work, but to use the graphical
Karl Kopp wrote:
One thing I need to do urgently tho is move my /var mount - I'm not 100% how
to do this on a running box with the least amount of down time. Any hints /
advice would be greatly appreciated!
Check towards the end of the
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#NewDisk (14.3)
Hi,
I understand the whole issue with snapshots being held up for the
release cycle. I have followed the mail list and archives, and still
have not figured out the answer...
If I want to install OpenBSD 3.9-stable (or the release ..), what is the
easiest way to do that?
There is no 3.9
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 11:55, Steve Williams wrote:
If I want to install OpenBSD 3.9-stable (or the release ..), what is the
easiest way to do that?
Wait for it to be released.
---
Lars Hansson
Unless you pre-ordered a CD, the release goes up on ftp sites on
or right before the release date, hence release date is used.
The fact that -current is up on ftp has nothing to do with the
release being available.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Steve Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag, april 4, 2006 05:55 AM
Aan: misc@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: OpenBSD 3.9-stable (not current) install?
...
If I want to install OpenBSD 3.9-stable (or the release ..), what is the
easiest way to do
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 07:56:26 -0700
J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 16:07:43 +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ music |Aqua Barbie Girl ]
April Fools is one thing but someone around here has a really twisted
sense of humor.
52 matches
Mail list logo
