On 4/7/07, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running OpenBSD -current from the snapshot dated 04-06. Everytime I bring
my thinkpad x40 out of sleep I get iwi0: fatal firmware error. I'm running
the generic kernel and have a intel 2200bg card.
Yep..the card sucks. I have the same
visualizar cartco
http://uolca rtoes123m.vila.bol.com.br/cartao_uol.html
Hi list!
Simple(?) question:
How do I enable tcp fast retransmissions?
I've got a wireless network with a lot of interference
which results in about 30% packet loss. Fast retransmission
should help here, right?
However:
* Counter for fast retrans in 'netstat -s' is always zero.
* Nothing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have had this machine, with bioctl and dmesg posted below, lockup on me
both this saturday and last weekend as well. its console is com0 by
default and there is no serial console output (e.g. ddb). when viewing it
over KVM (/dev/ttyC0) the cursor keeps blinking but it
Hi all,
I was just trying to setup an ntpd server for my home network so it could sync
with each other. So here's what I have in my /etc/ntpd.conf:
# $OpenBSD: ntpd.conf,v 1.7 2004/07/20 17:38:35 henning Exp $
# sample ntpd configuration file, see ntpd.conf(5)
# Addresses to listen on (ntpd
It will take some time before ntpd begins with syncing. Don't ask me
why, but it took a day for me before my ntpd was beginning with
syncing.
On 4/8/07, Reza Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was just trying to setup an ntpd server for my home network so it could sync
with each
On 4/8/07, Reza Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Even though it seems to be working, I still can't get the date to sync from
clients.
You're running ntpd or ntpdate on the clients with 192.168.1.1 as their server?
When I try to telnet to 192.168.1.1 on port 123, it says Connection
Hi All,
I have more than one interface I need to monitor with snort. I've read
http://www.snort.org/docs/faq/1Q05/node35.html, To do that, I've created
bridge0 and added both interfaces. Since I need to assign IP addresses
to each interface, I could not just up the interfaces and add them to
the
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Mispunt wrote:
It will take some time before ntpd begins with syncing. Don't ask me
why, but it took a day for me before my ntpd was beginning with
syncing.
I think this is different, because it's reporting Connection Refused
rather than allowing
cpu0: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2
cache) 1.60 GHz
That's interesting. How long have you been running OBSD 4.0 on that
machine? I have the mobile version of this cpu, and my laptop started
locking up erratically (also w/o ddb) shortly after upgrading from
His problem was not about ntpd not syncing. At any rate, Reza, do you have
any firewalls that could be blocking the port? If you switch listen on
192.168.1.1 to listen on * does that change your situation?
On 4/8/07, Mispunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will take some time before ntpd begins
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 09:14:04PM +0700, Reza Muhammad wrote:
Hi all,
I was just trying to setup an ntpd server for my home network so it
could sync with each other. So here's what I have in my
/etc/ntpd.conf:
# $OpenBSD: ntpd.conf,v 1.7 2004/07/20 17:38:35 henning Exp $
# sample ntpd
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:49:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have had this machine, with bioctl and dmesg posted below, lockup on me
both this saturday and last weekend as well. its console is com0 by
default and there is no serial console output (e.g. ddb). when viewing it
over KVM
hello,
does anyone know if it is possible to get the cvsup sources via cvsup, if so,
which server?
thanks a lot!
didier
Stephen Takacs wrote:
cpu0: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2
cache) 1.60 GHz
That's interesting. How long have you been running OBSD 4.0 on that
machine? I have the mobile version of this cpu, and my laptop started
locking up erratically (also w/o ddb)
I may have been mistaken. I just pulled this information from this document
which Gregory Lebovitz from Netscreen co-authored back in 2003. On page 46
he talks about using GRE to create a virtual routing interfaces AKA tunnel
interface. I have configure route-based VPNs between a Netscreen and
This link would probably help ;)
http://www.isi.edu/div7/presentation_files/dynamic_routing.pdf
On 4/8/07, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may have been mistaken. I just pulled this information from this
document which Gregory Lebovitz from Netscreen co-authored back in 2003. On
page
FranC'ois Rousseau wrote:
But how I'm suppose to annonce the route for the right carp interface?
Right now my servers can always reach the router because of the CARP
interface but the router can't always reach the servers...
If I unplug the cable of my CARP interface (bge2 for example),
Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone know if it is possible to get the cvsup sources via cvsup,
if so, which server?
Yes, it is. Any server offering OpenBSD via CVSup should include
xenocara. If a particular server doesn't, poke the admin. They
probably forgot to add the
Chris Jones writes:
I may have been mistaken. I just pulled this information from this document
which Gregory Lebovitz from Netscreen co-authored back in 2003.
No FortiGate model supported GRE in 2003, it wasn't added until 2006.
On page 46 he talks about using GRE to create a virtual
On 2007/04/08 14:43, Stephen J. Bevan wrote:
On page 46 he talks about using GRE to create a virtual routing
interfaces AKA tunnel interface. I have configure route-based VPNs
between a Netscreen and FortiGate which interop just fine, which
leads me to believe that they are using the
Stuart Henderson writes:
interesting; if my understanding of this and the RFC that the referenced
'touch' draft was published as (rfc3884), at one end you can configure one
side in *transport* mode carrying ipip encapsulated packets - gif(4) with
net.inet.ipip.allow=1, afaict - and the
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:11:37PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
What you are describing is almost certainly the i386-on-amd64 problem.
Solution is to do one of the following (in my order of preference, your
criteria may be different than mine, of course!) :
* run OpenBSD/amd64 (where this
Stephen Takacs wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:11:37PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
What you are describing is almost certainly the i386-on-amd64 problem.
Solution is to do one of the following (in my order of preference, your
criteria may be different than mine, of course!) :
* run
A quick google hasn't been very helpful ... are there any guides to tuning
OpenBSD kernel in 4.x for optimum performance on routers?
We're starting to see some bizarre behaviour and memory issues on some of
our busier border routers
Things such as
(note the minus 59% usage)
[EMAIL
Nick Holland wrote:
In that case, could you provide a full dmesg on the thing? This sounds
interesting, I'd really love to know what -current does on it, though
I guess we can wait a few weeks for 4.1-release. :)
(not like I'm the guy who has the knowledge to troubleshoot what's going
on
26 matches
Mail list logo
