I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board.
Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624.
Here is dmesg line:
DS1621:
iic1: addr 0x48 22=0a 40=0a 41=0f 42=0a 43=0a 44=0a 45=0a 46=0a 47=0a
48=0c 49=10 4a=c4 4b=01 4c=0e 4d=00 4e=d6 4f=00 51=0f a1=0f a2=0a a8=0c
On 2007/06/30 10:46, Leon KomloE!i wrote:
I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board.
Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624.
There's _some_ success since the devices are seen...
Here is dmesg line:
DS1624
iic1: addr 0x48 a2=da a3=eb a4=30 a5=6e
I have a server that runs OpenBSD 4.1, and a laptop running Windows. I want
to use Thunderbird on the laptop to send mail via the server. The laptop
connects from many different networks.
I would like to use port 587, since some isps blocks port 25.
I want to use my username/password to
On 2007/06/30 12:46, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
Googling gives a lot of references to SASL. Do I really have to go
down that road to do something as simple as this?
for smtp auth, yes. but for a simple use like this, why not just
ssh-tunnel instead?
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Leon Komlo?i wrote:
I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board.
Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624.
Here is dmesg line:
DS1621:
iic1: addr 0x48 22=0a 40=0a 41=0f 42=0a 43=0a 44=0a 45=0a 46=0a 47=0a
Hello list,
I've been bitten by a race condition in spamd. I've got a low-prio MX
configured as an MX trap with spamd -M:
bzero.se. 900 IN MX 10 mx.bzero.se.
bzero.se. 900 IN MX 99 mxtrap.bzero.se.
In the log below, a re-attempt at
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
http://www.emin3m09.uv.ro/postcard.gif.exe
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and
In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username
webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so
httpd can access/write to their dir as well.
Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas?
You don't want the www user being able to write to your web space.
Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007/06/30 12:46, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
Googling gives a lot of references to SASL. Do I really have to go
down that road to do something as simple as this?
for smtp auth, yes.
OK.
but for a simple use like this, why not just
ssh-tunnel
On 6/29/07, Austin Hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to set up a fairly heavy duty web server I encountered boot
problems with this fairly new machine using the release CD ROM. Using the
-c command at the boot prompt I already see error messages, before it
gives me the UKC ...
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.'
You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README:
Relaying
SMTP STARTTLS can allow relaying for remote SMTP clients which have
successfully authenticated
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.'
You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README:
Relaying
SMTP STARTTLS can allow relaying for remote SMTP clients which
Brian Candler schreef:
In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username
webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so
httpd can access/write to their dir as well.
Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas?
You don't want the www user being able
Hello!
When I exit from the X, I got following warning message:
I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found
I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BUSID PCI:02:0 in Section Device
of xorg.conf,
but it can't start the X, what is the problem and how to fix it? thanks!
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.'
You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README:
Then I would need client certificates, wouldn't I?
Yes. As you have a cert
Hello!
When I exit from the X, I got following warning message:
I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found
I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BusID PCI:0:2:1 in Section Device
of xorg.conf, but it can't start the X, what is the problem and how to
fix it? thanks!
Hi
Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Password:secret_in_echo
output of pfctl /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$
I don't see anything about this in the manpage so I think this
On Saturday 30 June 2007 19:31, Tom Van Looy wrote:
Hi
Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Password:secret_in_echo
output of pfctl /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$
I
Tom Van Looy wrote:
Hi
Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Password:secret_in_echo
output of pfctl /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
$
I don't see anything about this in the manpage
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.'
You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README:
Then I would need client
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
I have a self-signed server cert that I created using commands that
I barely understand. I have no idea where to start.
By reading the fine instructions :-)
man starttls
sendmail operations guide: doc/op/op.*
I guess I need a CA key, and CA cert.
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
I have a self-signed server cert that I created using commands that
I barely understand. I have no idea where to start.
By reading the fine instructions :-)
man starttls
I have read that, done that. Nothing
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:51:22PM +0200, Matt wrote:
You don't want user 1's web applications to be able to access data in user
2's web application storage space.
I will only be using mod_php. In the past, without the user shell
accounts, this has worked rather well for me in combination
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
man starttls
I have read that, done that. Nothing about client certs there.
sendmail doesn't care as long as it is a cert.
Anyway, you are the maintainer of the free version of sendmail?
Yes.
Would you consider putting in LOGIN/PLAIN
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping
it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i
installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through
the following stable
If someone sends a good patch: yes (see the website for the
correct address where to sent patches). Note that this isn't
as simple as it might seem: the problem is where you store
the passwords for PLAIN. You certainly don't want to reuse
the existing system passwords.
Put the authentication
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
man starttls
I have read that, done that. Nothing about client certs there.
sendmail doesn't care as long as it is a cert.
Surely it has to be signed with some key trusted by the particular
sendmail
Aaron wrote:
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping
it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i
installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through
the
Well, that is exactly what I want to do. I use the system passwords
for imap anyway, so why not? Of course, the channel must be protected
by SSL/TLS when you do that.
Because there are a large number of IMAP clients that are not aware of
LOGINDISABLED, and which will blindly attempt LOGIN or
On 6/30/07, Alex Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
When I exit from the X, I got following warning message:
I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found
This is just a warning. You can ignore it.
I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BusID PCI:0:2:1 in Section
James Hartley wrote:
On 6/30/07, *Aaron* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the
misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
The following link from the FAQ
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
The following link from the FAQ describes what the roles of each file set.
Perhaps this will provide
Firas Kraiem wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for
keeping it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for
me. When i installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41.
I
On Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 15:13:31 -0500, Aaron wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
Yes, that's the way make build works. It compiles and installs
everything in the source
Maurice Janssen writes:
Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of
following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no
use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as
possible.
I'm sure it's possible to modify the tree in
Marco S Hyman wrote:
Maurice Janssen writes:
Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of
following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no
use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as
possible.
I'm sure it's possible to
Is the Intel 975X Express Chipset supported by OpenBSD 4.1 ?
Thank you,
Juan
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another
question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am
making an assumption here that people would want to update code when
needed, and be supported, why even give the
The 965 works fine for me. I use the pci-e slot with an 8x raid controller
instead of a 16x video card. The CPU is the cheapest 512k cache celeron D that
I could find, they are really fast and around $40-$50.
Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Intel 975X Express Chipset supported by
David Higgs wrote:
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another
question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am
making an assumption here that people would want to update code when
needed, and be
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:23 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I have been throwing around a phrase for a few weeks. Perhaps it
should
be popularized.
OpenBSD is free as in air.
Unfortunately, Richard Stallman beat you to this one by about 24 years.
He never popularized it, but this was one of
I've found that most clients don't need or expect to login to a web server.
The handful of people that do can be given their own dedicated server to use
or something like that. For the rest, just give each domain name/user
their own httpd instance running with its own config, its own unix user,
From: Fredrik Staxeng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a server that runs OpenBSD 4.1, and a laptop running
Windows. I want
to use Thunderbird on the laptop to send mail via the server. The
laptop
connects from many different networks.
I would like to use port 587, since some isps blocks port 25.
I want
43 matches
Mail list logo
