> In an effort to port a Performance Enhancing Proxy (PEP, see scps.org)
> to OpenBSD, I am looking at ways to simulate radio channels at IP
> level with loss rate, delay and jitter.
Not sure whether it fits your purpose, but honeyd can _simulate_ that.
http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/honeyd/
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
//art
This is due to changes in the config files, but your config doesn't know
the syntax. Recompile usr.sbin/config and install it before running
config.
-moj
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
> times thi
"Alexey Suslikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johan Mson Lindman wrote:
>
> > > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/cpumemory.pdf
> > >
> > > - Alexey.
> >
> >
> > Is this paper from the same Drepper as is posting in the URL below?
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-08/msg00053.html
You noticed Theos' work on libkern?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=119601531025980&w=2
You need to rebuild /usr/sbin/config, but perhaps wait until
it's official
-Mark
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my src tree (current sources)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
> times this afternoon but I'm not able to build the kernel anymore, is anyone
> else experiencing this issue?
> I'm able to reproduce this on ano
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
>I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
>times this afternoon but I'm not able to build the kernel anymore, is anyone
>else experiencing this issue?
If you want to recompile current from source
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
> times this afternoon but I'm not able to build the kernel anymore, is anyone
> else experiencing this issue?
> I'm able to reproduce this on ano
frantisek holop a icrit :
> hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen said that
>
>> David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
>>> Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
>>>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
in the browsers I have within easy reach here (Konqueror
Hello,
I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
times this afternoon but I'm not able to build the kernel anymore, is anyone
else experiencing this issue?
I'm able to reproduce this on another PC where I updated the source too.
cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf &&
hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen said that
> David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
> >
> > Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
> > helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
>
> in the br
hi!
i have some problems with getting ACPI going on the notebook.
(the same problems seems to appear for compaq 6910p [much
newer notebook] but this may be just because i need to run
amd64 port on it). i also want to point that some versions of
current were hanging up instead of instant reboot.
s
David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
>
> Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
> helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
in the browsers I have within easy reach here (Konqueror, Firefox and
that Microsoft thing) the text on
--- Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Miscaro wrote:
> > --- Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> The standard way to handle upgrades is to update the src
> >> on the master only, to build new release sets on the master,
> >> and to use the official upgrade process to i
With all due respect to all contributors on the internet.
It seems lot of BSD/unix notes and other documentation is scattered all over
the internet in hapzard way. which newcomers find thru google(1) and then try
to use it. Most of the time "date and version etc." is not mentioned in the
docume
On Nov 26, 2007 1:15 PM, David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >> On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> >>>
> >>> Observe the ALT text
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Vasek wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.xkcd.com/349/
Observe the ALT text on the comic.
Haven't seen a PR on that one...
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:13:41PM -0300, Limaunion wrote:
> Hi misc! I upgraded my old i486 box to a _new_ pentium 166, but after
> less than 24 hours running it I got a kernel crash. I'm sending dmesg
> plus some screenshots from ps + trace + show registers.
this looks like a signal jump to a tr
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.xkcd.com/349/
Observe the ALT text on the comic.
Haven't seen a PR on that one...
What do they mean by this?
Its a j
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:55:16PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> > >
> > > Observe the ALT text on the comic.
> > >
> > > Haven't seen a PR on tha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> >
> > Observe the ALT text on the comic.
> >
> > Haven't seen a PR on that one...
> >
> >
>
> What do they mean by this?
>
Its a joke, I think e
The wxwidgets version in packages for 4.2 is fairly old - wxwidgets
2.6.3 and it was apparently built using lots of the assorted string
functions that the OpenBSD gcc pisses and moans about. If I link most
anything to wxwidets get a raft of warnings - making it hard to see if
there are any ne
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/349/
>
> Observe the ALT text on the comic.
>
> Haven't seen a PR on that one...
>
>
What do they mean by this?
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemout
Johan Mson Lindman wrote:
> > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/cpumemory.pdf
> >
> > - Alexey.
>
>
> Is this paper from the same Drepper as is posting in the URL below?
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-08/msg00053.html
Yes. But it's up to you - to leave yourself in 2000.
- Alexey.
What might be required to be able to use a labjack in OpenBSD? The U3
device is recognized as USB generic device
ugen0 at uhub1
port 1 "LabJack LabJack U3" rev 1.10/0.00 addr 2
Would it be sufficient to port the available linux library
(http://www.labjack.com/labjack_u3_downloads.php) to speak
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
