Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
75% idle if nothing else is happening on the machine.
I know about 'nice', but it
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
75% idle if
Hi all,
I want use Zend optimizer with apache and php5.
I downloaded ZendOptimizer-3.3.0a-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz from Zend
website (latest version is only for 3.4) and unpacked archive and copied PHP
module from /data/5_2_x_comp/ZendOptimizer.so to /var/www/lib/ZendOptimizer.so
I put lines
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# Secure Distribution.
The most secure operation system gets distributed on FTP servers
as unsigned binaries.
You should create your own binaries if you want secure binaries.
He's also conveniently forgetting about the MD5 sums, conveniently
provided in a
Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
same vulnerable channel, helps to make sure, that they are not backdoored ;]
you don't have to wait that long. fetch
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:11:13PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# Secure Distribution.
The most secure operation system gets distributed on FTP servers
as unsigned binaries.
You should create your own binaries if you want secure binaries.
He's also
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
qt4 port to use a
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
same vulnerable channel, helps to make sure,
Nikns Siankin P=P0P?P8QP0:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we will meet in Riga, I will like to hear from you explanation,
how does putting md5 checksum file *along* with installables on the
same
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process
Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hahaha. yeah. different vulnerable mirror, while I'm MITM'ing your ISP.
see ya
the other option of course is to just buy the CDs.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
Hello,
I'm running current (a few days old).
I would like to log some traffic to the pflog1 interface. Everything works
fine except a problem with pflogd and the -p switch.
I use the following as default:
1) pflogd -s 116 -i pflog0 -f /var/log/pflog
The process is:
$ cat /var/run/pflogd.pid
Merhaba,
Sizi XING C'evreme davet etmek isterim!
Kararlar sC6zkonusu olduD unda iliE kiler gittikC'e daha C'ok C6nem kazanD1yor.
XING Czerinden iliE kileri gCncel tutmak, geliE tirmek ve onlardan
yararlanmak C'ok kolay. D0liE kilerim arasD1nda sizi de gC6rebilirsem memnun
olurum.
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
Hi,
when starting X (and thereby cwm due to my .xinitrc), I get the
following error:
cwm: root window unavailable - perhaps another wm is running?
It happens right after boot up, where I'm sure no other wm is running.
My
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Oh, no wait. you want *other* people todo the work for you,
its not enough that you got what they gave already you want
more, you ungrateful whining dick.
--
Wer nicht liebt Wein, Weib und Gesang / Der bleibt ein Narr sein Lebelang.
On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas
Hi Folks,
I would like to know what web traffic analyzer should I use on my
network. I mean, what do you recommend.
Thanks in advance.
--
Joao Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver
On Jan 14 14:55:32, Martin Toft wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
when starting X (and thereby cwm due to my .xinitrc), I get the
following error:
cwm: root window unavailable - perhaps another wm is running?
cwm echoes the error message above and
2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: For example, I would
want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
available CPU, leaving the CPU 75% idle if nothing else is happening
on the machine.
This not possible in OpenBSD (and
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:10:01PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
If users don't normally install microcode in the CPU, then ethically
it may as well be a circuit. It is not built as a circuit, but that's
a different question.
That may as well be an ethically confusing sentence.
If users
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:20:46AM +, Wim Lewis wrote:
How much should I expect Bluetooth to be working on OBSD 4.2? I can get some
things to work, but I can't successfully open an RFCOMM connecton.
The ubt(4) driver was fixed in -current, -r1.10 of sys/dev/usb/ubt.c.
Uwe
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:10:12PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
| 2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: For example, I would
| want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
| available CPU, leaving the CPU 75% idle if
On Mon 2008.01.14 at 14:17 +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
How can I make this to work:
pflogd -s 116 -i pflog1 -f /var/log/pflog1 -p /var/log/pflogd1.pid
you want:
pflogd -s 116 -i pflog1 -f /var/log/pflog1 -p pflogd1
which will write /var/run/pflogd1.pid .
On Jan 14, 2008 9:27 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not quite the same because a process, even running at niceness
level 20, will grab as much CPU as it can (unless it has to wait for
data).
What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: For example, I would
want the build
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:10:12 +0100
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/14, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What I mean is what I wrote in my first email: For example, I would
want the build of the qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the
available CPU, leaving the CPU 75%
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:34:13PM +, Andreas Kahari wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
Until that, i can stick my diffs in your ass.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:54:33PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jan 14 14:55:32, Martin Toft wrote:
cwm echoes the error message above and terminates if xbindkeys is
running. My solution at the moment is to not use xbindkeys...
This is strange. I am running xbindkeys and it never bothered
Evgeniy Sudyr schreef:
Hi all,
I want use Zend optimizer with apache and php5.
I downloaded ZendOptimizer-3.3.0a-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz from Zend
website (latest version is only for 3.4) and unpacked archive and copied PHP
module from /data/5_2_x_comp/ZendOptimizer.so to
Hello Evgeniy,
You can try this how-to, this might work for you:
Solution for ZendOptimizer to work under OpenBSD 4.1/i386
1. Download the file for OpenBSD 3.x as distributed by Zend
currently ZendOptimizer-3.2.8-openbsd3.4-i386.tar.gz
2. Untar (tar -xzf ZendOpt*), and fetch the files
-
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:35:25PM +0100, Martin Toft wrote:
After a bit of poking around, I've discovered that the error only occurs
if I define one or more short cuts using xbindkeys that use the same
keys as the short cuts in cwm do. I guess this behaviour should be
expected, even though I
Just checking if anyone has made any progress thus far getting dual
screens to function ?
On 05/11/2007, Paulo Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
Just wondering about any success stories getting dual-screen/xinerama
running under OpenBSD 4.2-release with nVidia cards (G73) under X.
Hello everyone,
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this past
Thursday, it was working great. I may be mistaken, but I don't think I've
ever seen entries like the following before (email
Hello everyone,
My apologies if you get this twice-- it just occurred to me that I sent
my original message out using the wrong email address.
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this
Hello Marcos,
Monday, January 14, 2008, 7:18:27 PM, you wrote:
Hello Evgeniy,
You can try this how-to, this might work for you:
Solution for ZendOptimizer to work under OpenBSD 4.1/i386
1. Download the file for OpenBSD 3.x as distributed by Zend
currently
I really tried resisting replying to this but this is simply too much.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:27:24AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
And who controls GPL? What will you do when all GPL software and
subsequent
developments are kept on servers out of reach of users (BSD
On 1/14/08, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, I don't have a good reason for wanting to do this. It just
seemed like something someone might want to do. But let me dream up
three examples: Sometimes firefox (or whatever program) goes a bit
haywire and brings the machine to a
Hi,
Has anyone been able to get X (xenocara?) working properly with an nvidia
8800GT (not GTS or GTX).
It worked right out of the box with my 8600GTS but so far, not the 8800GT.
Would it help if I include any logs or anything specific or any
recommendations as to what I can try to get full
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Daniel Barowy wrote:
I would greatly appreciate it someone would help me diagnose this spamd
problem. We've been running spamd since last October, and until this past
Thursday, it was working great. I may be mistaken, but I don't think I've
ever seen entries like the
Nikns Siankin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
Until that, i
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:30:11 Nikns Siankin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lots of whining.
Where are your diffs to fix these issues ?
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that
On 1/14/08 7:58 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 06:27:24AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
What will be in GPLv4?
GPLv4 will be basically the same as all previous versions: it will
grant the four freedoms to everyone, and protect them for everyone, as
best as we can
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:39:15PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
you are correct that some of the issues you brought up are actual
shortcomings in openbsd. however, **bitching** that these are problems that
need to be fixed is about as rude as you can get. a number of the issues
you
Maybe it would be feasible to run your ideal user space in a virtual
environment (i.e. qemu), where the guest user space thinks it can use
the CPU for itself when in fact it's just 50-75% of the actual
machine.
On Jan 14, 2008 10:27 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008,
On 1/14/08, Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, before you ask for diffs,
I have to hear from devs, that these ARE
considered to be issues that MUST be fixed.
they are not issues that must be fixed.
On Jan 14, 2008 10:09 PM, Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:39:15PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
you are correct that some of the issues you brought up are actual
shortcomings in openbsd. however, **bitching** that these are problems
that
need to be
I think what you're referring to is called process accounting. I
don't know about OpenBSD's support for this, though.
RJ
On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Nikns Siankin wrote:
If you get money from selling CDs/soft, its just clearly unfair to not
support it. Yes, I'm talking about stable ports.
Actually, the OpenBSD OS is supported. Your argument is pointless.
Stable ports are NOT supported because, well, it's
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:53:35 -0800
johan beisser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bitching and whining get you nothing.
When will you people stop responding to whiners like this!? He's
bitching and your just bitching back.
Leave the ignorant fool alone, and he will stop barking up your three!
It's not
Jason George wrote:
My spamd-setup always takes 20-30 minutes on two servers (4.1 and 4.2).
This is not normal? When I run it manually; most of the time is
spent downloading traplist.gz
You are all connecting to beck@'s machine at the University of Alberta
(www.openbsd.org) ?
I use the
Dan,
The blocked while grey listed number of 8 is dependent on the amount of
retries the remote mail server attempted while grey listed. Comcast servers
for example will try once per minute to deliver their mail. For example, if
you grey listed comcast for 25 minutes the blocked number would be
Hey guys!!! (with special request for Theor pls!)
Theo, I need a favor big guy! (only an easy one this time, I swear to it
sir! LOLSLS)!
See, we have the audit happening here at the bank this time and it's
causing me a lot of headaches and pains. A whiles back I replaced Cisco
stuff here
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Bilano
Excerpt:
Last name of Billy B. Bilano troll genius. Mr. Bilano posts
incredibly plausible-sounding pleas for help on various alpha geek
mailing lists...
Is January some kind of official troll month? Why can't it be the
shortest month of the year?
***
Analogy: You're on a highway with a posted speed of 100 km/h. You want
to operate your car and your car only 25 km/h only on the 100 km/h
highway.
***
And for this happy privilege, you want to impose the attendant nuisance
(highway analogy), read overhead (o/s analogy), on all the other
On 01/14/08 12:27, Richard Stallman wrote:
And who controls GPL? What will you do when all GPL software and
subsequent
developments are kept on servers out of reach of users (BSD
situation...)?
You are making an extreme projection, which I doubt will happen.
I see more revenue
On Jan 14, 2008 6:00 PM, Billy B. Bilano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See, we have the audit happening here at the bank this time and it's
causing me a lot of headaches and pains. A whiles back I replaced Cisco
stuff here with OBSD and pf and OpenBPG and all that jazz because you
(you = Theo)
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:07:35PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Marc Balmer wrote:
Nikns Siankin wrote:
Facts about OpenBSD:
# Stable release cycle. If you want to run latest bugfree ClamAV or
FireFox - upgrade to CURRENT! But don't forget to buy release CD's!!!
# Secure By
Brian,
After your post (and several others), I tried BitTorrent out on my
network (sparc64 router + DOCSIS 2.0 cable connection; see
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=120019379210857w=2)
After some experimentation, I was able to determine that running
BitTorrent with a large number of
On Jan 14, 2008 4:06 PM, Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian,
After your post (and several others), I tried BitTorrent out on my
network (sparc64 router + DOCSIS 2.0 cable connection; see
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=120019379210857w=2)
After some experimentation, I was able
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Calomel wrote:
Dan,
The blocked while grey listed number of 8 is dependent on the amount of
retries the remote mail server attempted while grey listed. Comcast servers
for example will try once per minute to deliver their mail. For example, if
you grey listed comcast for
I've always had consistent success with a crossover cable and ssh. Serial
connections with Wrap and Alix can be hit and miss and it's hard to see
why it worked yesterday but not today. You may consider spending the
pesos on the cable instead of coffee, cigarettes or aspirin.
Are you in BA?
On Jan 14, 2008 6:30 PM, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My theory is that you're using a ... uh... well, not very good
connection that bogs down easily.
My connection normally works fine; even when I max out my 7Mb/512Kb
line. Running BitTorrent (even with a fraction of the bandwidth)
On Jan 14, 2008 5:00 PM, Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cause the latency issue. By contrast if I limit the number of
connections, BitTorrent can consume almost all of the bandwidth and
the issue will not appear.
Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specific to
--- Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specific to
DOCSIS cable modems). But if it makes Brian (or someone else's
problem) go away, then it is likely that this problem is not unique.
--MHC
Let me read through the
On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Brian wrote:
--- Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this problem is specific to my configuration (or specific to
DOCSIS cable modems). But if it makes Brian (or someone else's
problem) go away, then it is likely that this problem is not unique.
67 matches
Mail list logo
