On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 04:56:59AM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
I'm unable to have sound on both outputs available in Audigy. Perhaps any
Audigy owner could make a tip, how can I achieve that (if that's possible
at all, using current audio driver)?
OpenBSD 4.2
the original Audigy and
yes i did
i precise that i have installed openldap-client package before to get
the ldap libraries and this is what i get when building Squid:
Rosen Iliev a C)crit :
Hi,
I guess you didn't install openldap-client package?
Rosen
ComC(te wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to recompile SQUID
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
... Shrinking the kernel would be the only reason I would
have of touching the kernel as I'm not into trying out
experimental features. It would be too bad if config doesn't
do this...
Nick Holland wrote:
config strictly deactivates the drivers, it doesn't reduce
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
Dear all
haloo everyone, how to make my openbsd machine working like opendns or
rbldns ...
--
sonjaya
http://sicute.blogspot.com
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:02:21PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
The question is which Audigy? Creative makes wide variety of cards sold
under that name and even the known one are sometime sold with different
chip version (usually undocumented when they switch a chip).
It's Sound Blaster
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:29:03AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
last I tried/heard, Creative wants an NDA to give out hardware specs.
I've looked at adding multi-channel support to emu(4). I'm guessing
that's what you mean by sound on both outputs. it's not likely
to happen. emu(4) is ugly
Thanks but that doesn't help me, could you explain please ?
Alexander Schrijver a icrit :
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Comhte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks but that doesn't help me, could you explain please ?
Alexander Schrijver a icrit :
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
I dont know how autoconf works which
Hello list,
is it possible to tunnel snmp through ssh?
From what I've found on the web openssh can't tunnel udp.
Just want to collect snmp data from ~10 hosts all over my network
without having snmp listen on an public available ip address.
--
Thank you
Chris
check out ssh-based vpn: ssh (1)
BR,
Stijn
Chris Cohen wrote:
Hello list,
is it possible to tunnel snmp through ssh?
From what I've found on the web openssh can't tunnel udp.
Just want to collect snmp data from ~10 hosts all over my network
without having snmp listen on an public available
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:04:09PM +0300, Lars Nood??n wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
... Shrinking the kernel would be the only reason I would
have of touching the kernel as I'm not into trying out
experimental features. It would be too bad if config doesn't
do this...
Nick Holland
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:02:21PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
The question is which Audigy? Creative makes wide variety of cards sold
under that name and even the known one are sometime sold with different
chip version (usually undocumented when they switch
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:29:03AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
last I tried/heard, Creative wants an NDA to give out hardware specs.
I've looked at adding multi-channel support to emu(4). I'm guessing
that's what you mean by sound on both outputs. it's not likely
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
You lost me here. Do you think that ALSA driver will help you any how to
produce oss driver?
You are aware of the fact that ALSA is 100% incompatible with oss and
that even 4Front Technologies
Yes, you're right; but I
I believe it was mentioned aways back in the message stream, but perhaps
it's worth reconsidering at this juncture...
Keep the low emi/rfi 386 machine user-proximity but convert it to an X
server with the more capable X client (app server) machine farther away.
-Original Message-
From:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:04:09PM +0300, Lars Nood?n wrote:
Using config to modify the GENERIC kernel's settings can apparently
improve boot speed. So maybe config should be mentioned in section 5.6
of the FAQ, Why do I need a custom kernel? to steer those wondering
about improving boot
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:41:26PM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:02:21PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
The question is which Audigy? Creative makes wide variety of cards sold
under that name and even the known one are sometime sold with different
chip
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 08:52:33PM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
You lost me here. Do you think that ALSA driver will help you any how to
produce oss driver?
You are aware of the fact that ALSA is 100% incompatible
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:52:20PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
if you want surround sound, check cmpci(4), uaudio(4), auvia(4) (though,
recording is broken on 8233 based devices) or maybe azalia(4). and
definitely upgrade to 4.3 when it's released (or run -current, especially
if you want to
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:05:16PM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:52:20PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
if you want surround sound, check cmpci(4), uaudio(4), auvia(4) (though,
recording is broken on 8233 based devices) or maybe azalia(4). and
definitely upgrade
On 2008-03-30, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. I'm asking about this, because I'm wondering, how difficult could be to
port softphone application to OpenBSD - I'm considering two: linphone and
tclphone. It's very likely, that the latter would be much easier. And
exactly when using
There have recently been some changes that make that driver
work much better, try again with a newer snapshot in a few days.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 07:55:16PM -0700, James Hartley wrote:
As opposed to previous mention that the Ethernet interface is
correctly identified on a 28 Jan -current
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:52:20PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
if you want surround sound, check cmpci(4), uaudio(4), auvia(4) (though,
recording is broken on 8233 based devices) or maybe azalia(4). and
definitely upgrade to 4.3 when it's released (or run -current,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:22:14PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
OpenBSD 4.3 is including PJSUA
http://www.pjsip.org/pjsua.htm
I tried it and I really like it. If you compare various SIP clients you
should see that PJSUA should be a first
choice for security minded user which prefers
I am running 4.1 on several servers, one thing I found was the
surprise on needing the X package to install some of the non x-windows
ports due to dependencies within that tree. I think it was for the
graphics libraries, either way, I installed the x packages and all is
well.
But I remember
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running 4.1 on several servers, one thing I found was the
surprise on needing the X package to install some of the non x-windows
ports due to dependencies within that tree.
Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
I am running 4.1 on several servers, one thing I found was the
surprise on needing the X package to install some of the non x-windows
ports due to dependencies within that tree. I think it was for the
graphics libraries, either way, I installed the x packages and all is
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
...
So perhaps to add to this entry for the FAQ, something that address this
desire to shrink the kernel to save memory:
... For standard i386 old computers with little ram,
recompiling the kernel does not provide enough free memory to
affect what
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:00:54 -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
The online upgrade documentation [1] is fairly vehement about its
recommendation regarding the use of the install kernel when upgrading.
I was wondering why? What dangers await someone going down the remote
upgrade path?
/juan
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:04:34PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
HOWEVER, the 80386sx was a non-starter for a long time: these machines
only had 24 bit address buses, so it had a max of 16M, and being they
were cheap machines, the actual potential of most of the hardware
they were used in was
Hello,
We're trying to use the :peer modifier to minimize the number of macros
in our pf configuration files.
For some reason we can't get it to work:
# cat /etc/pf.conf
set skip on lo
block log
pass in quick on fxp0 inet proto tcp from fxp0:peer to fxp0 port ssh
# pfctl -n -f /etc/pf.conf
We're trying to use the :peer modifier to minimize the number of macros
in our pf configuration files.
For some reason we can't get it to work:
# cat /etc/pf.conf
set skip on lo
block log
pass in quick on fxp0 inet proto tcp from fxp0:peer to fxp0 port ssh
# pfctl -n -f
33 matches
Mail list logo
