On 2008-07-26, J Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I moved back to an earlier version of OpenBSD on the DNS server, and
the Ironport traffic went up to normal, and the DNS lookup failures stopped.
Cpu utilization went back down to around 9%. But I'm vulnerable.
Sending spam seems a good way to
Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
that at least its wired network port works...
I tried to search on the ibm web site but all it says
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Sunnz wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
that at least its wired network port works...
I tried to
2008/7/27 David Vasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Sunnz wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has OpenBSD running on a G40, I have been
considering to pick up a second hand one for experiemental with
OpenBSD, trying out new code and stuff... it would be nice to know
that at least its
Hello all
I've found that my spamd on OpenBSD 4.2 stable box stopped logging
information provided by -v flag.
I did not make any changes on my box in last few days at least I think.
(except named build)
It was working without any problem for several months. Now, all I can get
from spamd into
Hello
do you think a soekris 4801 or 5501 can handle 2 to 4 usb video cameras
with the new uvideo driver ?
handle, in a way, get it on the box and record on a local hard disk or
stream it (with vlc server for example)
resolution and ips could be restricted but could it be possible ?
thanks
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:12 PM, J Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder is anyone is seeing performance issues with the patched DNS in the
late snapshots?
I installed the July 22 snapshot on our DNS servers, which handle a pretty
heavy load of lookups, mostly for anti-spam action.
It was
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for an implementation of BIS (Bump in the stack) or
another mecanism to provide access for IPv4-only users to the IPv6
world.
There's faithd and others TRT daemon but it's for
I threw my git saving throw so I was able to avoid looking at it.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:09:49AM -0400, bofh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:01:33PM -0400, bofh wrote:
saw
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
I couldn't find witch of the three possible value the -l option of the
cron refer to in the man page and look at the code in
/src/usr.sbin/cron/atrun.c that use the getloadavg(la, 1) to get that
value, the first of 3 if
Hey All,
I am reading through some of the documentation on SSH and popa3d, and
I am not quite sure how to configure my mail server for secure POP3
that other clients can use without using additional tools such as
stunnel. I am reading the ssh(1) man page, and I actually found some
interesting
cp /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.13.0 /usr/lib/libcrypto.14
Don't knock it, it works.
Don't do this, because one day I might purposely show you the
consequences of it.
saw
http://madwifi.org/wiki/news/20080725/ath9k-atheros-unveils-free-linux-driver-for
and was just curious if this is true 'open source' or is it full of magic
numbers...
I have a question for you, actually.
Have you not been listening every single time when we ask for the documentation?
Just a simple question: is the OpenBSD patch for bind is the same
solution as ISC ? Are they use the same RN ?
The patch release for older OpenBSD releases contains the same horrid
solution that ISC came up with, since it is 100% their code. Of
course, the bind included in all OpenBSD releases
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a question for you, actually.
Have you not been listening every single time when we ask for the
documentation?
I have, unfortunately. From the announcement, it sounded open source but
undocumented, and also in
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have, unfortunately. From the announcement, it sounded open source but
undocumented, and also in conjunction with mad-wifi folks, so I didn't have
high hopes. I was just hoping that someone decided to do the right thing.
i have search for keywords OpenBSD FAQ License but can found it. It's same
license with OpenBSD in http://openbsd.org/policy.html ?
if different where i can found BSD license for document not for binary or
source code or can i use BSD License for document?
thx for help
I'm trying to set up a Dell SC420 with 4.3. The machine has two SATA
hard drives and a PATA DVD drive. All that works fine.
Now I'm trying to add a PATA drive to copy data. When I either install
the PATA drive on the on-board controller or on a PCI PATA controller,
the machine boots from
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:00 AM, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went back and re-read the press release. It seems to be much worse than
first glance. [we hired X to] helps enhance regulatory compliance in the
Linux kernel. This probably means locking down the driver even more.
Pretty
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
http://linux.via.com.tw/ - the damned bastards released nothing but binary
drivers. And not even theirs at that!! (look at the filename -
via-unichrome This is a vendor, pretending to be offer open source
support
This is so simple if you know the answer, and very hard otherwise.
/etc/fstab will refuse to work unless the wd0 and etc are correct.
But after making a change in drives, whichever one is wd0 or wd1 will
change and booting fails.
This is easy to fix if you use vi or another editor.
But you
21 matches
Mail list logo
