Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
security policies on the website.
...
I read the documentation on the site already and would like to get some
more info about the process.
...
2) The OpenBSD and OpenSSH code is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
being
accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If there's a way to
get this via tcpdump I haven't found it yet.
Just increase the snaplen.
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
security policies on the website.
...
I read the documentation on the site already and would like to get some
more info about the process.
...
2) The OpenBSD and OpenSSH code is
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Janne Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
As I also said:
I used the same questions on all
projects I researched so they
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Janne Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
) ( ((
Vous avez des envies d'evasion ? Vous rjvez de rencontres et de dipaysement ?
Le Riad Schanez vous ouvre ses portes
Le Riad Schanez offre le calme et le confort d'un riad d'exception.
Ricemment rinovi, le Riad Schanez vous siduira par son charme, son patio
idialement utilisi et par sa
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Janne Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said twice above that you read all materials and couldn't figure out if
the code is always available or have periodic releases? Booo.
As I also said:
I used the same questions
On 2008-11-20, John Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
being
accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If there's a way
to
get this via
On 2008-11-20, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless you anchor/proxy all media as well on the
Asterisk (I don't know Asterisk so I don't know if it does that).
it does, and most people run it that way (canreinvite=no).
Hi.
I have a router with ip 192.168.0.1 and I get such messages in maillog when
cron try to send report:
router sm-msp-queue[3879]: mAFNUix6020927: to=root, delay=4+12:59:18,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=19473085, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred: Connection refused by
On 2008-11-20, Don Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would sure be nice if someone would create an OpenBSD port of
FreeSwitch.
I started but it doesn't work yet. If anyone's interested in
picking it up, mail me, but it is quite a challenge. Lots of things
are built internally that need
The wpi in my ThinkPad R60 has worked as flawlessly as those things do
for quite a while now, but after upgrading to the latest snapshot and
installing the
result of `ftp
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/wpi-firmware-3.0.tgz`
the system now claims the wpi wireless has been
hi,
quite a bit of work is being put into azalia. there have been quite
a few patches sent to tech@ and more will follow. if you want to
help with azalia, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and if you're not the kind of person who follows bleeding edge
development or doesn't like building
Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
Incase you are wondering
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
The wpi in my ThinkPad R60 has worked as flawlessly as those things do
for quite a while now, but after upgrading to the latest snapshot and
installing the
result of `ftp
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/packages/openbsd/wpi-firmware-3.0.tgz`
the system now claims
Hi all,
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be properly
understood how altq works. I need to guarantee 80% bandwidth to http, smtp, etc
(not udp services) of my DSL line. And the rest of this bandwidth to use for
udp
or other protocols. Of course, if any udp
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
properly
understood how altq works. I need to guarantee 80% bandwidth to http,
smtp, etc (not udp services) of my DSL line. And the rest of this
bandwidth to use for udp or other protocols.
Whyzzi wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
Incase
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
properly understood how altq works.
...
I have attached my pf.conf
this is way too complicated for you to get a good understanding
of how altq works.
please start with something simpler.
Is this rule perhaps catching
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I have a problem with altq on OpenBSD 4.4 firewall, but I can not be
properly understood how altq works.
...
I have attached my pf.conf
this is way too complicated for you to get a good understanding
of how altq works.
please start with something simpler.
I
unless you anchor/proxy all media as well on the
Asterisk (I don't know Asterisk so I don't know if it does that).
it does, and most people run it that way (canreinvite=no).
Good to know.
Thanks,
-Martin
Might simply be a bad card or even a bad setup, but I *believe* there
might be a problem with the re driver and was looking for some
external collaboration. I didn't think there was a need for a
cross-over cable. I tossed it in there trying to be thorough.
Thanks for the response! If this is
While most modern PATA drives (circa 2000/2001) have the ATA security features
included in their electronics, it is not clear to me how usable the atactl
security commands are for the typical OpenBSD admin with PATA drives.
1. Many BIOSes issue a FREEZE LOCK on discovery, disabling security
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 20:48, John Jackson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
I need, at a minimum, which virtual server at a particular IP address is
being accessed, and the contents of any GET commands (methods). If
there's a way to get this via
?A DONDE VAMOS A LLEGAR?
PEN DRIVE KINGSTON DE 64GB!
COMPARA PRECIOS!
KINGSTON
16GB : 18.6
32GB : 39.85
64GB: 77.25
SONY
INCLUE ADAPTADOR MEMORY STICK
MS PRO DUO 1GB: 6.95
MS MICRO M2 4GB: 12.10
MS PRO DUO 8GB: 24.50
MS PRO DUO 16GB: 36.97
SANDISK
MS MICRO M2 8GB : 24.10
PEN
On 2008-11-20, Whyzzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't think there was a need for a cross-over cable.
I tossed it in there trying to be thorough.
Some chips disable auto MDI/MDI-X when autoneg is forced.
in those cases you can't use a standard cable, you'll need
a specially wired cable (both
Whyzzi wrote:
Answers to your questions are inline /w the question
2008/11/18 tico [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Why is this sent to the ports@ mailing list ?
I've lurked the list for a long time - since around 2.8. I've asked
the odd question here and/or there, and got flamed once when I
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/atheros-5424-wireless-chipset-tp20610633p20610633.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:46 PM, jimerickso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/atheros-5424-wireless-chipset-tp20610633p20610633.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc
nope . . . but I have word that it's on the agenda.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=122397192803618w=2
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:46 PM, jimerickso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
jimerickso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
I currently have a Macbook Pro with an Atheros AR5424 chip, and it
works pretty well.
ath0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Atheros AR5424 rev 0x01:
I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a newer version
of the Portable OpenNTPD or is 3.9p1 the latest?
I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
at 4.3.
I meant latest Portable OpenNTPD, not OpenBSD. Sorry. :)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:32 -0500
Aaron W. Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
jimerickso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless chipset?
I currently have a Macbook Pro with an Atheros AR5424 chip, and
On 2008-11-21, Don Hiatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a newer
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, before anything else, I did read all material about the OpenBSD
security policies on the website. Now I am trying to get some more
insider insight on it.
Writing a paper about open source software
On 20:07:02 Nov 20, Jon wrote:
I have updated the /etc/myname with the server
I have updated the /etc/mygate with the comcast's gateway IP
I have set the IP address using ipconfig
? ipconfig?
the /etc/hostname.em0 has 'inet static IP 255.255.255.0 NONE' in it.
Shouldn't it be
inet
On 10:28:34 Nov 21, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
If you set named= in /etc/rc.conf.local you can use your
Typo. It should be
named_flags=
-Girish
Just wondering if anyone else on the list that has a realtek 8169s and
running 4.4 release and able to run a GigE connection from their
OpenBSD box to another GigE device, if they can maintain a complete
connection when they force the re driver via ifconfig to 1000baseT.
Might simply be a
thanks for the response.. I meant ifconfig..
also - how do I get the broadcast ?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Girish Venkatachalam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10:28:34 Nov 21, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
If you set named= in /etc/rc.conf.local you can use your
Typo. It should be
Also - after trying a few different options, basic connectivity (to the
modem) only works if the hostname.em0 say
inet xx.xx.12.145 xx.xx.12.0 NONE
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the response.. I meant ifconfig..
also - how do I get the
ok - so I figured out that my subnet mask is 255.255.255.252.. Changed it
still not working..
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also - after trying a few different options, basic connectivity (to the
modem) only works if the hostname.em0 say
inet
2008/11/20 Aaron W. Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:32 -0500
Aaron W. Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
jimerickso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does openbsd current have support for the atheros 5424 wireless
chipset?
I currently
On Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 20:07:02 -0800, Jon wrote:
the /etc/hostname.em0 has 'inet static IP 255.255.255.0 NONE' in it.
I can resolve using the gateway as my nameserver in /etc/resolve.conf
the thing won't allow any traffic to go out - I am trying to ping
yahoo.com...
But if i update
but that 9dhcp) is not the requirement. I would like help setting the static
IP on the node. this used to work - and after the 4.4 upgrade, I am having
issues..
any help folks...
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Maurice Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, November 20, 2008 at
45 matches
Mail list logo
