Hello,
Thanks for replying.
It is now the exact same behaviour as mentioned in the bug report and email
pending/6099 from Aaron W.Hsu.
The message starts when opening the cd. Disabling acpithinkpad stops the
message flood but it is still impossible to close the cd.
Kind regards,
Didier
2009/3/9 Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alface Voadora alface.voad...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you know about any installed firewall cluster that has pf+carp+pfsync
working along with ALTQ on a multi-gigabit configuration with an
acceptable
performance?
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:01:57 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have pf running on my firewall box and I'm experiencing some strange
behaviour. After several hours (this may even be 24 hours) of
functioning normally, pf seems to reload its default rules which means
that
On 08.03-11:13, Lo?=?VAI DC!niel wrote:
[ ... ]
I wish to experiment setting up a PPPoE server (AC) on OpenBSD 4.4.
Although I've read the pppoe(8) man page and googled around, it is not
clear for me how to set up such configuration.
man sppp
Hello,
I have a strange problem which I never had in the past when using a lenovo
laptop with a somewhat identical configuration.
I'm using CURRENT with a lenovo w500 (model 4063-34G). This model has one of
these switchable dual graphics.
(ATI Mobility Radeon FireGL V5700 + Intel's integrated
Si no puede ver bien el contenido de este boletmn, hacer clic AQUI
Publicar anuncio
www.mercadonica.com
Anuncios promocionados
Casas/Oficinas
Alquilo Oficina
PA : 150
Managua
Ver mas
Vendo Casa
PV : 40,000
Managua
Ver mas
Vendo Casa
PV : 50,000
Managua
Ver mas
Terrenos/Propiedades
Just a thought... on motorized cd/dvd drives you can use cdio
# cdio close
Nope ... returns the following error:
cd0(ahci0:1:0): Check Condition (error 0x70) on opcode 0x1b
SENSE KEY: Illegal Request
Didier
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:25:12PM +0100, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
We commented out the following lines, to test if it is indeed an
End-of-RIB-marker that is acting up, and it turns out it isn't.
in rde.c line 2613 we commented out this:
if (peer-capa_received.restart
Hi
I have been noticing these kernel messages once in
a while on my i386 machine running 4.3 (+ all patches
up to date). The drive is brand new 500GB SATA.
ichiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2e, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x00: timeout, status 0x0
ichiic0: abort failed, status 0x0
ichiic0: exec: op 1,
* Arnoud Vermeer arnoud.verm...@ams-ix.net [2009-03-08 22:54]:
No, this is not the only session. Here is the full config, I hope it helps:
Things start going wrong when I add the following to a v6 session:
tcp md5sig password hondjes
wait. removing tcpmd5 fixes the problem? you gotta be
Hello Misc,
I am a customer and not the network administrator, and someone in
the network makes MiTM attack, a network of billet in the
uncontrolled swithes and ISP will not translate everything on the managed.
Therefore, software implementation of this patch for openbsd.
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:09:31PM +1030, Damon McMahon wrote:
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:17:56 -0500 steve.shock...@shockley.net:
On 3/2/2009 7:31 PM, Damon McMahon wrote:
Is it possible/wise to follow the upgrade instructions on a non-live
OpenBSD disk mounted on /altroot? I have a second
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
I am a customer and not the network administrator, and someone in
the network makes MiTM attack, a network of billet in the
uncontrolled swithes and ISP will not translate everything on the managed.
Therefore, software implementation of this patch
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
I am a customer and not the network administrator, and someone in
the network makes MiTM attack, a network of billet in the
uncontrolled swithes and ISP will not translate everything on the
managed.
Therefore, software
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
by simple MiTM attack in arp protocol. How then can we talk about the
because it is.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:36:47PM +0200, irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:34:07PM +, michal wrote:
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
I am a customer and not the network administrator, and someone in
the network makes MiTM attack, a network of billet in the
uncontrolled swithes and ISP will not
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:36:47PM +0200, irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
by simple
Ticnico em
Prevengco de
Riscos Laborais
Todas as empresas necessitam de um plano de riscos laborais
Obtenha um
diploma
com futuro
Acesso 24 horas
ao nosso campus virtual
Com completo
material didactico
Um certificado que avaliza
os seus conhecimentos
Em menos de 6 meses!
CLICK JA
se nco
How do you define remote holes? Which remotely accessible services were
compromised by this?
Hey, somone hijacked facebook and I entered my password and submitted
it to them AND OPENBSD DID NOT SAVE ME OMG!!! OpenBSD is so
insecure.
There may or may not be a reason for applying sth
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:34 AM, michal mic...@sharescope.co.uk wrote:
Funny, I would say you are being more rude then he is
Why? Jacob was simply telling him why he was rude.
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's men seem to follow
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:36 AM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
When this is introduced in OpenBSD, so you can say with confidence
that the system really Secure by default ?
Then shouldn't you be using freebsd, and go bug them?
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
On 3/9/09 2:05 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:01:57 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have pf running on my firewall box and I'm experiencing some strange
behaviour. After several hours (this may even be 24 hours) of
functioning normally, pf seems to reload
Thank you all.
Thanks to your indications, i've found my problem.
It was just a block line (when i really looked at it, i still ask why she
was here) which was at the end of my block group.
I removed it, and my logging worked fine.
Pierre, yes i know all these things. I use pf since OpenBSD
* Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver debug...@gmail.com [2009-02-13 21:06]:
if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
Samba if not, NFS
NFS = Insecure
SAMBA = Have a problems, but, it's more secure.
that is the most ridiculous bullshit I have ever read
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator. And my OpenBSD were attacked,
by simple
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
How to protect your server from such attacks without the use of static arp
entries?
By freebsd 5.0 patch was written arp_antidote (
http://freecap.ru/if_ether.c.patch),
somebody could port it on openbsd?
Also, in
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
because it is.
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
project. But here we have a user that has security concerns, and
rather
If FreeBSD solve your problem, use it.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:10 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:36 AM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
When this is introduced in OpenBSD, so you can say with confidence
that the system really Secure by default ?
Then shouldn't
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like administrator.
So it wasn't default install anymore, was it ?
And my
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver debug...@gmail.com [2009-02-13
21:06]:
if you have a shared network between WINDOWS and OpenBSD i recommend
Samba if not, NFS
NFS = Insecure
SAMBA = Have a
Hello Misc,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
ARP is insecure, no matter how many patches you apply or how many hacks you
try. If you want something more secure, use 802.1X, use security on the
switch, use IPv6+IPSec/SeND, etc.
Sorry, if I been rude. I not
I've set up a chroot account using ssh's ChrootDirectory[1] keyword on
OpenBSD 4.4 on a Soekris (i386) net4801. It works nicely, except that I
get some device errors in the chroot, but not the regular accounts.
Upon connecting with SSH with the chrooted account, there is an error
about tty:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:10:00AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote:
Interesting, that is brings up a question for me... what do we do in
this case? My ISP seems to be content to give the same ip back over and
over again. If they did not is there something I can do besides monitor
my $ext_if
- Tethys wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
because it is.
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
project. But here we have a user that has
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:54:27 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana
felipe.alf...@gmail.com said:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
How to protect your server from such attacks without the use of static arp
entries?
By freebsd 5.0 patch was written
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:48:05PM +, - Tethys wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
because it is.
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
project.
If this issue matters to you and you want the OS to fix it you are doing
it wrong. ARP has some inherent qualities that are questionable. You
can hack ARP all up but it won't ever fix it so instead one needs to
embrace the issues and fix them where it makes sense.
This is not about an issue
At 04:50 PM 3/9/2009 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer, not like
WARNING: contains undecipherable part
Received: from unicornia896a8 (adsl-245-183-192-81.adsl2.iam.net.ma
[81.192.183.245])
by mail.cashcom.ma (Postfix/TrioOS) with ESMTP id 37DBD1200A3AE
for MISC@OPENBSD.ORG; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:12:59 + (WET)
From: Agence Casa ElFirdaous
2009/3/9 J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:01:57 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have pf running on my firewall box and I'm experiencing some strange
behaviour. After several hours (this may even be 24 hours) of
functioning normally, pf seems
Moving the chroot to a new CF with a different partitioning scheme meant
that it ended up on one mounted 'nodev', changing the mount options
fixed the problem.
-Lars
Dag Richards wrote:
In sort my first guess is your IP is changing every 24 hours or so due
to your service provider using dynamic addressing (and trying to
prevent you from having a particular IP for too long). If I'm right,
then your problem is that pf is holding on to the old rules for your
Hi All,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:50 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net
wrote:
I was clearly out of place.
Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email
address
and have wrongly concluded to an
Ah, different semantics. :-) By default rules I mean whatever pf
does *without* an /etc/pf.conf. Probably something like block all.
Without any rules, pf does not block anything.
come on.. stop making assumptions.
I've run an intial pilot of a Soekris net4801 with OpenBSD 4.4, using
gpioctl to turn on and off other machines and netboot them for console
installs. The notes below are a mess and there just to record until
they can be arranged to make sense:
Hello Paul,
The problem is that, I am not an administrator of the network.
I am a client of the network. The network is built on the unmanaged switches.
ISP to the problem do not care, so interested in this patch. May you
help with patch on OpenBSD ?
Monday, March 9, 2009, 3:02:23 PM, you
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Eric Furman ericfur...@fastmail.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:54:27 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana
felipe.alf...@gmail.com said:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
How to protect your server from such attacks without the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
Depends on whether it is a valid concern. I believe it was pointed
out in the other thread
Hi Daniel and Misc@,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:29:22 +0700, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net
wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer
about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your
The problem is that, I am not an administrator of the network.
I am a client of the network. The network is built on the unmanaged
switches.
ISP to the problem do not care, so interested in this patch. May you
help with patch on OpenBSD ?
The network is built wrong.
No, we will not
Paul Irofti wrote:
Hello Mr. Troll, thanks for flaming by. Have a good day!
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
stupidity.
# Han
On 2009-03-09, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
In www.openbsd.org wrote Only two remote holes in the default
install, in more than 10 years!, this not true. I using OpenBSD
like customer,
On 2009-03-09, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
ARP is insecure, no matter how many patches you apply or how many hacks you
try. If you want something more secure, use 802.1X, use security on the
switch, use IPv6+IPSec/SeND, etc.
2009/3/9 bofh goodb...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's a troll. Maybe not. Can we afford to be turning away
potential users on the off chance?
OpenBSD exists solely for the developers
That's a silly thing to say.
--
jm
Hi Henning and Claudio,
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Btw. does this only happen with full IPv6 feeds or are a few
announcements already enough?
We have two test setups. One actually includes real peers, none sending
a full table though. The other one is a setup in our lab, with various
routers we
On Mar 09 15:48:05, - Tethys wrote:
Maybe it's a troll. Maybe not.
Take a wild guess.
Can we afford to be turning away
potential users on the off chance?
Assuming that we means the dev team, of which
neither you or me are members, then yes, we can.
--
The greatest shortcoming of the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
because it is.
And therein lies some of the problem with the OpenBSD community. Don't
get me wrong, I like OpenBSD, I use it, and have donated to the
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:18:59PM +0200, irix wrote:
| Hello Paul,
|
| The problem is that, I am not an administrator of the network.
| I am a client of the network. The network is built on the unmanaged
switches.
| ISP to the problem do not care, so interested in this patch.
As has been
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:34:07PM +, michal wrote:
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
I am a customer and not the network administrator, and someone in
the network makes MiTM attack, a network of billet in the
uncontrolled swithes and ISP will not
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Didier Wiroth
didier.wir...@mcesr.etat.lu wrote:
b) Now, if I bypass the authentication and boot directly into openbsd.
The openbsd kernel is loaded, but now I'm _NOT_ able to start X11.
Here is the NON-working Xorg.0.log:
On 9 March 2009 P3. 21:29:47 Juan Miscaro wrote:
2009/3/9 bofh goodb...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, - Tethys tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's a troll. Maybe not. Can we afford to be turning away
potential users on the off chance?
OpenBSD exists solely for the
Hi,
thanks for answering to Mitja and you.
On Sat, 07.03.2009 at 19:28:09 +0100, Heinrich Rebehn
reb...@ant.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Am 06.03.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Toni Mueller:
223644.842092 Plcy 30 keynote_cert_obtain: failed to open /etc/
isakmpd/keynote//u...@road-warrior/credentials
2009/2/28 Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
On 2009-02-28, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the standard way of generating hashes (for me it's for
passwords) in OpenBSD? B I once used userdbpw but it's package
(courier-authlib-userdb) conflicts with another package I have
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:07:51 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/9 J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:01:57 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have pf running on my firewall box and I'm experiencing some
strange
Hello Misc,
Theo and other, thanks.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Sorry to dredge this back up from a month ago, but I wanted to get some
clarification.
If I wanted to have a gateway that accepts https connections from clients
and then proxies them over to https servers am I just out of luck? Is it
that it cannot be done at all, or just that it cannot be done
L. V. Lammert wrote:
PMFJI, but isn't the issue simpler than that? If he has a MiTM attack via
arp, doesn't that mean the attacker has access to the local subnet?
Remote access to a machine on that subnet would do. It does not have to be
physical. Probably a compromised Windows box that
2009/3/9 J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:07:51 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/9 J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:01:57 -0700 Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have pf running on my
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
Click here to pick up your postcard
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and enter your
I'm seeing the following messages logged to the console:
acpitz0: THRM: failed to read _TMP
acpitz0: THRM: failed to read temp
(both lines are repeated many times).
It looks like OpenBSD (4.4) is unable to read the CPU temperature
which would explain why my previously whisper quiet box
73 matches
Mail list logo
