So what you actually want is create a ramdisk that recognizes NTFS. you're
not interested in a running kernel, but a boot kernel, right ?
Look around in distrib, that's where the instructions to build boot kernels
happen. You need to tweak/clone the right ramdisk for your purpose.
Of course, ther
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:13 PM, David Vasek wrote:
It is wrong becasue the computed numbers can be different from what is written
in the specification (the man pages). The computed load average can be high on
an almost idle machine and vice-versa. As is described here:
http://marc.info/?l=ope
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:13:01PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Aaron Martinez wrote on Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:37:54PM -0500:
> > blambert@ wrote:
>
> >> From a quick reading of release(8) and src/etc/Makefile, it looks like
> >> make release pulls the kernel from the running syst
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:13 PM, David Vasek wrote:
> It is wrong becasue the computed numbers can be different from what is
> written in the specification (the man pages). The computed load average can
> be high on an almost idle machine and vice-versa. As is described here:
> http://marc.info/
Hi Aaron,
Aaron Martinez wrote on Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:37:54PM -0500:
> blambert@ wrote:
>> From a quick reading of release(8) and src/etc/Makefile, it looks like
>> make release pulls the kernel from the running system into the generated
>> release.
/usr/src/etc/etc.i386/Makefile.inc, target
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:13:35PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
>> >> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
>> >> release.
>> >>
>> >> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a
On 13 March 2009 P3. 23:12:25 Aaron Martinez wrote:
> > On 13 March 2009 C#. 22:13:35 Aaron Martinez wrote:
> >> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
> >> release.
> >>
> >> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a
> >> GENERIC kernel is included
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:13:35PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> >> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
> >> release.
> >>
> >> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a GENERIC
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:13:35PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> >> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
> >> release.
> >>
> >> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a GENERIC
> On 13 March 2009 c. 22:13:35 Aaron Martinez wrote:
>> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
>> release.
>>
>> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a
>> GENERIC kernel is included with the release. I'm just wondering if
>> there is a way to in
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:13 AM, David Vasek wrote:
Perhaps the man page of w(1) should be changed. Currently it states:
The load average numbers give the number of jobs in the run
queue averaged over 1, 5 and 15 minutes.
which is rather inaccura
Hi Aaron,
> I'm just wondering if there is a way to include or replace the generic
> kernel with a modified kernel.
Of course, one can hack up the release(8) process to replace the GENERIC
kernel by a custom kernel. But i would call that confusing at best.
In case you have no idea where to start
On 13 March 2009 c. 22:13:35 Aaron Martinez wrote:
> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
> release.
>
> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a
> GENERIC kernel is included with the release. I'm just wondering if
> there is a way to include or
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:40:46PM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
> homepage? Other features like pf, carp, openssh, sparc64 support, etc.
> aren't mentioned at all on the front page of www.openbsd.org
Oops. OpenSSH is mentioned on the front page, albeit in a footnote that
lists "associated proje
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:13:35PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
>> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a
>> release.
>>
>> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a GENERIC
>> kernel is included with the release. I'm just wondering if there is a
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:13:35PM -0500, Aaron Martinez wrote:
> I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a release.
>
> I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a GENERIC
> kernel is included with the release. I'm just wondering if there is a way
> t
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Matthew Szudzik
wrote:
>> No doubt about that, but interest is seriously waning. I cared back
>
> Although interest in compat_linux may be "seriously waning" among
> developers, I think it's still important for users such as myself.
> compat_linux is the most reas
I'm running 4.4 Stable on i386 hardware and was wanting to make a release.
I was reading through the release man page and noticed it said a GENERIC
kernel is included with the release. I'm just wondering if there is a way
to include or replace the generic kernel with a modified kernel. The only
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:55:18PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Constantine Cusulos
> wrote:
> > Maybe compat_linux needs some additional work.
>
> No doubt about that, but interest is seriously waning. I cared back
Although interest in compat_linux may be "serio
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:13 AM, David Vasek wrote:
> Perhaps the man page of w(1) should be changed. Currently it states:
>
>The load average numbers give the number of jobs in the run
>queue averaged over 1, 5 and 15 minutes.
>
> which is rather inaccurate or wrong. I suggest the patch b
2009/3/13 Friedrich Locke :
> Hi folks.
>
> i am having a nightmare trying to get a directory exported read-only; then
i
> request for your help.
>
> I have a nfs server exporting some files read-only. In the client box i am
> using amd to mount them. It works but it is mounted read-write.
> Does a
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, jmc wrote:
>>
>> i believe that Theo and many of the devs have said many times that the
>> load average means nothing. here's a reference to one such thread:
>>
>> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/11/8/4041294
2009/3/13 David Vasek :
>
> Perhaps the man pa
Hi,
I'm in the process of upgrading and existing netBSD gateway to a fresh
new openBSD gateway.
So I have to re-create IPSec tunnel between other netBSD and Linux
gateways.
I have to precise I am more familiar with racoon/setkey than
ipsectl/isakmpd couple (in fact, it's the first time I use ipse
2009/3/13 Jean-Francois :
> BTW this thread helped me a lot (I was the originator) and I agree that
> NFS works a lot very well. Over Gigabyte network it's looking like
> really a local disk behaviour.
>
> I have still troubles copying videos because the Linux desktop
> constantly loads the litle s
Hi folks.
i am having a nightmare trying to get a directory exported read-only; then i
request for your help.
I have a nfs server exporting some files read-only. In the client box i am
using amd to mount them. It works but it is mounted read-write.
Does anybody have any ideia on what is going on?
ciscoad...@mail.ru escribio':
Michael Littlejohn wrote:
I am curious if anyone has a "HP, DVD Writer 840d"? If so, have you
experienced any problems?
The problem I am having is that when I try to mount it to /dev/cd0a or
/dev/cd0c, my machine
will completely freeze, requiring a reset. Additio
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Constantine Cusulos
wrote:
> Maybe compat_linux needs some additional work.
No doubt about that, but interest is seriously waning. I cared back
when Netscape and then Opera were the only reasonable browsers, but
that hasn't been true for years. The whole idea of
--- Artur Grabowski [Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:13:10PM +0100]: ---
> jmc writes:
>
> > block in log quick on $ext_if from to any probability 90%
> >
> > is because it seems a little bofh-ly to me. and i guess it borders on
> > security-through obscurity, which of course it not really security at
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:27:42PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a /20 and I want a announce half of it to peer21 and the other
>> half to peer2 only. How am I expected to do so? Using filters?
>>
>> Can anyone please m
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Comments?
>
Mar 13 08:52:01 crosscutmedia ftpd[1728]:
connection from pool-68-239-27-14.bos.east.verizon.net [68.239.27.14]
Mar 13 08:52:09 crosscutmedia ftpd[4218]:
FTP LOGIN FROM pool-68-239-27-14.bos.east.verizon
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, jmc wrote:
--- Gabri Mate [Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:58:15PM +0100]: ---
Hey there!
I have a Compaq DL580 G1 with 4x700Mhz PIII, 2GB RAM, 2x36GB U320 SCSI
on a HP SmartArray 5300 with 64MB BBU.
It's a general purpose 'hobby' server. The average concurrent
i believe that Th
Ferienunterkunft
vacation rentals worldwide
* secondcasa.com
* vacation rentals worldwide
* Reuchlinstrasse 23
* 72800 Eningen unter Achalm
* Germania
* Telefono/Telefax +49 (0)7123 2846889/2846892
* E-Mail i...@secondcasa.com
*
Greece
Gentili signore ed egregi signori,
> If you're just after interface counters, I would recommend using
> snmpd in the base OS instead, net-snmp is rather fragile.
>
>
I was hoping on using net-snmp so I could extended it a bit, but
interface counters is the most important thing right now. Perhaps
when net-snmp gets fixed for 4.4 I'
Just for the record, i compiled the following program on my Ubuntu/i386:
// hello.c
#include
int main() {
printf("Hello Puffy!\n");
return 0;
}
$ gcc -static -o hello hello.c
I copied the binary in /emul/linux/usr/bin, used dd as before, run it
and still i get "Bad system call (core dump
jmc writes:
> block in log quick on $ext_if from to any probability 90%
>
> is because it seems a little bofh-ly to me. and i guess it borders on
> security-through obscurity, which of course it not really security at
> all. but it seems a bit more sinister than just outright blocking, which
> k
Thank you for the reply.
I tought that is something simple, but i will install shapshot
Vhr`r nr James Wright :
> mail.bg> writes:
>
>>
>> Hi people!
>> I use OpenBSD 4.4 and i need to have perl-5.8.9. I upgraded it via
>> "perl -MCPAN -e shell", it installed successfully, but my pk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am experiencing the same thing on 4.3 with a very similar setup. I
can add that the downtime doesn't have to be very long for the OpenBSD
to get stuck. I also get messages like this:
Mar 13 02:36:34 akita dhclient[25444]: send_packet: No route to h
On 12 March 2009 c. 20:45:12 Constantine Cusulos wrote:
> I am trying to run a linux binary on my OpenBSD 4.4/i386 system. The
> binary file (let's call it 'fpc') is a static executable.
>
> So far, i have done the following:
>
> 1. I have modified /etc/sysctl.conf so that it reads
>kern.emul.l
Michael Littlejohn wrote:
> I am curious if anyone has a "HP, DVD Writer 840d"? If so, have you
> experienced any problems?
> The problem I am having is that when I try to mount it to /dev/cd0a or
> /dev/cd0c, my machine
> will completely freeze, requiring a reset. Additionally, when I installed
>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Vivek Ayer wrote:
> How do go about including gnuplot in the chroot? Do I just do ln -s
> ../../usr/local/bin/gnuplot? I thought symlinks could get away with
> chroots or are those restricted to /var/www as well?
The link talks about this subject. You need to see
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:30:38 +1100, SJP Lists wrote:
>2009/3/13 Rod Whitworth :
>
>>>You could have scrubbing turned off at the bride
>>
>> So what's she going to do? Just the dishes?
>> Why did he marry her anyway?
>>
>>
>
>Careful Rod, from memory Diana is a crack shot and packs!
>
Hey, I know
How do go about including gnuplot in the chroot? Do I just do ln -s
../../usr/local/bin/gnuplot? I thought symlinks could get away with
chroots or are those restricted to /var/www as well?
Thanks,
Vivek
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM, patrick keshishian
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:16 PM
BTW this thread helped me a lot (I was the originator) and I agree that
NFS works a lot very well. Over Gigabyte network it's looking like
really a local disk behaviour.
I have still troubles copying videos because the Linux desktop
constantly loads the litle snapshot of the vid file it is transfe
43 matches
Mail list logo
