I don't know what causes your problem, but I saw this:
2009/5/22 L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net:
t...@ted.com
Even though this email is listed correctly as a list member,
^-- Here you say that t...@ted.com is listed correctly as a list member.
when MD
receives an email from this
Uwe Dippel wrote:
Uwe Dippel udippel at uniten.edu.my writes:
To me this seems a result of the sequence at boot: at first we identify the
physical drives, that is sd0, sd1, sd2 and sd3 in this case, and only later
do we get softraid up, sensibly roaming the RAID one up. Sensibly? Because
fstab
www.publicarHoy.com
Publicar Hoy es un portal Argentino de anuncios clasificados gratuitos.
Publicar Hoy te ofrece un mitodo csmodo y facil para que personas en el
mismo pams o ciudad puedan vender o comprar todo tipo de
On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:21:14 +0200
Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 22:56:33 +0700
Edho P Arief edhopr...@gmail.com wrote:
perhaps you meant
pkg_add -i pkgname
That enters interactive mode and I'm presented with the correct
choices (as listed above) so,
On 2009-05-22, Justin Credible mista.justin.credi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running OpenBGPd on an OpenBSD 4.4 router.
Some times when traffic goes over one peer and finally gets to our router,
the last hop will respond as a different peer. For example:
Level3 IP 10.0.0.1
Global Crossing IP
Janne Johansson jj at it.su.se writes:
Isn't that the case with all fstab entries right now?
You get the computer to list some drive before other disks, raid or no
raid, and fstab breaks on you.
No, you didn't read it carefully enough. fstab breaks on me when I shove in a
drive 'before',
On Sat, 23 May 2009, ropers wrote:
I don't know what causes your problem, but I saw this:
No kidding! Wonder why I sent the email to the list!
Why would MD reject an email when it is listed in the list members?
2009/5/22 L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net:
t...@ted.com
Even though
And roaming should work however, your softraid volume will be bumped.
On May 23, 2009, at 8:26, Uwe Dippel udip...@uniten.edu.my wrote:
Janne Johansson jj at it.su.se writes:
Isn't that the case with all fstab entries right now?
You get the computer to list some drive before other disks,
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009, ropers wrote:
I don't know what causes your problem, but I saw this:
No kidding! Wonder why I sent the email to the list!
Why would MD reject an email when it is listed in the list members?
Your subject says it all; this is OT on this list; try
When you've got something to start with job it up on Sourceforge and pop us
a message on this list.
Maybe some of us have a use for the same application and will want to help.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Obiozor Okeke obiozorok...@yahoo.comwrote:
Thanks Ross/Ed, yes we're going to dump
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2009-05-22, Justin Credible mista.justin.credi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running OpenBGPd on an OpenBSD 4.4 router.
Some times when traffic goes over one peer and finally gets to our
router,
the last hop
I tried adding reply-to rules in my pf.conf so that traffic that comes in
on one interface will go out the same interface but that doesn't seem to
work either, since the reply from the wrong address happens before or during
the state that stateful connections are being established.
I should
Hi there,
I've update my base system and now everytime I ping something it gives
me a permission denied, if I run as root, averything is fine.
aleixo:ports: ping www.terra.com.br
ping: socket: Permission denied
There is no device for a socket correct ?
Thanks.
--
Christiano Farina HAESBAERT
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:36:30PM -0300, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote:
I've update my base system and now everytime I ping something it gives
me a permission denied, if I run as root, averything is fine.
Is it safe to assume that you updated your base system using tar?
Did you forget the
Hello @misc:
I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.5 (i386) onto my Soekris 4501.
Unfortunately, I cannot seem to get PXEboot to work properly. I setup
my host machine in accordance with the FAQ and I have tested it
locally with the tftp client (i.e., I can successfully execute a 'get
bsd.rd' from
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:36:30PM -0300, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote:
I've update my base system and now everytime I ping something it gives
me a permission denied, if I run as root, averything is fine.
You have done something wrong during your update. ping must be setuid:
-r-sr-xr-x 1
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
Is it safe to assume that you updated your base system using tar?
Did you forget the -p flag for tar?
/sbin/ping is an SUID binary.
Hmm, I might, I will have to untar again I believe, any other ideas ?
Thanks.
--
Christiano Farina
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:54:41PM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
ping must be setuid:
...and owned by root. Mike is probably onto something ;-)
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 05:52:49PM -0300, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
Is it safe to assume that you updated your base system using tar?
Did you forget the -p flag for tar?
/sbin/ping is an SUID binary.
Hmm, I might, I
On 2009/05/23 13:57, Justin Credible wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2009-05-22, Justin Credible mista.justin.credi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running OpenBGPd on an OpenBSD 4.4 router.
Some times when traffic goes over one peer
On 2009/05/23 14:01, Justin Credible wrote:
I tried adding reply-to rules in my pf.conf so that traffic that comes in
on one interface will go out the same interface but that doesn't seem to
work either, since the reply from the wrong address happens before or during
the state that
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2009/05/23 13:57, Justin Credible wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009-05-22, Justin Credible mista.justin.credi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am running
Hi Misc@,
I'am currently running 23rd May i386-current, and I experience some
booting speed up, and some changes in BGP, and yes, I'am aware of bgpd
current code update.
So, What I did was;
$ bgpctl sh rib 129.128.0.0
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
origin: i =
Hi there,
I am running OpenBSD 4.4 with OpenBGPD and multiple peers.
For some reason the device is selecting Level3 as the default route for
absolutely everything which is not statically set.
On Level3 config i have set:
set localpref 100
softreconfig in yes
max-prefix 100 restart 300
For the
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Justin Credible
mista.justin.credi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am running OpenBSD 4.4 with OpenBGPD and multiple peers.
For some reason the device is selecting Level3 as the default route for
absolutely everything which is not statically set.
On Level3
25 matches
Mail list logo
