Le 27/05/2009 15:38, Stuart Henderson a icrit :
Simon Morvangar...@zone84.net wrote:
After a couple of hours/days one of the box stop functioning properly :
no ping, no more SSH access but I still capture CARP avertisement on the
network segments (when it occurs on the master). As a
I bought a new Wireles USB device, using 5-29-2008 amd64 snapshot
That is an awfully old snapshot. You might want to use something from
this year.
Cheers,
Predrag
P.S. Sorry Sam I couldn't resist:-)
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether the platform is 64bit or not.
Am I right in assuming that OpenBSD only supports 32bit and 64bit
platforms at the moment?
Ted
# $OpenBSD: netstart,v 1.122 2008/07/23 16:05:47 sthen Exp $
# $OpenBSD: rc,v 1.318 2008/07/09 20:23:47 djm Exp $
# uname -a
OpenBSD node1 4.4 GENERIC.MP#1 amd64
On P, 2009-05-31 at 19:32 +0200, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-05-28, Georg Kahest ge...@viatel.ee wrote:
Hello, i
On 2009/06/01 12:55, Georg Kahest wrote:
# $OpenBSD: netstart,v 1.122 2008/07/23 16:05:47 sthen Exp $
# $OpenBSD: rc,v 1.318 2008/07/09 20:23:47 djm Exp $
# uname -a
OpenBSD node1 4.4 GENERIC.MP#1 amd64
It's not what I was thinking it might be then (there was a change
to the
This log from prefered (master node), it seems that the problem is carp0
takes master even before carp1 has went to backup, how to resolve it, so
that they would go master at the same time.
Jun 1 14:45:54 node1 /bsd: carp0: state transition: INIT - BACKUP
Jun 1 14:45:54 node1 /bsd: carp: carp0
i had modified rc conf a little and last log paste was because of that
modification, this is the current log, but still the client behind lan
carp loses its packets, first to his gateway with host uncreachable and
after few packets its timeout, and then everything starts working okey.
Jun 1
Okey i think i figured it out, the problem was with my switch spanning
tree, when i disabled it for appropiate vlans everything started to work
correctly.
On E, 2009-06-01 at 13:14 +0200, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009/06/01 12:55, Georg Kahest wrote:
# $OpenBSD: netstart,v 1.122
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether the platform is 64bit or not.
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit
Okey now that the failover seems to be work i have hit another problem,
the thing is when failover occurs and other node takes over, the client
connection wont hit right ALTQ queue anymore, rather it goes
unqueued(full speed) , and only the new connections initated after
failover will hit the
On 2009/06/01 15:57, Georg Kahest wrote:
Okey now that the failover seems to be work i have hit another problem,
the thing is when failover occurs and other node takes over, the client
connection wont hit right ALTQ queue anymore, rather it goes
unqueued(full speed) , and only the new
Yes the rulesets are identical, strange thing is from pftop it seems
that it hits default queue (25mbit queue) but somehow the client gets
10~MB/s what seems more of interface root queue value rather then that
default queue. Thou the real queue it should use is at 8mbit.
On E, 2009-06-01 at 15:09
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:56:50PM -0400, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
Is there a way in smtpd(8) yet, to do something like genericstables in
sendmail? Right now, when my client sendmail sends out a mail, it
rewrites the envelope and the From addresses to be valid email addresses
with the domain
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:11:29PM +0200, Jacek Masiulaniec wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:56:50PM -0400, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
Is there a way in smtpd(8) yet, to do something like genericstables in
sendmail? Right now, when my client sendmail sends out a mail, it
rewrites the envelope
On 2009 May 31, at 2:53 PM, Fred Crowson wrote:
How is your iMac getting its IP address?
When I manually set up the IP address (etc.) for the iMac, I get
several seconds of connectivity before the link goes dead. That
doesn't seem to be enough time to get a DHCP lease, though I do have
I want add keyword to PF's rule. I started with pfctl. Suppose I want
to add keyword spraychld.
So, I add field to struct pf_rule (as showed in diff below) and tried
to add keyword to pfctl's parse.y processor.
But it won't to compile.
Where I was wrong?
# cd/usr/src/sbin/pfctl
# make clean
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit arch.
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep LP64
#define _LP64 1
#define __LP64__ 1
It should also be ok to (ab)use LONG_BIT from limits.h, depending
on how the code is 64 bit specific.
Ciao,
Kili
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
You're right, we only support 32- and 64-bit platforms.
What?! No 128 bit support?! Oh my god, the sky is falling, how can
you secure stuff in only 64 bit, the sky is falling, etc etc! :)
Actually, what I want is
Hi all,
I've just upgraded to 4.5 and gkrellmd (gkrellm-server) package seems to have a
memory leak -- it's RAM usage is growing constantly and is at about 20M resident
now, less than one day after starting the machine.
Did anybody experience anything similar and knows a fix?
Thanks,
Lars
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:51:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether the
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
I bought a new Wireles USB device, using 5-29-2008 amd64 snapshot
That is an awfully old snapshot. You might want to use something from
this year.
Cheers,
Predrag
P.S. Sorry Sam I couldn't resist:-)
Sorry that
Greetings,
I'm looking at using a pair of OBSD systems to perform a couple of
functions,
+ ISP load balancing failover (using NAT)
+ Site to Site IPSec termination (via ipsec)
+ Egress Bandwidth Management (via PF)
+ Web/HTML Detailed usage reporting (via ??)
I've done the first
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
Hi all,
I've just upgraded to 4.5 and gkrellmd (gkrellm-server) package seems to
have a
memory leak -- it's RAM usage is growing constantly and is at about 20M
resident
now, less than one day after starting the machine.
Did anybody experience
On Friday 29 May 2009 05:24:33 Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi Misc@,
I'm currently looking for some OpenBSD-friendly (OpenSource/Free)
WebHosting Management software. My colleagues seem to find a hardtimes
for this kind of software works with OpenBSD.
Any clue and input appreciated.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:58:08PM -0400, Steven Surdock wrote:
Greetings,
I'm looking at using a pair of OBSD systems to perform a couple of
functions,
+ ISP load balancing failover (using NAT)
+ Site to Site IPSec termination (via ipsec)
+ Egress Bandwidth Management (via PF)
* Anton Maksimenkov anton...@gmail.com [2009-06-01 17:48]:
I want add keyword to PF's rule. I started with pfctl. Suppose I want
to add keyword spraychld.
So, I add field to struct pf_rule (as showed in diff below) and tried
to add keyword to pfctl's parse.y processor.
But it won't to
* Georg Kahest ge...@viatel.ee [2009-06-01 15:21]:
Yes the rulesets are identical, strange thing is from pftop it seems
that it hits default queue (25mbit queue) but somehow the client gets
10~MB/s what seems more of interface root queue value rather then that
default queue. Thou the real
Yup.
Fixed in current more than 2 months ago:
Excellent, thanks!
Lars
Hi,
Is there some code in the tree that like apache a few years ago stop
following the source for valid license reason, or was forked, kind of,
that would need or benefit from cleanup just like I did apache in 2004-2006?
Kind of disgraceful janitor work if you like, but that would be
On 2009-06-01, Steven Surdock ssurd...@engineered-net.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm looking at using a pair of OBSD systems to perform a couple of
functions,
+ ISP load balancing failover (using NAT)
+ Site to Site IPSec termination (via ipsec)
+ Egress Bandwidth Management (via PF)
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 07:50:59PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit arch.
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep LP64
#define _LP64 1
#define __LP64__ 1
It should also be ok to (ab)use LONG_BIT from limits.h, depending
on how the code is 64 bit specific.
Am Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:08:19 +0100
schrieb Edd Barrett vex...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Over at the TeX Live camp we are wondering if anyone is using the
binaries found on the DVD distributed by the TeX User Group on
OpenBSD?
...
Hi Edd,
please excuse if this may sound odd to you - but do those
Do the netstat ibytes and obytes counters wrap, and if so at what limit
do they wrap?
eg.
# netstat -nbI fxp0
NameMtu Network Address Ibytes Obytes
fxp01500 Link 00:10:f3:08:5c:69 1269729588 2520482812
Cam
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:02:28PM -0600, Cameron Schaus wrote:
Do the netstat ibytes and obytes counters wrap, and if so at what limit
do they wrap?
Yes, they will wrap. The limit is 2^64 - 1 so don't expect it to happen
anytime soon.
eg.
# netstat -nbI fxp0 NameMtu Network
I know you asked about pretty picture graphs, but I will second
Stuart's recommendation of nfdump. Graphs may be pretty but if
you want to dig into the data nfdump is very useful.
diana
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-06-01, Steven Surdock ssurd...@engineered-net.com
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are many
people, who are just starting up, and they could be of some help, if they
knew what to do. I think it would be a great idea of having a general list of
what needs to be done, in any way, and what should not. And the
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 05:05:09AM +0300, ??? wrote:
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are many
people, who are just starting up, and they could be of some help, if they
knew what to do. I think it would be a great idea of having a general list of
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:05 PM, PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are many
people, who are just starting up, and they could be of some help, if they
knew what to do. I think it would be a great idea of having
2009/6/2 patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:05 PM, PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are many
people, who are just starting up, and they could be of some help, if they
knew what
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:12 PM, PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/6/2 patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:05 PM, PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are
many
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:12:36AM +0300, ?? wrote:
2009/6/2 patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:05 PM, PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P:
e.yu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Personally, i think this is a really good question, because there are
many
people,
Thank you all for your replies, now i (and hopefully someone else)
know how thing
really are. Thank you again, and sorry for my bad English.
--
The best the little guy can do is what
the little guy does right
42 matches
Mail list logo
