Ola!
Novo site de Jornais e Revistas com as capas dos jornais do dia. Alim disso
pode receber um resumo diario de imprensa logo pela manhc, para ficar a par da
actualidade.
Subscreva... I gratuito.
ainda se habilita a ganhar um LCD TV Samsung de 32, ou noite gratuitas
em hotiis.
Clique
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Andrius V vezh...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to play with usb key yesterday. Yes, when I copied mbr from
the other computer, computers didn't hang anymore. Of course, that mbr
is not suitable to boot OpenBSD as it points to grub which doesn't
exist in this usb
Hello,
I installed openbsd 4.5, with 2 NICs : rl0 ; rl1
rl0 connected directly with internet
rl1 our network.
I configured dhcp and and added it in my rc.conf.local. Restarted the
openbsd box.
In my pf.conf, i added this line :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:16 PM, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
keep state
Hello, you're also missing 68. Just as a point, you shouldn't need tcp
at all, all 67,68 is udp, also keep state is implied now.
Cheers,
Steph
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:16:06PM +0400, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello,
I installed openbsd 4.5, with 2 NICs : rl0 ; rl1
rl0 connected directly with internet
rl1 our network.
I configured dhcp and and added it in my rc.conf.local. Restarted the
openbsd box.
In my pf.conf, i
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:42:49PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
Funny you should ask. I have an R500 and it works fine, excepting the
lack of ACPI support of course. The Fn-Mute key combo even works right
away, no configuring needed (magic!). It's super flimsy though, I've
had it's optical
2009/11/20 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com:
Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not worrying
because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone that's worked on
it and every package you've installed and every piece of hardware you've
installed, etc., etc. It's naive
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Does anybody use it happily?
I used in the past to read RIA novosti news web-site. It became useless
about 6-7 months ago when they upgraded to newer version of Flash.
Gnash is in my experience Flash 7 compatible at best.
On the another hand I am really impressed
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 68
my dhcpd.conf is a standard config...
my hostname.bge0 :
inet 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
if i configure a machine with
pass out log on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd
port 68 # for IPv4
pass out log on $int_if inet6 proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd
port 546 # for IPv6
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:08 PM, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if
Hi,
I notice the ping time of my Soekris server is pretty veriable. When the server
is idle, the ping time (from a stable connection) is constant +/- 8ms. Then, I
start rain(6) on the server, via ssh, and the ping times immediatly increases
to an average of +/- 25ms :
64 bytes from
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:08:06PM +0400, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 68
my dhcpd.conf is a standard config...
my
I start rain(6) on the server, via ssh, and the ping times immediatly
increases to an average of +/- 25ms :
spltty splnet; man spl for further information
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:08:06PM +0400, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 68
my dhcpd.conf is a standard config...
my
If you have trouble seeing this mail, click here.
Top Shop
Top E-revija: 42, 24. novembar 2009.
Najbolja praktiD
na reE!enja i saveti za bolji Eivot
PoD
etna | Budi fit! | Lepota | Zdrav Eivot
DomaDinstvo | Zabava i deca | Quelle katalog | Knjige
Top Shop
HIT TV proizvodi!
FlavorWave Turbo
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:16:06PM +0400, open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello,
I installed openbsd 4.5, with 2 NICs : rl0 ; rl1
rl0 connected directly with internet
rl1 our network.
I configured dhcp and and added it in my rc.conf.local. Restarted the
openbsd box.
In my pf.conf, i
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
On the another hand I am really impressed by swfdec and swfdec-plugin.
You have to have the latest version 8.0 (plugin 8.4) from current.
2009/11/24 Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz:
I didn't have plugin installed, so I installed it.
But neither -current
open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 68
Clients most certainly don't send dhcp request packets to your gateway
but to multicast,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:37:58PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 68
Clients most
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Neither dhcpd nor dhclient need any pass rules in pf. Both tools use bpf
to steal the packets before they're checked by pf.
I see that has been there for a while.
Now that I look I see that dhcpd can add addresses to a PF table using
the argument -L. Useful!
Where are
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:37:58PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hello
i added theses lines :
pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
pass in on
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:45:25PM +0200, Lars Nooden wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Neither dhcpd nor dhclient need any pass rules in pf. Both tools use bpf
to steal the packets before they're checked by pf.
I see that has been there for a while.
Now that I look I see that dhcpd can add
Ici le corps de votre message.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
pub_internet.jpg]
Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Does anybody use it happily?
I used in the past to read RIA novosti news web-site. It became useless
about 6-7 months ago when they upgraded to newer version of Flash.
Gnash is in my experience Flash 7
Where are the details written up for how pf is bypassed by dhcpd and
dhclient?
Would that mean that the machine with dhcpd could still serve dhcp
requests despite a filter ruleset like this:
block in all
pass out all
Damn right it will.
Where is it written up? In the manual
2009/11/24 Andreas Mueller andr...@stapelspeicher.org:
Clients most certainly don't send dhcp request packets to your gateway
but to multicast, so set destination to 255.255.255.255.
Andreas
Looks like someone doesn't even know how dhcp works, but keeps
suggesting silly things and ignoring
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
No no no, listen to what claudio wrote. dhcp packets are grabbed by
dhclient or dhcpd before pf sees them.
That is very nice to know, i always thought it was filtered :)
Steph
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:17:39 -0800
patrick keshishian wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Forgot the version info:
OpenBSD 4.6
Forgot to mention 4.6-stable
setpci version 3.1.2
Is there a tool like strace or truss here?
ktrace(1)
And
Hi
I just upgraded from an august 4.6 snapshot to 4.6 release. All went
well, besides that my two onboard broadcom ethernet controllers do not
get or send any traffic!
uname -a
OpenBSD hal.freestone.net 4.6 GENERIC#58 i386
Output from dmesg:
bge0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev
Eugene Yunak wrote:
2009/11/24 Andreas Mueller andr...@stapelspeicher.org:
Clients most certainly don't send dhcp request packets to your gateway
but to multicast, so set destination to 255.255.255.255.
Andreas
Looks like someone doesn't even know how dhcp works, but keeps
suggesting
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:08:48 +0100, Matthias Cramer wrote
I just upgraded from an august 4.6 snapshot to 4.6 release
That's a -downgrade-. 4.6-release was tagged in early July. :)
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:08:48 +0100
Matthias Cramer cra...@freestone.net wrote:
Hi
I just upgraded from an august 4.6 snapshot to 4.6 release. All went
That was a downgrade not an upgrade.
4.6 was tagged/frozen before august.
Install a snapshot/-current and i guess your interfaces will work
* open...@e-solutions.re open...@e-solutions.re [2009-11-24 14:16]:
Using DHCP is not possible, pf block it
certainy not. dhc{p,lient} use bpf. outside pf. pf doesn't even see
those packets.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP -
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Peter Ericson
peter.eric...@bigpond.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:42:49PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
Funny you should ask. I have an R500 and it works fine, excepting the
lack of ACPI support of course. The Fn-Mute key combo even works right
away, no
Matthias Cramer wrote:
bge0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
(0x1002): apic 2 int 6 (irq 7), address 00:02:55:b7:3d:77
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5703 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2
bge1 at pci2 dev 5 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
(0x1002): apic 2
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Where is it written up? B In the manual pages. B I can't believe
we are here in 2009 and people still believe they can get away
with being an idiot because they believe they are above doing
research:
For the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54:54AM -0800, Gerald Chudyk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Where is it written up? B In the manual pages. B I can't believe
we are here in 2009 and people still believe they can get away
with being an idiot
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Where are the details written up for how pf is bypassed by dhcpd and
dhclient?
Would that mean that the machine with dhcpd could still serve dhcp
requests despite a filter ruleset like this:
block in all
pass out all
Damn right it will.
Where is it
Honorable Correspondant (e)
Dans le souci majeur du financement des projets, d'itendre son riseau partout
dans le monde avant la fin des fecirc;tes de cette annie 2009 et cilibrer la
fecirc;te de l'Internet (ricompenser les internautes de l'annie en cours), LA
BANQUE DU SUD en
Earlier today I upgraded my machine to the latest snapshot (nov 24) and
there seems to be a problem with X. It starts okay, but then shortly
after that it fails to respond to anything but the mouse. Also, the
programs that I have running stop (ff35, mplayer, etc). I tried under both
scrotwm and
Hi again
@Nick: It seems that you're right. OpenBSD creates *.tgz package from source
and stores it in /usr/ports/packages/i386/all and after that the package is
automatically installed, but the problem is that package is not installed
in the end. Even tryied to install the package manually but
Gerald Chudyk wrote:
For the record:
Thanks to this thread I discovered another idiot in this very cubicle
who failed to perform proper research and was sometimes setting pf
rules to pass dhcp messages. Particularly when troubleshooting a dhcp
problem. I beat him severely, but it probably won't
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Neal Hogan nealho...@gmail.com wrote:
I've even upgraded via source since the above upgrade to see if the issue had
been fixed since the release of the snapshot and X fails to build.
error
/usr/xenocara/driver/xf86-video-intel/configure[3]: syntax error: ''
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mateusz Gierblinski
mateusz.gierblin...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/24 Olivier Cherrier o...@symacx.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:39:02PM +0100, mateusz.gierblin...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm playing around with some security tools and I would like to test out
the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:48:24PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Neal Hogan nealho...@gmail.com wrote:
I've even upgraded via source since the above upgrade to see if the issue
had
been fixed since the release of the snapshot and X fails to build.
error
--Good luck verifying the mathematics yourself, though.
No small statement, that
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:42:48PM -0500, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
2009/11/21 AG computing.acco...@googlemail.com:
Depends on whether one trusts the NSA or not.
That's the nice thing about open source software;
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:58:18PM -0600, Neal Hogan wrote:
Earlier today I upgraded my machine to the latest snapshot (nov 24) and
there seems to be a problem with X. It starts okay, but then shortly
after that it fails to respond to anything but the mouse. Also, the
programs that I have
Hello all,
Willing to suffer scorn if I've missed a commit message or previous post on
the matter, but I've been getting a 404 for these two lists since
approximately the `unplanned maintenance' www event of a few weeks ago. Shall
I comment them out of spamd.conf, or will they make their return?
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:55:49 -0800, Jason LaRiviere wrote:
Hello all,
Willing to suffer scorn if I've missed a commit message or previous post on
the matter, but I've been getting a 404 for these two lists since
approximately the `unplanned maintenance' www event of a few weeks ago. Shall
I
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:11:57PM +0100, mateusz.gierblin...@gmail.com wrote:
@Nick: It seems that you're right. OpenBSD creates *.tgz package from source
and stores it in /usr/ports/packages/i386/all and after that the package is
automatically installed, but the problem is that package is
Red Midnight wrote:
Whenever I use a default block *log* rule to keep an eye on things, it
can be noisy. To help a bit (even though they don't actually do
anything), I use rules like this just to keep it out of the pf logs
That can be way too noisy. You can do 'regular' logging to pflog0 as
51 matches
Mail list logo
