I'm writing here, because the ssh dev list says:
Mail Delivery Status Notification (Delay)
[Status: Error, Address: openssh-unix-...@mindrot.org, ResponseCode 451,
Temporary failure, please try again later.]
So:
What is you're opinion about the next idea? Please write down ++/-- thoughts:
Isn't limiting the number of retries obtaining the same result? I mean,
limiting the number of retries to 5 and having to wait for 10 seconds after
five failed attempts will have the same outcome without the hassle, IMO.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:58:53 -0700
nagygabor88 nagygabo...@zoho.com wrote:
IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
1. You can limit connections using firewall.
2. You already have the feature by name limiting the number of
retries
3. If you really want PROTECTION - you should turn off password
authentication completelly and use RSA key with passphrase.
On Wed,
Don't reinvent wheel
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nagygabor88 nagygabo...@zoho.com wrote:
I'm writing here, because the ssh dev list says:
Mail Delivery Status Notification (Delay)
[Status: Error, Address: openssh-unix-...@mindrot.org,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
1. You can limit connections using firewall.
2. You already have the feature by name limiting the number of
retries
3. If you really want PROTECTION - you should turn off password
We don't support pciide at cardbus yet.
The cardbus code ideally needs to be folded into the pci
code, this would solve these kinds of problems but is quite painful
to do.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:30:10AM +0100, iproudlyeat...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a Delock 2xeSATA PCMCIA card that isn't
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:00:18PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
Unless you enable root login...
How does that help?
currently not but this machine will be a DB server (Postgresql + Mysql) and
it was aksed if we could go beyond the 8G.
In any case, for now, if I can address 8G physical memory is fine.
Thanks for your feedback
Tony
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2011 20:22, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
1. You can limit connections using firewall.
2. You already have the feature by name limiting the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:00:18PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:22:44 +0200, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
1. You can limit connections using firewall.
2. You already have the feature by name
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
Unless you enable root login...
Anybody there was able to compile darkice on OpenBSD 4.8 or -current ?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr eject.in...@gmail.comwrote:
I got source from anoncvs and then added include to .cpp files
#include /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/compat/pselect.c
now I'm getting next error:
2011/3/30 Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com
currently not but this machine will be a DB server (Postgresql + Mysql) and
it was aksed if we could go beyond the 8G.
In any case, for now, if I can address 8G physical memory is fine.
..which you cant.
--
To our sweethearts and wives. May
[IMAGE]
Wsi y Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presentan:
Congreso Nacional Internet Marketing Evolution este 11 de abril Ciudad de
Mixico.
Digital Marketing, Social Media, Search Engine Optimization, Realidad
Aumentada y mas
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005
Smguenos
Ok, now we have been doing some testing and probably found the problem.
All tests were done on the same machine with an Intel S5000VSA MB and a
Xeon E5420 2,5 Ghz processor, running OpenBSD 4.8 amd64 GENERIC (SP
kernel).
We tested the performance with iperf, running two clients connected
through
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/3/30 Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com
currently not but this machine will be a DB server
Could you donate a dual port card to the project if you replace them?
I would like to figure out why some em(4) perform badly while the same
chip on a different card seems to perform as expected.
Can you provide the vmstat -zi output of the 4 port card? I wonder how
the interrupts are shared on
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:22:19PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Yes, the limit still exists. Work on that is progressing, but slowly.
I don't think 4.4 was shipped with bigmem enabled. CVS
Marzo 2011
Curso de Nominas 2011
VisiC3n Humana (ConsultorC-a en Recursos Humanos) tiene el agrado de invitarlo
al Curso de NC3minas 2011 que se llevarC! a cabo en el mes de Abril
de 2011.
OBJETIVO: Conocer las disposiciones legales y procedimientos para realizar al
correcto cC!lculo de una
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:22:19PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
physical vs virtual memory, as has been explained already
it's no longer 1950; we've got this thing called swap
Thanks
Hello,
I am having problems with some network card on 2 appliances that i just
bought.
Indeed, two network card (82575EB chipset) are not recognized correctly.
I get the following error message :
/em0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000 PT (82575EB) rev 0x02: cannot
find i/o space
em1 at pci2
On 03/30/11 05:21, Tony Berth wrote:
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Worse, an amd64 kernel looking at 8GB of real, physical ram only makes a
wee bit under 3GB available.
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #852: Sun
Please click here if the e-mail below is not displayed correctly
Cast in Style
www.castinstyle.co.uk
Beautiful Cast Iron Home and Garden Ware
IT'S THE LAST DAY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE - ENDS TOMORROW
For the whole of March we are giving away FREE products. Buy 5 of
anything you like on our web site
Having problems viewing this email? Please click here.For enquiry, please send
email to powert...@epromotion.com.hk
eg!f3i1h.d;%d8 ge'e.9o h+ f f-$.ef
d;;d=f %h)h+ i;i5h3 powert...@epromotion.com.hk
ef f(d8
f3e
f6e0fegd?!d;6o h+ f ih#ie.
On 30 March 2011 09:06, Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote:
We don't support pciide at cardbus yet.
The cardbus code ideally needs to be folded into the pci
code, this would solve these kinds of problems but is quite painful
to do.
Would an expresscard work?
I have loaded the machine with processes and I think it consumed
slightly more than 4G physical, running 3 compiles at once. OpenBSD
userland (make -j4) + Clang/LLVM (make -j4) + ITK (make -j4). I was
checking with top -s3 -1.
OpenBSD just returns kernel page memory very very quickly, so it is
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:15:10 -0500
Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenBSD just returns kernel page memory very very quickly, so it is
difficult for it to consume more :). But seriously, after this
compile, kernel was holding onto some memory. At idle (after
compilation) it was an
On 2011-03-30 17.48, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 03/30/11 05:21, Tony Berth wrote:
I can't??? So the limit of 4G physical memory still exists? And why
was this
statement made from 4.4 release?
Worse, an amd64 kernel looking at 8GB of real, physical ram only makes a
wee bit under 3GB available.
I currently run the OpenBSD torrent tracker at
http://openbsd.somedomain.net
as well as the primary seeder but due to external circumstances I am no
longer able to continue hosting it.
I am looking for someone interested and able to take this over.
I am more than happy to help with
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:12:56 +0200
Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
On 2011-03-30 17.48, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 03/30/11 05:21, Tony Berth wrote:
Worse, an amd64 kernel looking at 8GB of real, physical ram only
makes a wee bit under 3GB available.
real mem = 3220111360 (3070MB)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:05:42PM +0100, iproudlyeat...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2011 09:06, Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote:
We don't support pciide at cardbus yet.
The cardbus code ideally needs to be folded into the pci
code, this would solve these kinds of problems but is quite
OpenBSD just returns kernel page memory very very quickly, so it is
difficult for it to consume more :). But seriously, after this
compile, kernel was holding onto some memory. At idle (after
compilation) it was an excess of 300-500M more, instead of 1-1.3G, it
was around 1.7G. Opensolaris
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-30 23:19]:
Might be okay for high physical memory machines but not low. I
remember Opensolaris also filled out bufcache for ZFS, which was a
bloated pig.
and ClaimsToBeOpen-Solaris' bufcache allocation strategies have
exactly what to do with
Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice.
OpenBSD opts for one strategy (bufcache = 10%) and Opensolaris opts
for another (bufcache close to 100%).
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-30 23:19]:
Might be okay for high physical memory machines but not low. I
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice.
OpenBSD opts for one strategy (bufcache = 10%) and Opensolaris opts
for another (bufcache close to 100%).
you are wrong.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de,
[IMAGE]
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico le presenta este programa:
Convencisn Nacional Secretarmas Ejecutivas y Asistentes 2011
22-23 de Julio, Playa del Carmen
Exclusivas conferencias presentadas por 3 Expertos Expositores
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005
Smguenos
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 01:09]:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice.
OpenBSD opts for one strategy (bufcache
On 03/30/11 19:18, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 01:09]:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Henning Brauerlists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice.
* Scott McEachern sc...@blackstaff.ca [2011-03-31 01:26]:
And what are we readers to wait for, anyway?
the bump.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers,
On 3/30/11 7:23 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 03/30/11 19:18, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 01:09]:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Henning
Brauerlists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just
where? please educate me.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just observing a comparison of default choice.
OpenBSD opts for one strategy (bufcache = 10%) and Opensolaris opts
2011/3/30 Peter Hallin peter.hal...@ldc.lu.se
Ok, now we have been doing some testing and probably found the problem.
All tests were done on the same machine with an Intel S5000VSA MB and a
Xeon E5420 2,5 Ghz processor, running OpenBSD 4.8 amd64 GENERIC (SP
kernel).
We tested the
Henning,
Hey you guys are going to bump up the default and enable bigmem as
default too? :) Is it scheduled for this hackathon?
Daniel,
Thanks, I will look into that. Undeadly is good.
OK,
I may be way off track and totally wrong here, but isn't that worked Bob did
may be two hacketon
[IMAGE]
Chers clients !
---
Pour la Nouvelle security de 2011 , Nous avons recemment examine votre
compte et nous avons besoin de plus d'informations sur votre entreprise
pour nous permettre de fournir un service ininterrompu. Jusqu a ce que
nous pouvons recueillir cette information,
If you use real hardware bigmen is default.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:57 -0500, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Henning,
Hey you guys are going to bump up the default and enable bigmem as
default too? :) Is it scheduled for this hackathon?
Daniel,
Thanks, I will look into that.
46 matches
Mail list logo
