Hi.
In smtpd.conf(5) ...
accept | reject
from network
The rule matches if the connection is made from the spec-
ified network.
What is the format for network?
From /etc/networks?
From DNS?
Other?
Best wishes.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 06:31:37PM +0930, David Walker wrote:
Hi.
In smtpd.conf(5) ...
accept | reject
from network
The rule matches if the connection is made from the spec-
ified network.
What is the format for network?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Joakim Aronius joa...@aronius.se wrote:
I have used Soekris for a few years and are very happy with them. They have a
new board that will start shipping soon: http://soekris.com/net6501.htm
Curious if anyone has tried these boards out. I'm looking for
Hi all,
I'm running 4.9 release with 2x usb hard drives in a softraid raid1 setup.
Both drives lost power so both volumes are degraded:
softraid0: trying to bring up sd3 degraded
softraid0: sd3 offline, will not be brought online
running the following doesn't fix the problem, I just get the
Politicas de Privacidad Si no puede ver esta informacisn haga click aqum
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Octubre
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Sabado
01
Oct.2011
[IMAGE]
NUEVOS SISTEMAS AUTOMATIZADOS DE DEVOLUCIONES Y COMPENSACIONES (FED
OBLIGATORIO A PARTIR DE SEPTIEMBRE)
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I don't actually need 4 NICs, I'm looking at the new Intel
S1200KP (mini-itx 1155 board with dual intel nics). I can put a g620t
and get the same power consumption rates as an atom d525, for the same
prices as the Soekris.
j00Z (4|\| \/\/r173 1|\| L337, j00Z R 4L$0 74L|1|\|9 b4D 4B0U7
/\/\1(r0$0Ph7. j00Z R $0 (00L! 1'/\/\ j00r 1D0L
and how does this relate to OpenBSD? Must I as a OpenBSD user hate
Microsoft?... oh, wait.. sorry Micro$oft
I think it's great that they has started to provide antivirus for free
again
Has anyone been following Microsoft's recent attempts to muscle OEMs into
using the secureboot feature of UEFI or is this just a load of media hot air?
Are there any plans for OpenBSD to support UEFI?
Thanks
On 01-Oct-11 13:40, Matt S wrote:
Has anyone been following Microsoft's recent attempts to muscle OEMs into
using the secureboot feature of UEFI or is this just a load of media hot air?
Are there any plans for OpenBSD to support UEFI?
Thanks
First off, the UEFI boot will *not* prevent
Why bother with something you don't like / use?
Personally, I use it only in clients workplaces [fixing their
installations], My OS of choice is usually BSD, Linux or other open
source operating system. I like to keep myself cool when it comes to
the tools I use. I also recommend it to you,
On 2 October 2011 08:03, LeviaComm Networks n...@leviacomm.net wrote:
First off, the UEFI boot will *not* prevent other OS's from booting, it
will
only pop up a message saying that the boot process was not secure, just
like
how you can run unsigned code and it will only pop up a box stating as
Yeah, honestly Microsoft has even said already, there will be no nagging the
only feature you lose by not using secured booting is the swift boot. if you
flip
secured UEFI off it just makes windows 8 go into standard boot. fear
mongering
is not needed, and in the end if a secured boot loader is
http://www.trollaxor.com/2011/10/why-i-uninstalled-openbsd.html
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Lionel Hutchence
lionel.hutche...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.trollaxor.com/2011/10/why-i-uninstalled-openbsd.html
I _almost_ thought he wasn't trolling (despite the domain name) until
I saw his others posts about OpenBSD. Then it was just too obvious.
why are you trolling?
any idiot who can rub two neurons can think of the following points:
1) formal audit cost $$
2) this is a free project, always not enough $$
3) anyone who can write code can audit it for themselves
4) the stupid troll's point that other project uses openbsd's code -
that
I'm running 4.9 release with 2x usb hard drives in a softraid raid1 setup.
Both drives lost power so both volumes are degraded:
softraid0: trying to bring up sd3 degraded
softraid0: sd3 offline, will not be brought online
running the following doesn't fix the problem, I just get the
Absolute rubbish! You want to uninstall OpenBSD, go ahead, it's your risk and
loss.
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Saturday,
October 1, 2011 5:49 PM
Subject: Why I uninstalled OpenBSDb
http://www.trollaxor.com/2011/10/why-i-uninstalled-openbsd.html
Not again people, please.
Stop feeding.
On 10/01/11 23:08, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
Not again people, please.
Stop feeding.
Yes.
Yet another never-heard-from-before-or-again loser (and *always* using a
gmail account...isn't that interesting?) posting a link to that loser's
site (which is hosted on google, and MX records point
I recently installed 4.9 on a Dell Inspiron 1720 laptop, which has the
Broadcom 440x NIC on board.
Has anyone had luck getting the NIC working? It wasn't detected during the
setup.
Today's post: I uninstalled OpenBSD the other day after using it since
version 4.0 came out five years ago.
Another post, dated 06/03/2010: I was a long-time OpenBSD user since
the 3.1 days, and cut my teeth on Unix development there.
Of course, this guy lost all credibility here long before
The bce(4) driver has been re-enabled recently after
being overhauled to deal with hardware limitations.
Wait for 5.0 or try a snapshot.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:58:07PM +1100, Gavin Norman wrote:
I recently installed 4.9 on a Dell Inspiron 1720 laptop, which has the
Broadcom 440x NIC on
22 matches
Mail list logo
