Hi list,
I do a backup of a remote system by running rsync over ssh. The backup is
stored as tgz. Both systems running OBSD 5.0. For convinience I rsync the
whole system to keep the backup script very simple in crontab. The remote
system uses about 17.8G.
Once in a while the remote systems hangs
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD guest VM, which needs to be configured before it
boots up. I can access the OS through the VMWare APIs', but then need
to configure the /etc/hostname.* file to update the IP address. One
way I can think of is to lookup fsck code, and figure this out (or I
may be wrong). If
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:40:22PM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD guest VM, which needs to be configured before it
boots up. I can access the OS through the VMWare APIs', but then need
to configure the /etc/hostname.* file to update the IP address. One
way I can think
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 06:50:39AM -0400, Jiri B wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:40:22PM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD guest VM, which needs to be configured before it
boots up. I can access the OS through the VMWare APIs', but then need
to configure the
Para visualizar correctamente este newsletter ingresa a
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.b.29hh.4a.xb5yp3cb19
I've just finished setting up two virtual machines with OB 5.1 current
snapshot.
When I enable pfsync I get the following:
carp: pfsync0 demoted group carp by 1 to 1 (pfsync bulk start)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group pfsync by 1 to 1 (pfsync bulk start)
carp: pfsync0 demoted group carp by -1 to 0
The manpage for makemap(8) mentions some usefull options that I would
like to use, but the actual makemap binary says e.g.
~$ /usr/sbin/makemap -d /tmp/map
makemap: unknown option -- d
usage: makemap [-o dbfile] [-t type] file
On this system, I replaced sendmail with smtpd. It seems I am
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:58:42PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
The manpage for makemap(8) mentions some usefull options that I would
like to use, but the actual makemap binary says e.g.
~$ /usr/sbin/makemap -d /tmp/map
makemap: unknown option -- d
usage: makemap [-o dbfile] [-t type] file
Du har 1 ny melding ! Vennligst fornye Sparebank 1 konto.
Din SpareBank 1 konto er lest.
E logge inn, vennligst klikk pe linken nedenfor:
http://www2.sparebank1.no/portal/1001/3_privat
| ) SpareBank 1 Gruppen AS. | Personvern, sikkerhet og vilker. |
On 2012-05-09, Amarendra Godbole amarendra.godb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD guest VM, which needs to be configured before it
boots up. I can access the OS through the VMWare APIs', but then need
to configure the /etc/hostname.* file to update the IP address. One
way I can think
On 2012-05-09, [BG-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
elmar.bscho...@bugconsulting.de wrote:
Hi list,
I do a backup of a remote system by running rsync over ssh. The backup is
stored as tgz. Both systems running OBSD 5.0. For convinience I rsync the
whole system to keep the backup script very simple
According these guys connect trough SSH to a remote server is not secure...
http://www.wziss.com/
Look in Case Studies
Cheers,
Alvaro
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
2012/5/9 Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez alv...@alvaromantilla.com:
According these guys connect trough SSH to a remote server is not secure...
It's only as secure as the local and/or remote machine.
There's nothing SSH can do about that.
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:20:44AM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
According these guys connect trough SSH to a remote server is not secure...
http://www.wziss.com/
Look in Case Studies
Cheers,
Alvaro
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
Exactly! LOL
El 09/05/2012, a las 09:53, S. Scott escribis:
On May 9, 2012, at 11:25, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez
alv...@alvaromantilla.com wrote:
According these guys connect trough SSH to a remote server is not
secure...
http://www.wziss.com/
Look in Case Studies
Cheers,
Alvaro
Caro usuario da conta (misc@openbsd.org),
Estamos atualizando nosso banco de dados e e-mail centro conta. Estamos a
excluir todas as contas de Webmail nco utilizados e criar mais espago para
novas contas. Para garantir que vocj nco experimenta interrupgco do servigo
durante este permodo, por
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 11:53 -0400, S. Scott wrote:
Good luck with your malicious administrator and the other 999,999
things you really need to be concerned about.
It's more of the DAC silliness: you're not secure because you trust
your systems administrator; I don't have to do that... (I
On 2012-05-09, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez alv...@alvaromantilla.com wrote:
According these guys connect trough SSH to a remote server is not secure...
http://www.wziss.com/
And if you're connecting to a compromised web server, HTTPS doesn't
automatically make that secure either. This is not the
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:42:09 +0200
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
It's only as secure as the local and/or remote machine.
There's nothing SSH can do about that
I have a bucket of water. Can anyone tell me why my hand gets wet if I
put it inside the bucket.
On 9 May 2012 13:18, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:42:09 +0200
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
It's only as secure as the local and/or remote machine.
There's nothing SSH can do about that
I have a bucket of water. Can anyone tell me why my hand gets wet if I
It's only as secure as the local and/or remote machine.
There's nothing SSH can do about that
I have a bucket of water. Can anyone tell me why my hand gets wet if I
put it inside the bucket.
That's because you need to buy AutoBucket.
And only AutoBucket can protect you against
On 9 May 2012 14:59, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
It's only as secure as the local and/or remote machine.
There's nothing SSH can do about that
I have a bucket of water. Can anyone tell me why my hand gets wet if I
put it inside the bucket.
That's because you need to buy
On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:35:42 -0300
Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
That's because you need to buy AutoBucket.
Having spent some time recently on some linux mailing lists.
I have to say this lists fuckin A.
I think Alvaro should read the classic paper: Reflections on Trusting Trust.
Alvaro,
Written by one of the guys who wrote UNIX and the original C compiler,
which is what almost every UNIX based system is derived from...
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html
--
Resurrecting an old topic...
On 2011-10-27 16:05, Stefan Rinkes wrote:
I'm currently using a current kernel with following patch:
--- sys/netinet6/in6.c 8 Aug 2011 13:04:35 - 1.93
+++ sys/netinet6/in6.c 27 Oct 2011 19:59:00 -
@@ -2476,6 +2476,14 @@ in6if_do_dad(struct ifnet *ifp)
* NS
Thanks for pointing that article out. I read that paper sometime ago.
My intention with this thread was exactly this: get a lot of comments and put
some smiles in people4s faces.
I received this trough linkedin from some experts group or something like that
(yeap...no comments).
Is interesting
Hi everybody,
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and when I install
it (amd64 flavour), I see that fw_update automatically installs propietary
firmware without my permission. Actually even worse, it updates it
automatically from the net!
The parts affected are quite
On 05/09/12 21:33, mark sullivan wrote:
Hi everybody,
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and when I install
it (amd64 flavour), I see that fw_update automatically installs propietary
firmware without my permission. Actually even worse, it updates it
automatically
For me as well. Maybe someone needs to read more careful and just don't
push enter all the way.
// Johan
On May 9, 2012 10:02 PM, Tobias Sarnowski tob...@trustedco.de wrote:
On 05/09/12 21:33, mark sullivan wrote:
Hi everybody,
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 21:33, mark sullivan wrote:
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and when I
install it (amd64 flavour), I see that fw_update automatically installs
propietary firmware without my permission. Actually even worse, it updates
it automatically from the
Il giorno 09/mag/2012 21:38, mark sullivan mark.sulli...@gmx.fr ha
scritto:
Hi everybody,
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and when I
install it (amd64 flavour), I see that fw_update automatically installs
propietary firmware without my permission. Actually even
On 05/09/12 22:55, Johan Ryberg wrote:
For me as well. Maybe someone needs to read more careful and just don't
push enter all the way.
While that's a natural thought nowadays, it's not the case here;
$ cvs log -r1.654 install.sub
/.../
OPENBSD_5_1: 1.655.0.2
OPENBSD_5_1_BASE:
On 2012-05-09, mark sullivan mark.sulli...@gmx.fr wrote:
I would like to hear your arguments on this and if there is a
simple way to disable fw_update and uninstall in general everything
propietary affecting the network card that I have not been warned
about.
In the cases of the firmware
I would like to hear your arguments on this and if there is a simple way to
disable fw_update and uninstall in general everything propietary
affecting the network card that I have not been warned about.
If you're using a PC you should probably also be aware that
there is likely to be
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:34, Brett wrote:
You can use pf to block those network devices that have firmware you don't
trust
Way too late at that point. It's already copied your top zecret data to the
NSA.
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:55:07 +
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:34, Brett wrote:
You can use pf to block those network devices that have firmware you don't
trust
Way too late at that point. It's already copied your top zecret data to the
NSA.
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 21:33 +0200, mark sullivan wrote:
Hi everybody,
I was coming to OpenBSD 5.1 looking for reasonable privacy and when I
install it (amd64 flavour), I see that fw_update automatically installs
propietary firmware without my permission. Actually even worse, it updates it
Dear All,
I am resurrecting this thread which I followed carefully because I need
some hardware advice for the firewall machine which is going to serve
our new scientific computing laboratory. Initially behind this firewall,
we will have only two small (16 and 8 nodes) clusters, a GPU based super
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 23:39 +0200, David Coppa wrote:
What's the purpose of having a non-working wifi card?
If you have concerns with firmwares, swap your card with, for example, an
atheros or another card that doesn't need a firmware.
And, btw, the other firmware is for a webcam
firewall dual homed
network facing static nic address = 5.5.5.4 (rfc1918/rfc6598)
virgin media router facing static nic address = 3.3.3.2
(rfc1918/rfc6598)
virgin media router static address = 3.3.3.3 (rfc1918/rfc6598)
virgin media dynamic wan address = 1.1.1.1 (internet-routable)
Ah, ok.
Sorry Mark. I didn't know that.
Johan
On May 10, 2012 12:46 AM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 05/09/12 22:55, Johan Ryberg wrote:
For me as well. Maybe someone needs to read more careful and just don't
push enter all the way.
While that's a natural thought
41 matches
Mail list logo
