On Mon, May 21, 2012, at 06:43 PM, Richards, Toby wrote:
> While my question involves other BSD's as well as Linux systems, I am
>
> Respectfully Submitted,
Why do trolls always sign off this way? :)
Or they open with,"I don't want to start a fight, but...".
2012/5/22 Richards, Toby :
> Outstanding point. The thing is this: With MS
> PHP is clearly distinct from the OS. I go get it
> from php.org. With BSD I must rely on the
> package system.
Or you download it and compile it yourself, so the word "must" up
there is clearly false unless you have someo
I already read your posts ;-) and also man pages (ikectl, iked.conf and
iked)
But now it is for a road warrior configuration.
I don't understand these parts :
Parts that i don't understand, if someone can help me on :
-For server, i need a certificate server for vpn.X.net ? or aa.bb.cc.dd
?
i
Have a look at the discussion between me and Mike Belopuhov that took
place not so long ago here... We have covered most of the troubles that
you might have met following the man pages.
22.05.2012 10:14, Wesley P=P0P?P8QP0P;:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to have this
> 192.168.0.0/24--lan--5.1GW--egress-
Hi,
I'm trying to have this
192.168.0.0/24--lan--5.1GW--egress--INTERNET--win7rw
working.
Gw : (OpenBSD 5.1) hostname vpn.X.net
lan have 192.168.0.51/24
egress have a static ip address : aa.bb.cc.dd
lan, egress are groups to easily manage PF.
win7rw : Host Windows7 Road
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Richards, Toby
wrote:
> While my question involves other BSD's as well as Linux systems, I am
> asking this here because OpenBSD's philosophy is the most attractive
> to me.
>
> I've got about 50 servers to manage. OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
> option, but does it
Quoting "Richards, Toby" :
> Okay, let's compare upgrading OpenBSD 4.9 + Nginx + PHP 5.2.x to
> OpenBSD 5.0 + Nginx + PHP 5.3.x vice upgrading
> Windows 2003 + IIS 6 + ASPDotNet 3.5 to Windows 2008 +
> IIS 7.0 + ASPDotNet 4.0.
Errmm, apples and oranges comparison here.
Everything on your Microso
On 5/21/12 9:34 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
On 21.05.2012 22:45, Richards, Toby wrote:
Granted: I do hold an MCSE certification, but I don't need it.
The upgrade just works. Well... despite occasional BSOD's ;)
I admit this kind of made me chuckle:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/toby-richards/37/7
> Outstanding point. The thing is this: With MS
> PHP is clearly distinct from the OS. I go get it
> from php.org. With BSD I must rely on the
> package system.
That is balony.
On OpenBSD, you get PHP yourself, too.
PHP is not part of OpenBSD.
The package tree is a convenience. If you expect u
On 21.05.2012 22:45, Richards, Toby wrote:
Okay, let's compare upgrading OpenBSD 4.9 + Nginx + PHP 5.2.x to
OpenBSD 5.0 + Nginx + PHP 5.3.x vice upgrading
Windows 2003 + IIS 6 + ASPDotNet 3.5 to Windows 2008 +
IIS 7.0 + ASPDotNet 4.0.
In my experience, the MicroEvil Upgrade works without breakin
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
tintercelular.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
tbiodinamica.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
naferramiento.jpg]
>Outstanding point. The thing is this: With MS
>PHP is clearly distinct from the OS. I go get it
>from php.org. With BSD I must rely on the
>package system.
This is taking up a lot of ink; is this a genuine enquiry or a provocation?
Search for "Extraneous entries for Visual C++ Standard hotfixes"
Outstanding point. The thing is this: With MS
PHP is clearly distinct from the OS. I go get it
from php.org. With BSD I must rely on the
package system.
Respectfully Submitted,
R. Toby Richards
Network Administrator
Superior Court of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
(805) 781-4
Okay, let's compare upgrading OpenBSD 4.9 + Nginx + PHP 5.2.x to
OpenBSD 5.0 + Nginx + PHP 5.3.x vice upgrading
Windows 2003 + IIS 6 + ASPDotNet 3.5 to Windows 2008 +
IIS 7.0 + ASPDotNet 4.0.
In my experience, the MicroEvil Upgrade works without breaking
any of my web apps. The OpenBSD upgrade get
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 19:20, Richards, Toby wrote:
> Will pkg_add -ui upgrade between major releases, such as php 5.2.x => 5.3.x?
> When I upgraded OpenBSD 4.9 => 5.0, there was a huge issue because
> it supported both PHP 5.2.x AND 5.3.x. I'd have loved to seamlessly
> upgraded to 5.3.x, but the
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:43:19PM -0700, Richards, Toby wrote:
> While my question involves other BSD's as well as Linux systems, I am
> asking this here because OpenBSD's philosophy is the most attractive
> to me.
>
> I've got about 50 servers to manage. OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
> option, bu
Dump/restore can work remarkably like Symantek/Norton Ghost in this
situation. Get one machine as flawless as possible, then do a dump onto a
spare hard drive. Burn it to a DVD if you like. Then restore onto your
target machines.
You may have to fiddle with installboot to make the clones bo
Quoting "Richards, Toby" :
> Will pkg_add -ui upgrade between major releases, such as php 5.2.x =>
> 5.3.x?
> When I upgraded OpenBSD 4.9 => 5.0, there was a huge issue because
> it supported both PHP 5.2.x AND 5.3.x. I'd have loved to seamlessly
> upgraded to 5.3.x, but the support of both made i
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:43:19PM -0700, Richards, Toby wrote:
> The two major commercial operating systems (considered to be evil by
> the FOSS community) easily upgrade from one version to the next. That's
> important in a real-life production environment. In 2001, I upgraded
> 200 workstations
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Richards, Toby
> > wrote:
> >> OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
> >> option, but does it upgrade the installed packages?
> >
> > pkg_add -ui
>
> Even more relevant: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade51.html
>
> Interestingly, when I upgrade a Windows machine, the
On May 21, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Mike Erdely wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Richards, Toby
> wrote:
>> OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
>> option, but does it upgrade the installed packages?
>
> pkg_add -ui
Even more relevant: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade51.html
Interestingly, when I
Will pkg_add -ui upgrade between major releases, such as php 5.2.x => 5.3.x?
When I upgraded OpenBSD 4.9 => 5.0, there was a huge issue because
it supported both PHP 5.2.x AND 5.3.x. I'd have loved to seamlessly
upgraded to 5.3.x, but the support of both made it nearly
impossible.
Respectfully Su
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Rafael Zalamena
wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:19:58PM -0300, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
>>> While I was configuring a new ALIX to my MPLS setup a panic ocurred
>>> while starting LDPd daemon.
>>>
>>> Step
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:19:58PM -0300, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
>> While I was configuring a new ALIX to my MPLS setup a panic ocurred
>> while starting LDPd daemon.
>>
>> Steps:
>> 1. Configure all interfaces using /etc/hostname.*, then run
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Richards, Toby
wrote:
> OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
> option, but does it upgrade the installed packages?
pkg_add -ui
In freebsd you could use portupgrade or portmaster; I dont know what the
openbsd options are.
On May 21, 2012 6:48 PM, "Richards, Toby"
wrote:
> While my question involves other BSD's as well as Linux systems, I am
> asking this here because OpenBSD's philosophy is the most attractive
> to me.
>
Newsletter #16
Don't want to receive this e-mail ? Send your adress with the word
"Delete" and your e-mail adress to newslett...@fabfaya.com
http://www.fabfaya.com
i...@fabfaya.com
Fab Faya Official website
Don't want to receive this e-mail ?
Send your adress with the word "Delete"
While my question involves other BSD's as well as Linux systems, I am
asking this here because OpenBSD's philosophy is the most attractive
to me.
I've got about 50 servers to manage. OpenBSD does have an Upgrade
option, but does it upgrade the installed packages? As far as I can
tell, it does not.
> FWIW, I have 20M/5M VDSL service at home and have zero issue doing
> 20Mbps with OpenBSD as my pppoe-based firewall. That said, while I
> wouldn't expect a 300MHz machine to limit you to 2.4Mbps, it is a bit
> weak--and rl NICs are some of the worst out there. Curiously, when
> doing 2.4Mbps, w
Hi,
I am trying to set up a Layer 3 MPLS VPN (RFC 4364) with GRE tunnels
between PEs (RFC 4797) instead of an MPLS backbone. I have followed the
instructions in the "Demystifying MPLS" paper (
http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/papers/jeker/MPLS.pdf), and on the following
mailing list posts:
http://old.na
De nuestra mayor consideracion: Les hacemos llegar este email para
presentarles a A.R.Pueyo & Asociados, empresa argentina de soluciones en
informatica con 30 aqos de experiencia en el mercado. A.R.Pueyo & Asociados
brinda servicios de:
Asesoramiento Tecnico y Consultoria en Sistemas.
Consultoria
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:30:49PM -0400, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> My site needs both split horizon and pretty complete authoritative support.
> Does anyone have suggestions about BIND replacement(s) for this scenario?
> Right now BIND works for me (for some value of "works".)
>
> One machine servin
Alan Corey wrote:
> Can adjfreq() adjust the frequency of the real time clock that runs when
> the computer is turned off or is it just the clock within the operating
> system?
The latter.
> I just ported chu by William Rossi and I'm wondering if adjfreq might be a
> workaround for not havin
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:19:58PM -0300, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
> While I was configuring a new ALIX to my MPLS setup a panic ocurred
> while starting LDPd daemon.
>
> Steps:
> 1. Configure all interfaces using /etc/hostname.*, then run 'sh
> /etc/netstart'
> 2. Configure ospfd.conf, then start i
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> My site needs both split horizon and pretty complete authoritative support.
> Does anyone have suggestions about BIND replacement(s) for this scenario?
NSD for authoritative and Unbound (both from NLnet Labs of Amsterdam)
for caching resolve
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0200, Hendrik Meyburgh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem where the default install of 5.1 does not import routes into
> the rdomain solely based on the community but it uses the route
> distinguisher.
>
> This causes the below scenario:
>
> in bgpd.conf
> rdom
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:19:11AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've recently setup up a series of 6 OpenBSD boxes all running 5.1/amd64
> and connected together via an HP switch. The all run ospfd and bgpd.
> They each connect out to different external networks and most speak BGP
>
On 05/20/2012 10:49 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
On 05/20/12 17:49, David Diggles wrote:
Ok, I am interested in opinions on why one should migrate from BIND to unbound?
1) It is unlikely there will be any more updates to BIND9 in OpenBSD
base install.
2) It is even more unlikely that the comedyfest
Can adjfreq() adjust the frequency of the real time clock that runs when
the computer is turned off or is it just the clock within the operating
system?
I just ported chu by William Rossi and I'm wondering if adjfreq might be a
workaround for not having Linux's Timex. I've only had it running
Running -current (updated 5/19/12) and saw these entries today:
=
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new addresses into table fxp1:0: 12
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new addresses into table fxp1:network: 12
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new addres
Now I'm all upgraded to 5.1 I'm very happy with it all, other than a few
minor issues,
most notably:
I am still getting 300 kilobytes/second download speed with OpenBSD pppoe,
however when
I plug directly into a Mac and run pppoe on it, 3 megabytes/second.
What should I look at for tuning t
23:18:39
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of
=?utf-8?B?56eR5oqA5Yib5paw5LiO6aG555uu55Sz5oql5om25oyB5pS/562WLS0oNuaciDE05pel5p2t5beeKS5kb2M=?=]
Hi,
I have a problem where the default install of 5.1 does not import routes into
the rdomain solely based on the community but it uses the route
distinguisher.
This causes the below scenario:
in bgpd.conf
rdomain 2 {
descr "Testing"
rd 65001:238
import-target rt 65001:23
!Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de Mixico
Empresa Lmder en Capacitacisn y Actualizacisn de Capital Humano
Ponemos a su disposicisn este excelente curso denominado:
Mercadotecnia Moder
Hi All,
I've recently setup up a series of 6 OpenBSD boxes all running 5.1/amd64
and connected together via an HP switch. The all run ospfd and bgpd.
They each connect out to different external networks and most speak BGP
to external peers.
I keep seeing bgpd just quitting of its own accord.
Sqoexmne opndbhfemhe B`xecn dek` m`opls~ g`bhqhr nr pejk`l{. B bej
vhtpnb{u reumnknchi q`lni onoskpmni nak`qr|~ dk p`gleyemh pejk`l{, lnfmn
qwhr`r| menazrm{e opnqrnp{ qerh Hmrepmer. Nrkhwm` bnglnfmnqr| sbekhwhr| qbn~
vekebs~ `sdhrnph~ h ophbkew| mnb{u jkhemrnb p`gleqrhb b qerh qbni q`ir.
Op
On 2012-05-20, Ralph Ellis wrote:
> Clamav is the most easily available antimalware for OpenBSD. I would
> also take a look at F-Prot for OpenBSD workstations or servers.
>
> http://www.f-prot.com/download/corporate/
>
> I have read some reviews that F-Prot has a higher identification rate
> fo
On 2012-05-20, Norman Golisz wrote:
> On Sun May 20 2012 12:08, bofh wrote:
>> Ooo! If you have time, for the great unwashed masses, if you could
>> tell us what are the things we need to do in 5.1 to get this going,
>> that'd be greatly appreciated.
>
> # pkg_add -vi unbound
Agreed, for 5.1 you
48 matches
Mail list logo
