Probably you are looking a man page that doesn't match what you are
running, this was removed in favour of just having separate
prefix/prefix2 options a while ago.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:20:35AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to digest tmux's man page's statement, that it is
Remi Locherer remi.locherer () relo ! ch
The MSS field from your syn packages tells the other side what max package
size you accept. I found this white paper helpful to understand MTU,
PMTUD and MSS:
You are apparently correct.
This doesn't help:
match in all scrub (no-df)
This does help:
Daniel Melameth daniel () melameth ! com
What have you tried?
MSS probably incorrectly.
I had a 4.9 install I think with a lot of rules but I've started from
scratch with 5.1 over the weekend and I think I've got it now.
TCP negotiates MSS so a TCP session will never have an MSS higher than
On h, aug 06, 2012 at 08:38:47 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Probably you are looking a man page that doesn't match what you are
running, this was removed in favour of just having separate
prefix/prefix2 options a while ago.
Exactly, thanks. Sorry for the noise.
Daniel
--
LÉVAI Dániel
PGP
On 2012-08-05, Ben Calvert flying_wal...@me.com wrote:
you must read really fast!
I prefer to set mine to 300 so I don't need to pipe things to more :)
Seriously though, what are you trying to achieve with this setting?
just because the text will scroll faster doesn't mean the machine
On 2012-08-06, David Walker davidianwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly this is the exact setup that ran with the previous ISP
so presumably they handled all that within their network and passed on
packets somewhat smaller than 1500 to me. I never had to reassemble
packets or scrub them or
Hello!
I noted that the manpage of dc(1) reports a detail which is inconsistent
with the actual behaviour. Right at the beginning, it states the
following: 'If an argument is given, input is taken from that file until
its end, then from the standard input.'
In fact though, when started with an
Well, I have an actual list of advantages that git may offer:
- better patch/diff handling capabilities. CVS is very crappy at that.
As soon as you are testing stuff locally, every update request will produce
conflicts. git has very good merging capabilities, comparatively.
- possibility to
I would like to change /etc/ttys to get, for instance:
ttyC3 /usr/libexec/getty std.192600 vt220 on secure
instead of :
ttyC3 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 vt220 on secure
Do you think i could run into problems ?
As long as you are using a baud rate recognized by getty,
I'm running hotplugd on 5.2-current snapshot build from Aug 1. As I was
configuring it, I found that I could not terminate a running hotplugd and
then start it, nor could I restart it from
/etc/rc.d/hotplugd restart.
Looking at the source, it seems that hotplugd is expecting SIGQUIT in
order to
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:22:27PM +0200, Tom Knienieder wrote:
Some people might find this interesting.
CDE source is available here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/files/
...and the most interesting info is...
3) What license is it released under?
The source code to the
Hi,
I'm hit by a rather nasty OpenBGPd 'bug' causing sessions to flap
(basically go down/up/...).
One of the prefixes is: 81.169.0.0/17
Description of bug
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-July/023774.html
Is the included fix
(((s 0xf0) ~(ATTR_EXTLEN | (m))) == (t))
On Aug 6, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Well, I have an actual list of advantages that git may offer:
Thanks, Marc. Good listing! I wonder what CVS brings to the table on the
bright side?
I understand everything that's been said. I've even come to hate GPL'ed
software
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:34:22PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
Hi,
I'm hit by a rather nasty OpenBGPd 'bug' causing sessions to flap
(basically go down/up/...).
One of the prefixes is: 81.169.0.0/17
Description of bug
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-July/023774.html
Does anyone know what the current state of softraid 5 is?
The man page says rebuild and scrub are not supported.
The last checkin was about 6 months ago.
Any information would be appreciated.
I've got 3 or 4 terabytes that need a reliable home.
And yes, RAID is no substitute for backups.
One
On 08/06/12 17:22, Geoff Steckel wrote:
Does anyone know what the current state of softraid 5 is?
The man page says rebuild and scrub are not supported.
The last checkin was about 6 months ago.
sounds like your question is answered.
Scrub and rebuild are critical for RAID5, if that wasn't
16 matches
Mail list logo
