On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:03:01PM +1000, Brett Mahar wrote:
Hi misc,
I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
This time I remember to:
ok?
yes, ok ;)
jmc
Brett.
Index: src/share/man/man3/intro.3
===
RCS
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:18:43PM +, Heptas Torres wrote:
I am trying to generate a starting xorg.conf file by running X
-configure but get a segmentation fault error (output below). Any
ideas what could go wrong? Have tried this both in a VMware guest and
on real hardware but I get the
* Andy a...@brandwatch.com [2013-09-02 15:55]:
Also I'm very willing to beta test the new ALTQ code? I was chatting
to Theo briefly a few weeks back and he said I should ask for the
code but I cannot remember who in the team he said I should message
for this?
c'est moi.
diff at
Hi,
[intro]This question was originally asked on StackOverflow, but so far
I have not get a response.[/intro]
In Linux, 'clone()' syscall is used for creating processes/threads.
On OpenBSD using ktrace/kdump I determined that for process creation
'vfork()' syscall is used, and for thread
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Andy a...@brandwatch.com [2013-09-02 15:55]:
Also I'm very willing to beta test the new ALTQ code? I was chatting
to Theo briefly a few weeks back and he said I should ask for the
code but I cannot remember who
If you queue your http traffic, downloading those pics are not that bad on
the links. ;)
2013/9/13 noah pugsley noah.pugs...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Andy a...@brandwatch.com [2013-09-02 15:55]:
Also I'm very willing to
* noah pugsley noah.pugs...@gmail.com [2013-09-13 09:12]:
Gosh darn you Henning and your gigantic bavarian slides! Gosh darn you to
heck.
I'm not barb... erm, bavarian.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting,
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:10, niXman wrote:
On OpenBSD using ktrace/kdump I determined that for process creation
'vfork()' syscall is used, and for thread creation - 'tfork()'.
I have two questions:
1. Is my statement correct?
somewhat. fork() would be the syscall more likely to create a
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 11:10 +0400, niXman wrote:
Hi,
[intro]This question was originally asked on StackOverflow, but so far
I have not get a response.[/intro]
In Linux, 'clone()' syscall is used for creating processes/threads.
On OpenBSD using ktrace/kdump I determined that for process
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:17:56PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
Thanks for the good tips!
I think the bootparams swap file information will be used correctly (I
remember seeing a fix in this area some time ago). It doesn't hurt
anyway to mention it
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:43:21 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:59:08 -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
I've noticed that the sudo on OpenBSD seems to have !ttytickets set by
default. In other words, I authenticate sudo once on, say, ttyp4, and
all of my login sessions on
On 09/13/13 06:44, Donovan Watteau wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:43:21 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:59:08 -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
I've noticed that the sudo on OpenBSD seems to have !ttytickets set by
default. In other words, I authenticate sudo once on,
On 09/13/13, Nick Holland wrote:
On 09/13/13 06:44, Donovan Watteau wrote:
Hi,
Am I right thinking that sudo in base is still vulnerable to
CVE-2013-1776 for those who enable tty_tickets?
BTW, I was thinking about the following use case: PermitRootLogin set
to no, and a simple
Hi,
Could someone help me debug this following program on OBSD?
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include arpa/inet.h
#include arpa/nameser.h
#include resolv.h
main() {
int i;
res_init();
printf(Number of NS in resolv.conf is %d\n,
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:01:45PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
Could someone help me debug this following program on OBSD?
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include arpa/inet.h
#include arpa/nameser.h
#include resolv.h
main() {
int
I am curious - given that OpenBSD ships each RELEASE with X , but
applications like Firefox will not work without installing another DE, like
XFCE; why not ship OpenBSD with the basic X, but with the necessary
libraries to allow FireFox to run and other applications like R to output
graphics?
On 13/09/13 16:34, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Groping into _res is not a wise thing. The OpenBSD async resolver only
has minimal support for that.
ASR_DEBUG=1 ./a.out
Will probably get you the debug info you want.
-Otto
Thanks for the reply. As I said this is for debugging a legacy
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:30:50PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 13/09/13 16:34, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Groping into _res is not a wise thing. The OpenBSD async resolver only
has minimal support for that.
ASR_DEBUG=1 ./a.out
Will probably get you the debug info you want.
On 13/09/13 17:36, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
the program uses the following:
sendto(resfd, msg, len, 0, (struct sockaddr *)
(_res.nsaddr_list[i]), sizeof(struct sockaddr))
instead of sending requests to 192.168.0.1 it sends them to
127.0.0.1 (from tcpdump)
any
In general I really like and appreciate all that is done by developers with
OpenBSD. The OS is stable and it works well, and shipping it with X
already functional is a big help, especially on older boxes. Because to
compile xorg with this old sparc box under FreeBSD was taking 24 hours
and it
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:57:41PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 13/09/13 17:36, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
the program uses the following:
sendto(resfd, msg, len, 0, (struct sockaddr *)
(_res.nsaddr_list[i]), sizeof(struct sockaddr))
instead of
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:06:10AM -0400, Richard Thornton wrote:
I am curious - given that OpenBSD ships each RELEASE with X , but
applications like Firefox will not work without installing another DE,
[...]
That is not true. I ran Firefox and Chrome on a clean OpenBSD 4.9
installation when
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Brett Mahar
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
I'm not sure if it
On Friday, September 13, 2013 18:06 CEST, Jim MacKenzie j...@photojim.ca
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Brett Mahar
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: GCC 2.95 mention
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Jim MacKenzie j...@photojim.ca wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Brett Mahar
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:03 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
I
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of David Coppa
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:14 AM
To: Jim MacKenzie
Cc: misc
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
I think the GCC 2.95 line is no longer relevant.
I'm not
On 13/09/13 1:13 PM, Jim MacKenzie wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of David Coppa
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:14 AM
To: Jim MacKenzie
Cc: misc
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 mention in intro(3)
I think the GCC 2.95 line is
How much memory and disk does your SPARC have?
You might want to consider a lighter weight browser like midori or netsurf
- I've not bother powering up my old SPARC boxes for about five years - and
I always ran them headless, so my advice is a bit out of date ;~)
hth
Fred
On 13 Sep 2013 16:40,
Deal All,
I am trying to set up OpenVPN server at my work on the freshly installed
OpenBSD machine using a 5.4 snapshot from July 30 (i386) and the ports
tree fetched the same day. We must use OpenVPN so I am not interested
in alternatives.
After spending several hours I made no progress as I
I gave up on Firefox and Chrome on my low memory older laptops, found
midori, and using it everywhere now. It has exactly what I need and no
more.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Fred Crowson fred.crow...@gmail.comwrote:
How much memory and disk does your SPARC have?
You might want to
On 13.09.2013 14:14, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Deal All,
I am trying to set up OpenVPN server at my work on the freshly
installed
OpenBSD machine using a 5.4 snapshot from July 30 (i386) and the
ports
tree fetched the same day. We must use OpenVPN so I am not interested
in
31 matches
Mail list logo
