Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot
live without it.
NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well
Original message from Stuart Henderson at 26-9-2013 23:58
On 2013-09-26, Daniel Polak dan...@sys.nl wrote:
I'd like to see how isakmpd interprets the settings in ipsec.conf and
isakmpd.conf and would like to compare those interpretations.
ipsecctl -nvf /etc/ipsec.conf shows the settings
On 9/27/13 10:46 AM, Daniel Polak wrote:
What would have helped me solve this is a way to see what the current
configuration of isakmpd looks like (irrespective of whether it was
loaded from isakmpd.conf or from ipsec.conf).
It appears there is no equivalent of a C get all command to the FIFO
to
Fellow users,
do I understand correctly that RST replies to packets blocked with pf
cannot be arbitrarily routed?
pf.conf(5) says that (...) reply-to is useful only in rules that create
state. Since 'block' and 'match' rules seem to (understandably) not create
state entries, there is no apparent
Hi!
There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform
usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use
OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood the platform is
beagle, am I right?
--
chs,
Christer Solskogen christer.solskogen at gmail.com writes:
There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform
usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use
OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood the platform is
beagle, am I right?
Hey,
I have added support for the i.MX6 SoC to the tree. The platform is now called
armv7
instead of beagle. There might be some changes needed to support the Utilite,
too.
Apart from that it should be usable.
\Patrick
Am 27.09.2013 um 13:04 schrieb Christer Solskogen
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
There was a mention of this platform earlier, but is this platform
usable yet? I'm getting myself a Utilite, and was hoping I could use
OpenBSD in it. This is ARM, but as far as I understood the
hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-09-26 Thu 10:15 AM |, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
I use mutt basically because it has threading support, and I cannot
live without it.
NetBSD version of mailx does support threading as well
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Wildt m...@patrick-wildt.de wrote:
Hey,
I have added support for the i.MX6 SoC to the tree. The platform is now
called armv7
instead of beagle. There might be some changes needed to support the
Utilite, too.
Apart from that it should be usable.
Hello!
I was updating my amd64 laptop with September 24 snapshot's bsd.rd, and it
didn't let me select etc and xetc sets - they were simply missing in the list
of sets. Is it a glitch? Or may be I missed some news?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Thanks to Christer I have just placed an order for an Utilite, too. :)
Thank you very much!
\Patrick
Am 27.09.2013 um 21:54 schrieb Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Patrick Wildt m...@patrick-wildt.de wrote:
Hey,
I have added support for
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Patrick Wildt m...@patrick-wildt.de wrote:
Thanks to Christer I have just placed an order for an Utilite, too. :)
Thank you very much!
My pleasure. Now we just need to wait six weeks :)
--
chs,
On 09/27/13 21:44, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Hello!
I was updating my amd64 laptop with September 24 snapshot's bsd.rd, and it
didn't let me select etc and xetc sets - they were simply missing in the list
of sets. Is it a glitch? Or may be I missed some news?
Install allows the selection
14 matches
Mail list logo
