On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Jason Tubnor wrote:
On 2 June 2014 10:23, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
Part of the deprecation / migration process is identifying the weird
ways people use vnd and finding solutions for them. But as we've seen,
people never move forward without the occasional
Morning,
On 15/10/14 03:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-10-14, Federico Donati nix.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/14/2014 06:53 PM, Andy wrote:
Why do you have so many CARP interfaces?
Generally it's good practice to have one CARP interface per broadcast
domain / VLAN etc, and have all your
On 13/10/14 22:50, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:42:34PM +0100, Nux! wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with my OpenBSD cloud instance in that it completely ignores the
signals sent to it by qemu-kvm, so instead of getting shut down or rebooted gracefully it
has to be reset.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, at 10:24 AM, Carlin Bingham wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, at 09:05 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 14/10/14(Tue) 06:40, Carlin Bingham wrote:
I have booted the latest (11/10/14) snapshot install56.fs from a USB
drive and want to install it to an external USB drive but the
On 16/10/14(Thu) 00:07, Carlin Bingham wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, at 10:24 AM, Carlin Bingham wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, at 09:05 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 14/10/14(Tue) 06:40, Carlin Bingham wrote:
I have booted the latest (11/10/14) snapshot install56.fs from a USB
drive and
On 10/15/2014 04:18 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The most common cause I've seen for split carp states is a mismatch of
IP addresses between master/secondary, though I would think that a
combination of using defer and not using no-sync on the carp/pfsync
states could very well cause problems
ath started misbehaving really bad recently.
it works for a couple of minutes and then i have
to do ifconfig ath0 scan, and starts working again.
i know ath support is very picky, but this one
is an older one, and except a hiccup here and
there, i dont recall frustration on this scale.
any ideas?
On 2014-10-14 Tue 10:41 AM |, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Unfortunately host is maintained upstream, in the bind codebase,
by ISC.
You should file your bug report there, because that is the right way
to get change into the ecosystem.
Submitted, with their GITWEB line number refs.
ISC's bug
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:22:00PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
ath started misbehaving really bad recently.
it works for a couple of minutes and then i have
to do ifconfig ath0 scan, and starts working again.
Can you elaborate on what recently means?
Did it ever work properly, and if so,
Stefan Sperling, 15 Oct 2014 17:36:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:22:00PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
ath started misbehaving really bad recently.
it works for a couple of minutes and then i have
to do ifconfig ath0 scan, and starts working again.
Can you elaborate on what recently means?
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:02:23 +0100
Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Hi
Try setting the advskew to a number greater than 200 and less then
254. This seems to be the most stable.
For best practice our primary runs with carp and pfsync values of
'1'. And the backup runs with carp and pfsync
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
Oct 14 15:21:19 bgp1 /bsd: carp2: state transition: MASTER - BACKUP
Oct 14 15:21:19 bgp1 /bsd: carp1: state transition: MASTER - BACKUP
Oct 14 15:21:22 bgp1 /bsd: carp1: state transition: BACKUP - MASTER
Oct 14 15:21:22
On Oct 13, 2014 10:40 PM, Patrik Lundin patrik.lundin@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:39:04AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
armani@ has laid the groundwork for this and I recently started
contributing to his fork as well.
The work-in-progress can be found here:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:48:20AM -0700, xSAPPYx wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014 10:40 PM, Patrik Lundin patrik.lundin@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:39:04AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
armani@ has laid the groundwork for this and I recently started
contributing to his fork
On 15-10-2014 01:38, Justin Mayes wrote:
Thanks to both of you for the advice
Just to followup I ended up with the relayd 'routers' setup as described in
man page but with a script monitor rather than icmp. The monitor finds
gateway for interface in route table and pings it with -I interface
My DNS server is being used in a reflection attack. I can tell its a
reflection attack by the incoming ttl of the DNS packet and the ping ttl
as returned with ping. They differ, meaning it's spoofed from another site.
While the system it's on is FreeBSD and it's pf is outdated, I didn't
see an
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:11:30 +0300
Matti Karnaattu wrote:
Like removing that stupid web browser
idiom that where is addressbar and back/forward buttons.
The address bar is one of the only things you can trust when browsing a
web page to the point that some mal-sites or mal-ads actually try to
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Joerg Jung m...@umaxx.net wrote:
Am 15.10.2014 um 00:58 schrieb Vladislav Manchev v...@bin.bz:
I need to set up a few machines in the coming weeks and was wondering
what's the status of stacked softraid and especially RAID1C discipline -
i.e. CRYPTO on
Please excuse typos, sent from my phone
On 15 Oct 2014, at 19:13, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:02:23 +0100
Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Hi
Try setting the advskew to a number greater than 200 and less then
254. This seems to be the most stable.
On 15-10-2014 17:56, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
The address bar is one of the only things you can trust when browsing a
web page
Provided your dns isn't spoofed. And you're are not being targeted with
a mitm attack. And perhaps a few other things. But yeah, the address bar
can normally be trusted.
Please excuse typos, sent from my phone
On 15 Oct 2014, at 19:13, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:02:23 +0100
Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Hi
Try setting the advskew to a number greater than 200 and less then
254. This seems to be the most stable.
I'm not sure where this sort of thing is supposed to be reported but the
Project Goals link on libressl.org (http://libressl.org/goals.html) is
giving me a 404 error.
Sigh, its sad when a project with that much potential has no goals.
Hopefully its just a phase.
Daniel Dyla wrote:
I'm not sure where this sort of thing is supposed to be reported but the
Project Goals link on libressl.org (http://libressl.org/goals.html) is
giving me a 404 error.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:38:49 -0400
Ian Grant wrote:
No, the pre-shared keys are communicated over the VPN, as are the
keys which encrypt the VPN's own data as it appears in the actual TCP
packets which carry the
2014-10-16 2:22 GMT+02:00 Ian Grant ian.a.n.gr...@googlemail.com:
Perhaps I have missed something but if you have a ssh tunnel or
something then just put that in front of the service without increasing
Moved to misc.
Yes, you missed something: the point :-)
The idea is that the existence
Sigh, its sad when a project with that much potential has no goals.
Hopefully its just a phase.
Just a phase. New web pages are being written and commited now.
Don't be such a web hipster :)
26 matches
Mail list logo
