On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2014-10-14 14:02:52, Joel Rees wrote:
>> What're the recommended input methods for Japanese and Spanish?
>>
>
> [...]
> The only complaint I have is that for some applications, namely
> xombrero and xfe, they either do not accept Japanese
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
> credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
> for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
> with hexdump lik
On 10/17/14 22:38, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
>> credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
>> for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
>> with hexdump like so: ./memte
On Fri 17/10 17:39, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> As I read the man page for su it is the target's login shell that is
> invoked, and it need not always be /bin/sh - it can be changed.
>
> Therefore I suspect that you want "-s /bin/sh " between "su " and "root".
I'm confused:
just22@poseidon:[~]> s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
> We have released LibreSSL 2.1.1- which should be arriving in the
> LIbreSSL directory of an OpenBSD mirror near you very soon.
If I clone the GitHub repo from Bolivia, do I have to cut my eyeballs
out or stand guilty of re-exporting munitions fro
> I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
> credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
> for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
> with hexdump like so: ./memtest [pid] | hexdump -C | less
> Sometimes I g
I'm trying to read the stack of another process that has the same user
credentials. Here is my program, I am stuck with this, it doesn't work
for me. Printing 0's is rewrapped to '.' and you should use this program
with hexdump like so: ./memtest [pid] | hexdump -C | less
Sometimes I get a bit o
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:59:26PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> > Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
> > avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
> > don't show up on scans.
>
> That's why
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
> avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
> don't show up on scans.
That's why I want to hide it behind an ordinary service.
>> Also, the VPN could b
2014-10-17 20:49 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert :
> Well, if, as Herr Schroeder seems to be implying, this is used to
> avoid port scans, I'd look for traffic to/from address:port which
> don't show up on scans.
That's certainly possible but more expensive than "find all ssh servers".
Best
Martin
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:13:55PM -0400, Ian Grant wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
> >> 2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick :
> >> The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:51:08AM -0600, David Coppa wrote:
> > From: Thorsten Glaser
> > Date: Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: sudo bad practice or inconsistency?
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> >
> >
> > Alessandro DE LAURENZIS gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > (line-wrapped because of G
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Zé Loff wrote:
>
> > Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will
> be
> > using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
> > created by hand, fine).
> >
> > At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are there
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:45:41AM -0700, Kevin wrote:
> All,
>
> Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will be
> using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
> created by hand, fine).
>
> At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are there
All,
Installed 5.6-current last night and saw that the new httpd daemon will be
using the config file /etc/httpd.conf (which looks like it needs to be
created by hand, fine).
At the risk of sounding like a knucklehead, are there good examples of how
to hook php to the new daemon? (Or for that mat
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian Grant wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
>>> 2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick :
>>> The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
>>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
>> 2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick :
>> The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
>
> It's a good thing that traffic analysis isn't a thing,
Hallo,
"Undefined behavior is a concept known especially in the C and C++
languages which means that the semantics of certain operations is
undefined and the compiler presumes that such operations never happen.
For instance, using non-static variable before it has been initialized
is undefined. I
Hi folks,
The manpage for relayd.conf has this basic construct in it a couple of times :
table { 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.2.3 }
table disable { 10.1.5.1 retry 2 }
redirect "www" {
listen on www.example.com port 80
> From: Thorsten Glaser
> Date: Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: sudo bad practice or inconsistency?
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> Alessandro DE LAURENZIS gmail.com> writes:
>
> (line-wrapped because of GMane)
>
> > #define SUDOCMD "-fn 7x14 -geometry 60x4 -e sudo su -c 'nohup \
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
> 2014-10-17 10:24 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert :
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
> >> The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
> >
> > It's a good thing that traffic analysi
2014-10-17 10:24 GMT+02:00 Bret Lambert :
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
>> The impossibility to scan for services - which the NSA/GHCQ/... do.
>
> It's a good thing that traffic analysis isn't a thing, then. Otherwise
> they'd be able to check if traffic purpor
Alessandro DE LAURENZIS gmail.com> writes:
(line-wrapped because of GMane)
> #define SUDOCMD "-fn 7x14 -geometry 60x4 -e sudo su -c 'nohup \
> xfe >& /dev/null & sleep 1'"
^^
Note that this will not work on OpenBSD anyway; even mksh, which
does implement this bashism, will not parse this
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Martin Schr??der wrote:
> 2014-10-16 13:16 GMT+02:00 Kevin Chadwick :
> > I still don't see the benefit though but do see added complexity or
> > more code to audit.
> >
> > Reducing DDOS against a visible SSH service maybe? Reduce password
> > attempts on
24 matches
Mail list logo
