Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2014, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Maurice Janssen:
I suppose the comment in rc.conf should be: for normal use:
Just like most other services. Is that correct?
A look into rc.subr:
| eval _rcflags=\${${_name}_flags}
[..]
| [ -n ${_rcflags} ] daemon_flags=${_rcflags}
Seems
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades (previously
it was handled via sysmerge).
Is there a better mechanism to keep these, or should I just update
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades (previously
it was handled via
hello,
I use OpenBSD 5.5 as a firewall gateway.
I also use nfsen/nfdump as the netflow collector/analyzer.
pf.conf enables netflow for every pf rule (set state-defaults pflow).
When I analyse traffic using nfdump, some packets are missing. But on the
firewall, tcpdump shows there is traffic
Hi misc@,
after upgrading our pair of dhcpd servers to 5.6(-stable), i am seeing
strange DHCPACKs in our logs (in both of them):
Nov 7 09:28:34 dhcpd2 dhcpd[9269]: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.20.251
Nov 7 09:28:34 dhcpd2 dhcpd[9269]: DHCPACK on null address to
5c:51:4f:56:81:c3 via em0
Nov 7
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Rusty wrote:
On 11/05/14 20:04, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
I see errors trying to download some https URLs using python, but the
base ftp client isn't affected. 5.6 release and current. One example is
https://www.duosecurity.com/feed.
Hi all,
When I add an ip address to an interface in OpenBSD 5.6 it will create
two routes:
172.16/16 link#15UC 00 - 4
vether99
172.16.25.1fe:e1:ba:d1:50:44 UHLl 00 - 1
lo0
before it would only create:
172.16/16
As git is already there, it just makes sense.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:46:52AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades
Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
ftp.hostserver.de. As usual after rebooting I updated the sources from
the same server being set in '.profile' as CVSROOT.
This time I
On November 7, 2014 2:55:50 PM CET, Stefan Wollny stefan.wol...@web.de wrote:
Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
ftp.hostserver.de. As usual after rebooting I updated the sources
Hi,
A couple of typos in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
Section 4.5.2 - The Install Questions.
syspending = suspending
Section 4.5.4 - Choosing installation media and file sets.
...using + and - chars... - I think characters would be more
clear for a non-programmer.
Section 4.6.3 -
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, Dante F. B. Col?? wrote:
I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
public addresses
This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
attention.
OpenBSD 4.9 is long unsupported. There have been many
Am 11/07/14 um 15:15 schrieb Alexander Hall:
On November 7, 2014 2:55:50 PM CET, Stefan Wollny stefan.wol...@web.de
wrote:
Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
On 2014-11-06 Thu 17:35 PM |, Alexei Malinin wrote:
Where is your question, Craig?
These probably aren't the right words Alexei;-
When wscons(4) is used with various termcap types, bold blink work.
Could pccon do this too?
src/sys/dev/wscons/wsemul_vt100_subr.c has:
bold WSATTR_HILIT
That is not supported. You MUST NOT have IPs in the same range on
different interfaces.
You can assign some /32s (or /128 if you are using IPv6) to a lo1 on the
system, but that may not be what you want.
On 2014 Nov 06 (Thu) at 19:12:20 -0200 (-0200), Dante F. B. Col?? wrote:
:Hello everyone
Dear misc,
In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
Insight ?
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, at 04:25 AM, sven falempin wrote:
Dear misc,
In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
Insight ?
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
Hello All,
# uname -a
OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
This system should be -current as of last night.
I'm trying to build ports:
# cd /usr
# cvs -qd anon...@anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs get -rOPENBSD_`uname -r | sed
's/\./_/'` -P ports
Problem is that I got impatient and
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:46:52 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson
s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file
now appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades
(previously it was
Hi,
I downloaded -current as of November 6 @ 11:26 and installed it. I'm
doing a test run upgrading my system started to install required
packages.
At first, I thought the snapshot wasn't complete as I couldn't find the
mysql server. After a bit of head scratching, I went onto the cvsweb
Hi,
It is 1000 times faster (or some value... but wayyy faster) to just ftp
the ports.tar.gz file over when compared to using CVS.
Just saying...
Cheers,
Steve Williams
On 11/7/2014 8:47 AM, Jungle Boogie wrote:
Hello All,
# uname -a
OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
Dear Steve,
From: Steve Williams st...@williamsitconsulting.com
Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:11:51 -0700
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
Hi,
It is 1000 times faster (or some value... but wayyy faster) to just ftp
Hi,
I am reading through the FAQ again and just saw that in 8.14 lynx is
mentioned as still being in base:
Lynx, a text-based browser, is in the base system, and has SSL support.
Other browsers available include (in no particular order):
How could that happen? :-) We lost users over this!!
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file
now appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades
(previously it was handled via sysmerge).
Is there a better mechanism to keep these, or should I just update
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 17:43, Lars wrote:
Hi,
I am reading through the FAQ again and just saw that in 8.14 lynx is
mentioned as still being in base:
Yep. Updated to recommend ftp(1) now. :)
Jungle Boogie wrote on Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:20:36AM -0800:
Great idea! How do you update your ports, then?
Just download a new ports.tar.gz file
If you are running -stable, that doesn't help.
The file ports.tar.gz doesn't get updated for -stable after release.
or:
# cd /usr/ports
# cvs
On 2014-11-07, li...@ggp2.com li...@ggp2.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, Dante F. B. Col?? wrote:
I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
public addresses
This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
attention.
Yes,
On 2014-11-06, Jakub Skrzypnik jot.skr...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter, you can always found logs, even from ddb in
/var/log/messages{.[0-9].gz} (valid regexp?)
This might get saved at boot, but it depends on the machine, some clear the
dmesg buffer during startup. Since Peter says unfortunately my
On 2014-11-07, Jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
# uname -a
OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
This system should be -current as of last night.
I'm trying to build ports:
# cd /usr
# cvs -qd anon...@anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs get -rOPENBSD_`uname -r
Dear Ingo, Misc
From: Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de
Sent: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:08 +0100
To: Jungle Boogie Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
Jungle Boogie wrote on Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:20:36AM -0800:
Great
On 2014-11-07, li...@ggp2.com li...@ggp2.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, Dante F. B. Col?? wrote:
I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
public addresses
This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
attention.
Yes,
On 11/7/2014 1:37 PM, Jungle Boogie wrote:
Dear Ingo, Misc
From: Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de
Sent: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:08 +0100
To: Jungle Boogie Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
Jungle Boogie wrote on
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Carlin Bingham c...@viennan.net wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, at 04:25 AM, sven falempin wrote:
Dear misc,
In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
Insight ?
--
In the description of the -b option:
...
three elliptic curve sizes: 256, 384 or 521 bits.
Is 521 correct or is it supposed to be 512?
On 2014-11-07, System Administrator ad...@bitwise.net wrote:
In the description of the -b option:
...
three elliptic curve sizes: 256, 384 or 521 bits.
Is 521 correct
Yes. Those are ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 keys.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
In OpenBSD 5.6, the prototype and man-page for hosts.equiv(5) have
disappeared. However, this file is still referenced in sshd_config(5)
and (if I'm searching the sources correctly) in /usr/src/usr.bin/ssh
auth-rhosts.c which is included in the sshd/Makefile.
Is the removal accidental or an
36 matches
Mail list logo
