On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:44:08PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> Probably not, because if I remove all my .x* files
> and keep just the .Xdefaults -> .Xresources which
> specifies the UTF8 locale for xterm, the same thing
> happens in (the default) fvwm. Namely,
> the xterm started by default has XTERM
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:58:07PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Chris Cappuccio on Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:09:38 -0800:
>
> > aren't there plenty of simple pre-processor scripts that people are
> > using with lp to turn whatever into some output for simple dumb
> > printers? CUPS
Hi misc,
I am writing some code. My program will need detailed keyboard input,
like key press and key release.
I know I can get this setup with X (SDL too, which depends on X), but since I
don't necessarily need a GUI, it wouldn't be cool opening a window just to
get the keyboard.
I read on the
Thus said Chris Cappuccio on Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:09:38 -0800:
> aren't there plenty of simple pre-processor scripts that people are
> using with lp to turn whatever into some output for simple dumb
> printers? CUPS is so annoying and stupid, it's not even funny
Perhaps apsfilter?
Andy
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> I just created and will submit to ports a version
> of ghostscript which doesn't pull in cups - it
> turns out the configuration has a switch for that case.
>
aren't there plenty of simple pre-processor scripts that people
are using with lp to turn whatever into so
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 at 07:49 Jan Stary wrote:
> Why is that? Am I missing something obvious?
>
What happens if you launch terminals using the `uxterm` shell script?
Mark
Jan
On 02/18/2016 16:33, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:10:06PM -0500, gwes wrote:
.
They don't do dynamic autoconfiguration.
In an industrial environment autoconfiguration can be very bad.
(examples like directing confidential output somewhere unexpected)
I haven't looked at th
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:44:08 +0100 Jan Stary
> > My .Xdefaults is a symlink to .Xresources
> > and .xsession is a symlink to .xinitrc.
>
> Why is that? Am I missing something obvious?
$ grep xrdb .xinitrc
[[ -f ~/.Xresources ]] && xrdb -merge ~/.Xresources
[[ -f ~/.Xdefaults ]] && xrdb -merge ~/.Xde
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:10:06PM -0500, gwes wrote:
> I'm not sure what measure of "better" you're trying to apply.
>
> lpr et al. don't have a GUI. One could be wrapped around them.
>
I personally wouldn't want that. Others have said that cups provides
nice information for printers in other a
On 02/17/2016 12:49, Chris Bennett wrote:
After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is
significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of
consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike
laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high reliability.
Is anyone usi
On 02/17/2016 12:49, Chris Bennett wrote:
After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is
significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of
consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike
laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high reliability.
Is anyone usi
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. If you want to write a new
print job queueing system, sure, have fun. Maybe you can come up with a
'cups' that doesn't suck?
Well, let me say my opinion.
I think BSD and Unix is also "outdated beyond rescue", bu
> My .Xdefaults is a symlink to .Xresources
> and .xsession is a symlink to .xinitrc.
>
> But that's not it - my .xsession (-> .xinitrc) _is_ processed,
> because cwm is launched, as opposed to the default fvwm.
> And my .Xresources (= .Xdefaults) _is_ loaded, because
> the xterms I start from the
On Feb 16 19:50:57, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Feb 16 11:49:58, erling.westen...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:32:05AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:15:58AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > There seems to be a difference between an X session
> > > >
On Thu, 17 Feb 2016, Andy Bradford wrote:
Anyway, just some musings. Is there anyone else out there using
lpr/lpd/lprm from base? Maybe I'm the only one?
I never used something else.
And if I install a package that bloats my system with cups as dependency,
I delete immediatly the pac
I have an IPSec VPN endpoint running on OpenBSD on a cable
modem. Technically it has a dynamic IP but in practice the IP only changes
about once every 3 ~ 5 years. I run ddclient on the OpenBSD box to
maintain the dns name of the box so I can find it and that's working
well.
My ipsec configuration
On 2/17/16, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Anyway, just some musings. Is there anyone else out there using
> lpr/lpd/lprm from base? Maybe I'm the only one?
yep. been using it for many years with many different HP and Brother
network printers.
--patrick
Please take this offline.
On 2016 Feb 18 (Thu) at 06:26:21 +0200 (+0200), li...@wrant.com wrote:
:Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:12:58 -0500 Eric Furman
:> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 09:10 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
:> > Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman
:> > > Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lis
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman
> Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lists to spread the gospel of OpenBSD!
Better, influence highly skilled programmers, friends, colleagues,
partners, clients, the wide public, classmates, coeds, teachers, book
authors and everyone important of the truly
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:12:58 -0500 Eric Furman
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 09:10 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman
> > > Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lists to spread the gospel of OpenBSD!
> ^^^
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:15:50PM +, Mike Burns wrote:
> On 2016-02-18 17.11.03 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> > I appear to need to modify the default application used
> > by xdg-open to open a file directory. The man page of xdg-open
> > is not very helpful. Can anybody tell me what is the ri
Holger Glaess [gla...@glaessixs.de] wrote:
> > Holger Glaess [gla...@glaessixs.de] wrote:
> >> hi
> >>
> >> can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ?
> >>
> >> is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ?
> >
> > Yes although there may be more speed optimization possible
>
On 2016-02-18 17.11.03 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> I appear to need to modify the default application used
> by xdg-open to open a file directory. The man page of xdg-open
> is not very helpful. Can anybody tell me what is the right
> and general (I run fvwm) system-wide file on openbsd to edit?
Hello,
I appear to need to modify the default application used
by xdg-open to open a file directory. The man page of xdg-open
is not very helpful. Can anybody tell me what is the right
and general (I run fvwm) system-wide file on openbsd to edit?
Thanks
Ruda
Not as far as I can tell. It'd be via vmm if you can, so your options would be
openbsd or netbsd, neither quickly from what I've heard.
On Thu Feb 18 01:39:13 2016 GMT-0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Does hardware accelerated Qemu work on OpenBSD now? It didn't at the
> end of 2014.
>
> Thanks,
>
> S
On 18/02/16 13:22, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2016 Feb 18 (Thu) at 12:25:07 +0200 (+0200), Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
:>On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:>>Hi,
:>>
:>>I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
:>>requests to
Am 02/18/16 um 06:28 schrieb Andy Bradford:
>
> Anyway, just some musings. Is there anyone else out there using
> lpr/lpd/lprm from base? Maybe I'm the only one?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
I've connected a Kyocera FS-920 to my router and all hosts (*bsd, mac,
win) do their printing on it
On 2016-02-18, Steve Litt wrote:
> Does hardware accelerated Qemu work on OpenBSD now? It didn't at the
> end of 2014.
Not at present, no.
On 2016 Feb 18 (Thu) at 12:25:07 +0200 (+0200), Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
:>On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:>>Hi,
:>>
:>>I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
:>>requests to another carped dhcp server.
:>>After upgr
> Holger Glaess [gla...@glaessixs.de] wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ?
>>
>> is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ?
>
> Yes although there may be more speed optimization possible
>
>
hi
what about the hardware acceleration functions of
an
On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
requests to another carped dhcp server.
After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm seeing these in my logs:
What version were you running before?
31 matches
Mail list logo
