Re: Override NGROUPS_MAX

Hi, > Congratulations. You are no longer running OpenBSD. Your system > has a significant incompatibility, and now we cannot accept any > bug reports from you anymore. Any bug you hit might be due to that > change you made. You own the change. This is true, thanks for the reminder although

Re: strange behaviour spamd

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:53:01AM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote: > This seems flawed , because when I see a spammer sending a mail to 10 > addresses and I trap the spammer IP the grey entries shouldn't over ride the > Trap entry at all. I even put the ip on my personal blacklist and called the >

Re: Driving 4k Display for OpenBSD Workstation

Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:41:23 -0700 Bryan Vyhmeister > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:05:07PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > There is no kernel support for skylake and it will require firmware. > > https://01.org/linuxgraphics/intel-linux-graphics-firmwares > > > > The intel code

Re: iwm performance (was: Re: how would you troubleshoot your wifi?)

Am Freitag, den 22.07.2016, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Stefan Sperling: > I've already been told about iwm performance regressions compared to > 5.9, > so I'd like to make a statement (not just directed at you, Andreas, > but > at everyone). JFYI: A temporary workaround which works for me (on a X1C3)

Re: Network Interface "Intel I350 Fiber" 8 Port Module shows only 4 Ports

Re, > So, I've just adjusted my build scripts and jenkins-job and hit the > build button a few minutes ago to build a 5.9 stable image (yes it's not > current, but I didn't see any changes in plus.html concerning em > interfaces or pci stuff, but this will be the next step. just as a short

Re: Unable to open UPS device. [apcupsd]

Thanks a lot! I followed /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/apcupsd-3.14.1* and after recompiling my kernel my USB UPS works with apcupsd. #dmesg | grep UPS ugen0 at uhub1 port 1 "American Power Conversion Smart-UPS 2200 FW:UPS 09.3 / ID=18" rev 2.00/1.06 addr 2 On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:10:45

Re: Install OpenBSD on disks larger than 2TB

Hey, On 07/22/16 10:29, Alexander Hall wrote: How did you install the system? If you didn't already, use the installer and point it at the softraid disk (likely sd2). If that doesn't help, please show what happens. "i am unable to boot" tells us nothing. i used the installer for installing

iwm performance (was: Re: how would you troubleshoot your wifi?)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote: > sorry, my response was not precise - the "fatal" error is gone now but the > observed performance problems are still there. I've already been told about iwm performance regressions compared to 5.9, so I'd like to make a statement

Re: strange behaviour spamd

This seems flawed , because when I see a spammer sending a mail to 10 addresses and I trap the spammer IP the grey entries shouldn't over ride the Trap entry at all. I even put the ip on my personal blacklist and called the spamd-setup to take effect. At this point the grey entries shouldnt be

Re: Install OpenBSD on disks larger than 2TB

On July 21, 2016 7:56:57 PM GMT+02:00, Leo Unglaub wrote: >Hey, >i am using OpenBSD with two harddrives. Both of them are 2 TB and i put > >them in a Raid 1 (mirroring) using softraid0. It works perfect, the >system boots from the raid 1 and runs perfectly. > >Sadly now 2

Re: strange behaviour spamd

Greytrap addresses only trap the systems when it has not been seen before. In your case, they arlready have a GREY entry, so they have been seen and the trapping won't take effect. On 2016 Jul 21 (Thu) at 17:34:37 +0200 (+0200), Markus Rosjat wrote: :Hi there, : :I noticed that a trapped ip

Re: Question on Theo's dotSecurity paper

On 7/21/16, Ted Unangst wrote: > patrick keshishian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Quick question about Theo de Raadt's "Presentations: dotSecurity >> 2016"[1]. Slide 11 says "Most violations result in process being killed", >> not all violations? >> >> Just wanted clarification here. >