I have a Logitech c270. The box says it supports UVC, I've installed
uvideo-firmware, and it is recognized as a video device, but running
video(1) fails with an error:
video: ioctl VIDIOC_STREAMON: Invalid argument
There is also a kernel message:
uvideo0: could not open VS pipe: INVAL
Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:43:02 +0200 Walter Alejandro Iglesias
[...]
> The point is, I ask myself the same a lot of unix users probably are
> asking themselves, should I invest more time in educating myself in
> practices that in two days could be declared obsolete?
Hi Walter,
Hi misc@
The following message was sent to bugs@ but probably belongs here...
Libreboot is no longer a GNU project and they are keen to better support
OpenBSD and the *BSD's in general.
Cheers
Fred
Forwarded Message
Subject: Booting BSD on a Libreboot system -
dhill () mindcry ! org also posted message to bugs mailing
list probably about this issue.
Title/subject:
KASSERT((sk->inp == NULL) || (sk->inp->inp_pf_sk == NULL));
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=147472138723508=2
I also can confirm that relayd is triggering this kernel panic
on my system by
To the other people who answer me here, sorry for the delay, I took some
time to calm down and not degrade myself to the level of discussion some
person here proposed me.
Martin Brandenburg,
I know what pcap files are, I used them. But, as I said, I'm not an
expert, I didn't take in care that
Thanks for the tip, Stuart.
I’ll take a look at it.
> On 30 sep. 2016, at 03:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-29, mxb wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this is a remote, IPMI machine - no kbd while it is in ddb
>
> Many machines with IPMI do give
Hello,
I tried to boot from a CD with cd60.iso on
an old HP OmniBook XE3 (i386). The process gets
stuck with the last line
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
and does not get beyond that.
Is there any suggestion as to what I can try?
Thank you!
Ruda
Hello misc@
If I had this arrangement:
openbsd re0 --- unmanaged gigabit switch --- vdsl modem offering PPPoE
can I expect pppoe0 on the openbsd box to be able to communicate with
the modem and bring the line up?
Currently I have this arrangement, which works well:
openbsd re0 --- vdsl
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:47:33PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:40:16PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> | echo.c says
> |
> | /* This utility may NOT do getopt(3) option parsing. */
> |
> | Why is that, for echo(1) specifically?
> | Other binaries in /bin seem to use
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:46:35AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:19:58PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:13:43AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > > Can I redirect to the same server?
> >
> > I don't see why that shouldn't work.
> >
> > Put
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:19:58PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:13:43AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > Can I redirect to the same server?
>
> I don't see why that shouldn't work.
>
> Put your actual web service on some port on 127.0.0.1 and have
> relayd send the
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:40:16PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
| echo.c says
|
| /* This utility may NOT do getopt(3) option parsing. */
|
| Why is that, for echo(1) specifically?
| Other binaries in /bin seem to use getopt(3) freely.
Because echo should echo all arguments, including those
echo.c says
/* This utility may NOT do getopt(3) option parsing. */
Why is that, for echo(1) specifically?
Other binaries in /bin seem to use getopt(3) freely.
Jan
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:13:43AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> Can I redirect to the same server?
I don't see why that shouldn't work.
Put your actual web service on some port on 127.0.0.1 and have
relayd send the filtered traffic there.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:00:17PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Have you already considered running relayd(8) in front of your
> web service to filter out malicious requests?
>
> See the FILTER RULES section in relayd.conf(5).
>
No, I hadn't.
Can I redirect to the same server?
If so, I like
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Need an advice.
>
> I have a bgp router with 3 interfaces:
>
> em0 (xxx.yyy,zzz.1/24),
> em1, em2 - looking at uplinks
>
> bgp is up and running, packets are forwarded just fine. also there is nsd,
> listening on both em1,em2 serving my
Hi,
It was just bad scripting on my part. I ended up with this:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9805583271c200e5a2a92f621cdc48a0
All the best,
Murk
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Craig Skinner
wrote:
> Hi Murk,
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:50:44 +0200 Murk
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:20:38PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I am not sure what is appropriate, given netiqette and practicality for
> my server. I am sick of thousands of identical requests in my error log,
> plus I want to be able to look over my logs easily to find any real
> problems.
>
>
On 29 September 2016 at 03:20, Chris Bennett <
chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
> I am not sure what is appropriate, given netiqette and practicality for
> my server. I am sick of thousands of identical requests in my error log,
> plus I want to be able to look over my logs easily to
after all, it revealed to be just fiber connection fucked up, and
causing the enormous packet drops. sorry for the noise
On 29.09.16 10:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hi,
Need an advice.
I have a bgp router with 3 interfaces:
em0 (xxx.yyy,zzz.1/24),
em1, em2 - looking at uplinks
bgp is up
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:42:11AM +0200, Radek wrote:
> Hi,
> I have one web_serwer_1 behind OpenBSD 5.9 router/NAT with single IP.
>
> web_serwer_1 -apache,virtualhosts- (10.0.8.11):
> 1.domain.com
> 2.domain.com
> 3.domain.com
>
> pf.conf:
> pass in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from
Hi Gregory,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:30:05 +0300 Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> $ dig openbsd.org @127.0.0.1
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+deb8u6-Debian <<>> openbsd.org @127.0.0.1
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Debian isn't OpenBSD..
This means unbound
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:02:10PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Note that the machine has got 8 GB of physical memory and 8 GB of swap and
> > > that I have set datasize=infinity in /etc/login.conf. I got
> > > datasize=33554432 which seems to be the same as kern.shminfo.shmmax.
The number
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:10:21AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > Dear misc@
> >
> > I have searched the archives and read the documentation of login.conf(5),
> > ksh(1):ulimit and can not find how to limit the amount of
Hi Gregory,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:06:28 +0300 Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> I cannot use interfaces em1 and em2, it's where nsd is listening.
On OpenBSD, NSD listens on port 53,
and unbound sends queries out from various ports > 1023
On OpenBSD, there's no conflict.
An 'outgoing-interface: '
Hi Murk,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:50:44 +0200 Murk Fletcher wrote:
> I got this startup script for my app:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c0339b1dae3eeff3a461b8787824838b
> ... but in debugging I see these functions can't be found.
>From rc.subr(8), put your overrides inside the proper
Hi,
I have one web_serwer_1 behind OpenBSD 5.9 router/NAT with single IP.
web_serwer_1 -apache,virtualhosts- (10.0.8.11):
1.domain.com
2.domain.com
3.domain.com
pf.conf:
pass in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 80 rdr-to
$web_serwer_1 port 80 set prio (1, 6) keep
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> Dear misc@
>
> I have searched the archives and read the documentation of login.conf(5),
> ksh(1):ulimit and can not find how to limit the amount of physical memory a
> process may use.
>
> I have the following limits where I have
28 matches
Mail list logo