Re: Fwd: Booting BSD on a Libreboot system - documentation needed

I've started a stab at it. My x200 is in pieces at the moment and I want to retest my instructions before I submit a PR, so it may be a couple weeks. On 10/05, Leah Rowe wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks. Can you forward my message to the appropriate list, if it

umb is cool

I've got a WWAN card that required a bunch of fiddling with pppd under 5.9 to get online. I upgraded to 6.0 and my pppd dialup script stopped working. I soon discovered I had a new NIC: umb0. A man page read and an ifconfig command later, I've got a working WWAN-based connection to the

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:44:24AM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:20:33PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > > There's also a whole fucking manpage bundled with PerlDancer explaining in > > > some details

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:20:33PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > There's also a whole fucking manpage bundled with PerlDancer explaining in > > some details all the possible deployment options. > > Related, though, is that a

Re: Fwd: Booting BSD on a Libreboot system - documentation needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks. Can you forward my message to the appropriate list, if it hasn't already been forwarded? On 30/09/16 23:51, Fred wrote: > Hi misc@ > > The following message was sent to bugs@ but probably belongs > here... > > Libreboot is no longer a GNU

netsnmpd Fails to Start on Current

Hello I updated to the Oct 2 AMD64 snapshot yesterday. I then updated to the Oct 3 AMD64 snapshot today. After updating to the Oct 2 snapshot, I noticed that netsnmpd (from packages) was "failed" on reboot. I updated all the packages (pkg_add -vui), but had a failure ("bad minor" or something

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Chris Bennett wrote: Thanks to stu@, he's informed me that mod_perl is a big problem for OpenBSD modernising its Perl forward. So I'm going to try and move to FastCGI. [...] I'm going to go study FastCGI myself now. I think perhaps there is a much better and simpler

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

Zé, thank you for your answers! I hope my question didn't offence you; as you remember I asked for help and you kindly offered your configs, which I really appreciate, especially since it seems to be quite a rare setup. I asked you because I tried to replicate your config with "egress" keyword;

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

> On 04/10/2016, at 18:48, Pavel Korovin wrote: > > On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: >>> On 04/10/2016, at 11:58, Pavel Korovin wrote: >>> On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: On "the wanderer" iked.conf: ikev2 home active esp \ from egress to

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: > > On 04/10/2016, at 11:58, Pavel Korovin wrote: > > > >> On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: > >> On "the wanderer" iked.conf: > >> > >> ikev2 home active esp \ > >>from egress to 192.168.99.0/24 \ > >>local egress peer vpn.example.com \ > >>srcid

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

> On 04/10/2016, at 11:58, Pavel Korovin wrote: > >> On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: >> On "the wanderer" iked.conf: >> >> ikev2 home active esp \ >>from egress to 192.168.99.0/24 \ >>local egress peer vpn.example.com \ >>srcid dion.example.com dstid vpn.example.com >> >>

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:20:33PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > There's also a whole fucking manpage bundled with PerlDancer explaining in > > some details all the possible deployment options. > > Related, though, is that a

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > There's also a whole fucking manpage bundled with PerlDancer explaining in > some details all the possible deployment options. Related, though, is that a lot (but not all) of this documentation assumes the reader understands

Re: Logitech c270 HD Webcam

On 01/10/2016 04:03, Colton Lewis wrote: I have a Logitech c270. The box says it supports UVC, I've installed uvideo-firmware, and it is recognized as a video device, but running video(1) fails with an error: video: ioctl VIDIOC_STREAMON: Invalid argument There is also a kernel message:

em(4) watchdog timeotu on current/amd64

This is current/amd64 on Dell Latitude E5570 (dmesg below). I am experiencing em(4) watchdog timeouts. As long as the ethernet cable is in, everything works fine. But once I disconnect the cable and reconnect, my em0 will never get a DHCP lease again. Running 'sh /etc/netstart em0' will result

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:48:58PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:45:10PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > > I gave a talk about moving from mod_perl to Plack and FastCGI at the local > > perlmonger group. It was fairly straight forward and there are a fair number > > of options

some more info on pkg_add/fw_update changes

About a week ago, we switched to the new signing scheme by default. There are good reasons to bury the old signing scheme completely, so this is what's currently happening, there are some rough edges. Technically speaking, the new signatures are "outside", they're in the gzip header, and the only

Re: Forget mod_perl. I'm going to try to move to FastCGI and base http

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:45:10PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > I gave a talk about moving from mod_perl to Plack and FastCGI at the local > perlmonger group. It was fairly straight forward and there are a fair number > of options on the CPAN, although I'm unsure which have ports. > >

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: > On "the wanderer" iked.conf: > > ikev2 home active esp \ > from egress to 192.168.99.0/24 \ > local egress peer vpn.example.com \ > srcid dion.example.com dstid vpn.example.com > > On the "wanderer" pf.conf: > > match out on enc0 from any to

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

Zé, thank you for your detailed reply! I put some comments in your message below. On 10/04, Zé Loff wrote: > If you mean OpenBSD "at the office" and OpenBSD on a roaming laptop, > this works for me (tm): > > "At the office" iked.conf: > > ikev2 dion passive esp \ > from 192.168.99.0/24

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

On 09:47 Tue 04 Oct, Pavel Korovin wrote: > Discussed with Michael off-the-list and found that he has different > setup where iked(8) is not involved. > > Just in case, my question is about OpenBSD native iked(8) setup for > remote access VPN gateway to serve OpenBSD native iked(8) client. > If

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

If you mean OpenBSD "at the office" and OpenBSD on a roaming laptop, this works for me (tm): "At the office" iked.conf: ikev2 dion passive esp \ from 192.168.99.0/24 to 192.168.100.3 \ local 192.168.99.1 peer any \ srcid vpn.example.com dstid dion.example.com On "the

Re: iked(8) OpenBSD road warrior setup anybody?

Discussed with Michael off-the-list and found that he has different setup where iked(8) is not involved. Just in case, my question is about OpenBSD native iked(8) setup for remote access VPN gateway to serve OpenBSD native iked(8) client. If anybody has such setup and/or willing to discuss the

Re: CARP host with lower advskew not becoming master

On 2016 Oct 04 (Tue) at 09:27:50 +0200 (+0200), Jasper Siepkes wrote: :Hi list! : :I'm experimenting with CARP and I'm a bit puzzled by the following :behavior; I have 2 hosts setup in an active/passive way with CARP. :Host A has an advskew of 0 and becomes master, Host B has an :advskew of 100

Re: CARP host with lower advskew not becoming master

Silly me... I forgot the 'net.inet.carp.preempt' sysctl variable. I thought it was only for forcing demotion of other CARP interfaces if a single one failed. But it's also for "claiming" the master spot. Sorry for the noise :-( > Op 4 oktober 2016 om 9:27 schreef Jasper Siepkes

CARP host with lower advskew not becoming master

Hi list! I'm experimenting with CARP and I'm a bit puzzled by the following behavior; I have 2 hosts setup in an active/passive way with CARP. Host A has an advskew of 0 and becomes master, Host B has an advskew of 100 and becomes backup. Now when host A fails host B becomes master just like i