Re: Canada and Software Backdoors

It's not possible, in the general case, to provide a backdoor on user supplied encryption, steneography nor user supplied useless and/or trivial garbage. It is, however, possible to claim to have done so and/or to address some of the most common things people do. -- Raul On Mon, Dec 5, 2016

Re: HP Proliant MicroServer G8: not seeing disks [solved]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 02:21:15PM +0100, Stephane HUC "CIOTBSD" wrote: > Hi Stuart. > > What microserver would you recommend?! > > Le 12/03/16 ? 12:08, Stuart Henderson a ?crit : > > On 2016-12-02, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > >> My only complaint is that due to the maze of

Re: Lenovo Yoga 2 11

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:30:06AM +0800, Denny White wrote: > Trying to find out if anyone has had any luck with OBSD on a Lenovo > Yoga 2 11 or anything close to that model in the Yoga line. I got it > to boot off usb using amd64 iso due to the Yoga using UEFI. I > hadn???t ran OBSD in quite a

Re: IPSEC from behind NAT stage 2 failure

Yes on the diagram, I should have noted that I just deleted the psk rather than sending it out on email, pf.conf and npppd.conf follow Thanks, Robert Szasz npppd.conf - # $OpenBSD: npppd.conf,v 1.2 2014/03/22 04:32:39 yasuoka Exp $ # sample npppd configuration file. see npppd.conf(5)

Re: Canada and Software Backdoors

On 2016-12-05 05:41, Theodoros wrote: Hello misc, I would like your comments on how could the below affect OpenBSD; if at all. link: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/canada-software-encryption-backdoors-feedback,33131.html Best greetings, Theodore How i read this, it doesn't look like

Re: IPSEC from behind NAT stage 2 failure

Robert, On Mon, 5 Dec 2016, Robert Szasz wrote: I'm testing with the following setup Win10 ->obsd5.9(firewall doing nat)->{}->obsd5.9(IPSEC) Do you mean? Win10 ->obsd5.9(firewall doing nat)->{INTERNET}->obsd5.9(IPSEC) The connection process fails at stage 2 with the error message

IPSEC from behind NAT stage 2 failure

I'm trying to set up an L2TP/IPSEC tunnel for roaming windows users to tunnel in to our office network. I'm testing with the following setup Win10 ->obsd5.9(firewall doing nat)->{}->obsd5.9(IPSEC) I'd like something reasonably robust, able to pass through most NAT a user might find

vmwpvs driver

Hello misc, Some days ago , I tried to install OpenBSD 6.0 using vmwpvs ( Vmware Paravirtual ) When obsd installer finish, I received a message that the boot could not been done using my disk. So I did a research on OBSD mailing lists and found: "There's a problem with vmwpvs(4) where the

Lenovo Yoga 2 11

Trying to find out if anyone has had any luck with OBSD on a Lenovo Yoga 2 11 or anything close to that model in the Yoga line. I got it to boot off usb using amd64 iso due to the Yoga using UEFI. I hadn’t ran OBSD in quite a while, dumbassed out & forgot to save a dmesg or ifconfig output, but I

Re: Installer : deselecting X* sets if user doesn't want to run X

Clément 'wxcafé' Hertling wrote on 12/03/16 07:29: Hey, So each time I install an OpenBSD system I have to both answer no as to whether I want to run X on the system, and then deselect the X* sets. It's not a big thing, but I thought it couldn't be that hard to make it automatic, that is, if

Re: FAQ update

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:12:49AM -0800, Todd Carpenter wrote: > Next, create the mirror with the bioctl(8) > command. > > # *bioctl -c 1 -l sd0a,sd1a softraid0* > > > *Thats good, but the next part shows* > > > # *bioctl -c C -l sd0a softraid0* > New

Re: OpenBSD's binutils

On 06/12/16 06:56, Stuart Longland wrote: > On 06/12/16 01:31, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: >>> I started it off yesterday afternoon and this evening I note that the llvm/clang build failed with an "out of memory" error. I've re-started on the off-chance it was a temporary issue, but I

Re: OpenBSD's binutils

On 06/12/16 01:31, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: >> I started it off yesterday afternoon and this evening I note that the >> > llvm/clang build failed with an "out of memory" error. I've re-started >> > on the off-chance it was a temporary issue, but I doubt it. > The OOM can also be a limit in

Re: FAQ update

The first command will create a new virtual drive device ( sd2 perhaps?) and you'll want to create your softraid crypto volume on that device, not on sd0. Note that I've never tried this, and that the bootloader might need some additional help after you have the striped softraid encrypted. On

FAQ update

Hi guys, I was wondering if you could update the documentation to show how to both strip and geli encrypt the device.. cut -- to Next, create the mirror with the bioctl(8) command. # *bioctl -c 1 -l sd0a,sd1a softraid0* *Thats good, but the next part shows*

Re: OpenBSD's binutils

On Monday, December 5, 2016 11:05 CET, Stuart Longland wrote: > On 28/11/16 21:10, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > You are right, gcc 4.9 generates some code using opcodes that need newer gas. > > Try building the port with clang (it would also help the case where the

Re: cwm window manager usage, hidden windows

On Mon 2016.12.05 at 14:21 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying cwm for a while and would like to > ask a question about it. As cwm seems to be developed > within openbsd, I dare ask here. > > I seem to need desktops, thus my .cwmrc contains > > sticky yes > bind M-1

Re: IPv6 Setup not working on Hetzner server

+1 ping -c 1 fe80::1%em0 > /dev/null 2016-12-05 11:05 GMT-02:00 Marc Peters : > Am 12/02/16 um 13:39 schrieb Leo Unglaub: > > I just found out that since i changed my mygate up to your suggestion > > that i now have to ping6 fe80::1%em0 first and then i am able to > > connecto

Re: IPv6 Setup not working on Hetzner server

On 05/12/16(Mon) 14:05, Marc Peters wrote: > Am 12/02/16 um 13:39 schrieb Leo Unglaub: > > I just found out that since i changed my mygate up to your suggestion > > that i now have to ping6 fe80::1%em0 first and then i am able to > > connecto to other hosts via IPv6. But not before i pinged the >

cwm window manager usage, hidden windows

Hello, I've been trying cwm for a while and would like to ask a question about it. As cwm seems to be developed within openbsd, I dare ask here. I seem to need desktops, thus my .cwmrc contains sticky yes bind M-1grouponly1 bind M-2grouponly2 bind M-3grouponly3 bind M-4

Re: IPv6 Setup not working on Hetzner server

Am 12/02/16 um 13:39 schrieb Leo Unglaub: > I just found out that since i changed my mygate up to your suggestion > that i now have to ping6 fe80::1%em0 first and then i am able to > connecto to other hosts via IPv6. But not before i pinged the > fe80::1%em0. WTF? i have the same setup at hetzner

Re: Setting MAC address of vm in vm.conf with lladdr

Reyk Floeter writes: > I cannot reproduce it, it works as intended. Are you sure that you > were looking at the MAC address on the "VM guest side" and not on the > host side, as mentioned in vm.conf(5): > > lladdr etheraddr > Change the link

Canada and Software Backdoors

Hello misc, I would like your comments on how could the below affect OpenBSD; if at all. link: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/canada-software-encryption-backdoors-feedback,33131.html Best greetings, Theodore

Re: OpenBSD's binutils

On 28/11/16 21:10, Stuart Henderson wrote: > You are right, gcc 4.9 generates some code using opcodes that need newer gas. > Try building the port with clang (it would also help the case where the port > itself has asm needing a newer assembler; clang has an integrated assembler > which generally

Re: Setting MAC address of vm in vm.conf with lladdr

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:55:32AM -0600, Eric Brown wrote: > Dear List, > > I am using the current snapshot (Dec 3 as of this post), and I am trying > to set the MAC address of a vm host in vm.conf. > > However, the MAC address reported by ifconfig -a seems to change with > each restart. The

Re: IPv6 Setup not working on Hetzner server

On Friday, December 2, 2016 13:39 CET, Leo Unglaub wrote: > Hey, > > On 12/02/16 13:14, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > This is a link-local address, you have to specify the interface scope id: > > > > $ cat /etc/mygate > > 144.76.102.193 > > fe80::1%em0 > > thanks for the hint. I