Sorry for the double posting.
But Just to add to the info, the RFC 3177 did specify assignment to
remote site even house being /48 and big site like /47
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3177
Crazy.
The revise version of it RFC 6177 correct that crazy assignment and
specif that you should do /56.
Hi,
I am not sure you got that right.
If you are an ISP the minimum assignment is /32 and you assigned /48 to
end company and /56 to users.
If you asked me that's a wasted, but that's what they suggest.
For end users, a /64 would be plenty if you asked me and /56 for company
would be plenty as
On 8/10/18 10:38 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure you got that right.
>
> If you are an ISP the minimum assignment is /32 and you assigned /48 to
> end company and /56 to users.
>
> If you asked me that's a wasted, but that's what they suggest.
>
> For end users, a /64
It doesn't natively support OpenBSD.
When you run anything that writes something, that something will have your
umask. If you run something as root, set root's umask before running it, not
afterwards. Write a script that sets the umask and runs sshfs, then run the
script using doas.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 15:13, Hiltjo Posthuma
On August 10, 2018 3:57 PM, Henry Bonath he...@thebonaths.com wrote:
> Also could it be that you are using IPv6, not IPv4? (and your IPv6 is
> missing its gateway)
> If the IPv6 gateway is bad/missing you'll get that "no route to host"
> message.
I've encountered that issue before, but it isn't
Also could it be that you are using IPv6, not IPv4? (and your IPv6 is
missing its gateway)
If the IPv6 gateway is bad/missing you'll get that "no route to host"
message.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2018-08-07, traveller wrote:
> > After OpenBSD, one too many
On 2018-08-07, traveller wrote:
> After OpenBSD, one too many “/“
That won't cause this.
> On Aug 7, 2018, 11:16 AM -0700, Benjamin Walkenhorst
> , wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I recently installed OpenBSD 6.3 in a VPS.
>>
>> In the last few days, I get an error message when running
On 2018-08-08, Mik J wrote:
> Hello Daren,
> Thank you for your answer, I didn't see it earlier today.
> This change in current makes sense to me.
> Regards
>
>
> Le mercredi 8 août 2018 à 06:07:10 UTC+2, Darren Tucker
> a écrit :
>
> On 8 August 2018 at 05:29, Mik J wrote:
>> Does
Dear readers,
I just installed / syspatch a fresh 6.3 and i was not able to get the
network working
inside the alpine-virt-3.8.0-x86_64.iso kernel .
I tried -L ( witch create a TAP with 100.64.id network :S ), and -n
and -i with manual bridge setup.
I see packets going through and arp replies
I saw a week ago this commit from florian:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=153294104203261
Shouldn't this apply also to 6.3 ?
Just a doubt not a complain.
Elias.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:38:52AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:44:39PM +0200, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I run
> >
> > doas sshfs syk...@pc109.fzu.cz: /home/ruda/mnt/fzu -o uid=1000 -o gid=1000
> >
> > But then the mount point is owned (after the
Mark Prins-2 wrote
> On 27-07-18 14:03, tao wrote:
>> Rashad Kanavath wrote
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:36 AM tao
>>
>>> uponmyword@
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I am in OpenBSD6.3. QGIS 2.18.17 in packages can not render style just
like
things in
Ingo,
Thank you for the detailed explanation. I wasn't thinking about atomically
handling both at the same time. I also see why lsof in Linux can be
deceiving.
@marc Yes I think it is of pretty poor design. With Ingo's explanation and
the fact they both read /proc and/or use lsof.
And the
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:29:04PM -0500, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I was looking to port bleachbit, system cleanup tool, to OpenBSD and one
> function is to make sure certain files are not in use before it proceeds. An
> example would be cache files by a browser which would need
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:44:39PM +0200, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I run
>
> doas sshfs syk...@pc109.fzu.cz: /home/ruda/mnt/fzu -o uid=1000 -o gid=1000
>
> But then the mount point is owned (after the mounting) by root:
>
> drwx-- 1 root wheel512 Aug 3 13:22 fzu
>
> Hence
16 matches
Mail list logo
