On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:43 AM Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:14:45PM -0900, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
...
> > Does our make have some logic in the -jN handling to detect and prevent
> > that, Marc?
>
> Philip, is that a rhetorical question ?
>
Heh, no. Just the question of
On 09/04/18 20:04, Heinz Kampmann wrote:
--
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 04. September 2018 um 23:00 Uhr
*Von:* "STeve Andre'"
*An:* "Kevin Chadwick" , misc@openbsd.org
*Betreff:* Re: Lesser evil
On 09/04/18 09:09, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Um, maybe I'm not writing well. I'm
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:06:52AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> Just move /usr/ports back to /usr and remount /dev/sd0g as /usr/local
A perfectly reasonable suggestion, something I thought about. I kind of want to
tweak this and learn a little bit to make things better so I am going to give
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:35:04 -0700
Chris Bennett wrote:
> OK
> I see that i needed to use fdisk -v
>
> Any need to preserve any existing stuff? (and how if so?)
>
>
> Primary GPT:
> Disk: sd0 Usable LBA: 34 to 1953525134 [1953525168 Sectors]
> GUID: 0b27fac9-4c45-460c-b321-f6ba7ccacfb9
>
--Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. September 2018 um 23:00
Uhr
Von: "STeve Andre'"
An: "Kevin Chadwick" , misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Lesser evil
On 09/04/18 09:09, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Um, maybe I'm not writing well.
I'm talking about a dual-boot Windows
OpenBSD system, which
> so is there anything I could do to be able to use the console?
Try setting a lower baud rate in Alpine’s /etc/inittab.
(and in the linux kernel command line)
That’s how I worked around the same issue.
Regards,
Joe
On 09/04/18 09:09, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:03:06 -0400
I would not try to dual boot Windows and OpenBSD. There are too
many disgusting viri out that smash parts of partitions. OpenBSD
or anything else on the disk is a sitting duck once not active. Don't
do it. The
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:35:38PM +0200, vincent delft wrote:
> In fact, I remain with my initial question:
> why arp having an entry with address "incomplete" on em0 does not perform
> the task when iwm0 is triggered and request a connection to my firewall ?
> The fw is running on the same
Re-hello,
The trunk is working fine at my office (between cable and wifi).
I will need more time to better evaluate it. But this sounds indeed
matching the need.
But
With this trunk now configured, I'm no more able to select the wifi at
customer site.
Indeed, at customer, I have 2 different
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:16:26 -0400
Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 12:05:01 -0500, "Karl O. Pinc"
> wrote:
>
> > Ssh in OpenBSD 6.3 (stable), and I presume 6.2, is vulnerable
> > to username existance checking by remote systems.
>
> It was already discussed on the list:
>
Hey there,
I personally use restic
https://restic.net/
together with Wasabi
https://wasabi.com/
with their S3 API. Give it a try, it's super cheap and reliable. It's
also in the ports tree, although I take the latest version from the
Homepage.
Regards,
Stephan
On 9/2/18 4:43
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 12:05:01 -0500, "Karl O. Pinc" wrote:
> Ssh in OpenBSD 6.3 (stable), and I presume 6.2, is vulnerable
> to username existance checking by remote systems.
It was already discussed on the list:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=153512055014488=2
Cheers,
Daniel
Ken M [k...@mack-z.com] wrote:
>
> $ df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/sd0a 1005M245M710M26%/
> /dev/sd0h 62.9G 21.7G 38.1G36%/home
> /dev/sd0d 3.9G302K3.7G 0%/tmp
> /dev/sd0f 14.8G 11.6G2.5G
Hi,
Ssh in OpenBSD 6.3 (stable), and I presume 6.2, is vulnerable
to username existance checking by remote systems.
OpenBSD current has a patch.
https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/779974d35b4859c07bc3cb8a12c74b43b0a7d1e0
Demonstration code is found here:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:00:11 -0700
> Amazon
> Prime Video and some other stuff now. But between my Android phone and
> Amazon Fire 5 tablet, I can do that stuff anyway, so not really a big
> loss.
If I can get it done easily on OpenBSD, I do.
WRT Amazon prime I have found that they drop the
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 01:35:05PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Atleast with Windows you have a good idea before you install what risks
> you are taking even in a bad case of some ancient sha1 signed file from
> a http link. With OpenBSD, I hope that the packaging community is
> security
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 03:04:15PM +, Jiri B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have couple of softraid devices available in a box and when I do upgrade
> I always have to check and not to make mistake which softraid device
> I want to use as root disk.
FWIW, the upgrade won't proceed until you pick a disk
Hi,
I have couple of softraid devices available in a box and when I do upgrade
I always have to check and not to make mistake which softraid device
I want to use as root disk.
If OpenBSD would have serial for softraid device I would just need to remember
the serial for my root disk.
This is
Kevin Chadwick writes:
> Windows updates do still take way too long though and perhaps they are
> gathering usage information, not that I care much. I hear they are
> working on the speed in insider previews.
Windows 10 has a lot of telemetry and data collection that sends
information back to
On September 4, 2018 2:11:11 PM UTC, Maurice McCarthy
wrote:
>On 03/09/2018, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
>
>> Is there any way to use the DRM drivers without X11 ?
>
>Probably not. The X sets in base are an integral part of the whole
>operating system. You install them whether or not you use X.
On 03/09/2018, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> Is there any way to use the DRM drivers without X11 ?
Probably not. The X sets in base are an integral part of the whole
operating system. You install them whether or not you use X.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:42:39 -0400 (EDT)
> Does it make sense to accept such compromises and run Linux for
> security and privacy OR is the better security and privacy of Linux
> more or less a myth and running Windows would be almost the same in
> that respect?
>
> I understand that any
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:03:06 -0400
> I would not try to dual boot Windows and OpenBSD. There are too
> many disgusting viri out that smash parts of partitions. OpenBSD
> or anything else on the disk is a sitting duck once not active. Don't
> do it. The AV situation on Windows is out of
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
There is a specific piece of software that turned out to be available
only on Windows and MacOS, Linux was not an option, neither (of course)
was OpenBSD.
Or, for example, only in Windoze, because it is a very specific software
delivered with
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 21:07, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 20:43, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> > I connect to the console with the 'vmctl console' command.
> > At various moments I am no longer able to write anything,
> > the alpine system as if freezes.
>
> It seems to be a
> As far as I know, since there is no explicit cases in the switch
> statement, the value is not used at all, and the compiler never
generates code to dereference the pointer.
...
That is true. Thank you all for answers and for link.
Sorry for the noise, this was a stack size problem, fixed with ulimit.
Now to figure why the patch fails to apply with the ocaml patch.
Cheers
Adam
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On September 4, 2018 3:31 PM, Adam Steen wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to install mirage[1] with opam install
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:14:45PM -0900, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 AM Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > Our make is perfectly happy generating several targets with one rule.
> >
> > The only thing we're actually missing wrt % is suffixes rules with
> > multiple results.
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:53:17AM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> why ? well all interactive process get a quarter range nice priority
> advance compared to all daemon tasks, at least for a laptop
> environment it really makes sense. sndiod and ntpd are unaffected by
> this change.
>
> you're
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:53:17AM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> why ? well all interactive process get a quarter range nice priority
> advance compared to all daemon tasks, at least for a laptop
> environment it really makes sense. sndiod and ntpd are unaffected by
> this change.
>
> you're
and it's like 6 new lines in rc.subr no big deal
Le mar. 4 sept. 2018 à 10:53, Thomas de Grivel a écrit :
>
> why ? well all interactive process get a quarter range nice priority
> advance compared to all daemon tasks, at least for a laptop
> environment it really makes sense. sndiod and ntpd are
why ? well all interactive process get a quarter range nice priority
advance compared to all daemon tasks, at least for a laptop
environment it really makes sense. sndiod and ntpd are unaffected by
this change.
you're right to criticize in that I did not document my code, the
point of this new
for APU it’s worth mentioning there are 2 versions in regards of network
performance: i210 and i211 NIC chip.
i210 (apu2c4) suppose to be faster and more feature-rich, while i211 is “value
product”.
But since i have only i210AT version and never see head-to-head comparisons
there is nothing
Hi All
I am trying to install mirage[1] with opam install mirage but building parsexp
v0.11.0 fails with SEGV [2]. This is on an amd64/current machine.
I am trying this with an OPAM 2 built from source.
I tried with chrisz@ patch for ocaml 4.07 et al [3] but num fails to build when
the
34 matches
Mail list logo
