Re: LDPD Crashing

On 2019/03/03 16:11, Henry Bonath wrote: > Thank you for the information on debugging, although I am not sure > that I will know what to do with the output once I get them. Include it in an email. Preferably write up as much information as possible into one self-contained email, including the

Re: LDPD Crashing

Thank you for the information on debugging, although I am not sure that I will know what to do with the output once I get them. I'm also not positive that the program is actually "crashing" either. Here is what is going on network-wise which I think may be contributing to the problem. I can

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

Tony, Are you out of your mind? You didn't provide even a rough hint about what your firewall configuration looks like. You recognize that's pathetic, right? > Earlier in the week I could run parallel ping-pong tests through my test > firewalls > at 300kpps without any packet loss. I updated

Packet loss with latest snapshot

Earlier in the week I could run parallel ping-pong tests through my test firewalls at 300kpps without any packet loss. I updated to the latest snapshot today and start to see packet loss at around 80kpps. /T OpenBSD 6.5-beta (GENERIC.MP) #764: Sun Mar 3 10:24:08 MST 2019

Re: man httpd.conf option does not mention option blocks

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 01:05:54PM -0600, Alfred Morgan wrote: > There are two formats you can write options in and the man page does not > mention format 2. > > format 1: > tls key "/etc/ssl/private/server.key" > tls certificate "/etc/ssl/server.crt" > > format 2: > tls { > key

man httpd.conf option does not mention option blocks

There are two formats you can write options in and the man page does not mention format 2. format 1: tls key "/etc/ssl/private/server.key" tls certificate "/etc/ssl/server.crt" format 2: tls { key "/etc/ssl/private/server.key" certificate "/etc/ssl/server.crt" } Besides this, https is

Re: Wireless Stack improvements and hacking

> Theo, >>> >>> Thank you so much for the wireless stack improvements in OpenBSD 6.5. >>> >>> I would though like you to focus on Radio Frequency attacks rather than >>> just code. >>> >> I'm not asking you to become an RF Engineer lol >> >>> Everything we use to communicate

Re: What is the future of the multicast routing daemons in OpenBSD?

Hello Joe, Did you get answers about your questions ? I'm currently trying to design a network with obsd routers, and my first tests with dvmrpd and rmouted are very very worying with VLANs. Many thanks for share your findings Cheers Luthing -- Sent from:

Re: Current thinking on OpenBSD "router" "firewall" role separation ?

Mar 3, 2019, 11:34 AM by s...@spacehopper.org: > On 2019-03-02, Rachel Roch <> rr...@tutanota.de > > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would be interested to find out the community's view on whether separating >> "router" and "firewall" roles is still a good thing or whether

Re: Current thinking on OpenBSD "router" "firewall" role separation ?

On 2019-03-02, Rachel Roch wrote: > Hi, > > I would be interested to find out the community's view on whether separating > "router" and "firewall" roles is still a good thing or whether developments > in recent iterations of OpenBSD would permit aggregation whilst maintaining > integrity and

Re: LDPD Crashing

On 2019-03-03, Henry Bonath wrote: > To elaborate, after enabling ldpd with - I have observed the > following in the log output: > > Mar 3 00:58:37 mpls-gw ldpd[77048]: nbr_fsm: event SESSION CLOSE > resulted in action CLOSE SESSION and changing state for lsr-id > 100.92.64.68 from