On 06.04., LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Hi Bruno!
>
> Bruno Flückiger @ 2019-04-02T06:58:15 +0200:
> > On 01.04., LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > Hey Bruno!
> > >
> >
> > Hi Dani
> >
> > > That's the most curious thing, nothing shows up in the logs when the app
> > > says "Download failed/Could not download ".
Looks to me like you're not running bsd.mp. A dmesg would clear this up.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:19 AM Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:54:35PM +, Ipsen S Ripsbusker wrote:
>
> > My hw.ncpu and hw.ncpuonline are less than my hw.ncpufound.
> > I tried setting hw.smt, but
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 02:14, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> [...]
> It basically should be able convert the serial port to TCP/IP
> networking. Is this something anyone else has used before -- or if you
> know something similar, I'm really interested!
>
I use a gl.inet GL-AR150 (US$24 on dx.com) running
> totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
Will try to make tests these days + will attach dmesg. Anyway, without a
FS (sequentially writing to a raw device) we'd be testing just the
sequential speed to a raw device, not even to a partition. I think this
would be a practical maximum
Hi Stuart
Thank you very much for the link.
The total ssh based performace depends strongly on the server hardware
(and installed OSes).
For the "fastest" test configuration (server hardware / installed OS) I
was possible to achieve
a total trasfer speed of approx 400MBytes/s (on the 10Gbit
Am 08.04.2019 23:46, schrieb Anatoli:
Thank you very much for the idea Anatoli!
Running dd with "/dev/zero" and "/dev/null" gave me back a very good
overview what is going on (different server hardware and operating systems)
ironm@wheezy:~$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=file1.tmp bs=1M count=4096
Hi
> Whats your performance without scp? tcpbench / netcat, for example?
Thank you very much for your hint. I did not run them yet (only iperf3
as listed below)
Further test details are in attached files.
Kind regards
Mark
--
m...@it-infrastrukturen.org
Am 08.04.2019 22:06, schrieb Abel
Hi Anatoly
Thank you very much for your helpfull hints.
The CPU usage (one of available cores) was nearly 100%.
FreeBSD 13.0 and Linux (Debian) seem currently to have faster network
stacks (and faster mass storage handling).
During test I used debian linux running in live mode (transfer to
Hi Peter
Thank you very much for your feedback.
It looks like the performance issue is more complex than I have expected.
Just for the test I have installed OpenBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 13.0 on few
different servers and compared results (details are in attached files).
Pure network speed I have
Hello Tom
Thank you very much for your hint.
I have disabled pf with "pfctrl -d" command but didn't notice any
difference in the 10GBit transfer speed.
The CPU usage was high (like 100% for one of the available CPU cores)
# Single send
obsdsrv2$ scp 4GByte-random.bin
Thanks Claudio, I was hoping you would see this.
I know that you guys fixed some other MPLS bugs as I was affected by
the LDP/ARP issue as well.
I have one PE running -current that I confirmed was no longer getting
the LDP drops/crashes
but I have not tested this against it as I just discovered
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> That doesn't answer the question: if you say
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100
> what transfer rate is reported
>
totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
> That number represents the maximum possible long-term
On 2019-04-07, Mark Schneider wrote:
> Short feedback:
>
> Just for the test I have checked the 10GBit network performance
> between two FreeBSD 13.0 servers (both HP DL380g7 machines)
> transfering data in both directions
>
> # ---
> ironm@fbsdsrv2:~ $ scp ironm@200.0.0.10:/home/ironm/t2.iso
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 05:08:32PM -0400, Henry Bonath wrote:
> Hello, I am seeing some BGP VPNv4 routes staying populated in
> the RIB of route-reflector clients even after dropping the originating
> neighbor.
>
> I'm on OpenBSD 6.4, running MPLS L3VPN.
>
> I have 2 IBGP route-reflectors, both
Hi everyone,
I am trying to connect to a Vax simulation running under simh on the
same OpenBSD host.
I have set up the networking as follows but cannot ping or telnet to
the virtual Vax. Here are my config files, perhaps some knowledgeable
person could explain what I am doing wrong?
The tap
15 matches
Mail list logo
