* gwes [2020-05-03 19:10:35 -0400]:
> Currently axen.c has its PHY address hardwired to 3.
> I have a StarTech which has the PHY at 0.
> The driver currently searches for all PHYs connected to the MII
> and then ignores the result.
> I want to test my fix on devices which work now.
>
> Can
Hello all,
First post here. So please be indulgent ;-)). My question is about the
speedtest-cli tool and the tests results with OpenBsd.Let me explain. I have
multiple machines - physical and virtual - mix of BSD and Linux - and I am in a
process of rebuilding my Firewall - obviously with
Hello Kanto,
speedtest-cli is horribly inaccurate in my experience. I used it when I
first started using OpenBSD as a router and spent mor etime than I care
to admit "troubleshooting" before realizing I was getting the correct
speeds on devices on the network.
To be fair, and since it has
Hi Kanto,
The Edgerouter Lite will not push much more than 200mbps, so that will
certainly be a bottleneck. The only reason the ERlite can push 1Gbit
with stock firmware is because of proprietary cut through routing and
other garbage -- what they dont tell you is that as soon as you enable
I saw the recent thread regarding multiple domains and filter-dkimsign.
I just wanted to add in my $.02 that I prefer to have as much
proof-of-work as reasonable since it seems, at least a little, to help
with inboxing at the oligopoly providers. The trend for them to direct
legitimate mail
Jan Betlach @ 2020-05-05 17:05 IST:
> Is 6.7 being released already?
No, they're probably using a snapshot.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 5/5/20 7:15 PM, Paul N. Pace wrote:
> I saw the recent thread regarding multiple domains and filter-dkimsign.
>
> I just wanted to add in my $.02 that I prefer to have as much
> proof-of-work as reasonable since it seems, at least a little, to help
> with inboxing at the oligopoly providers.
On 2020-05-04, Kalle Kadakas wrote:
> Greetings OpenBSD community,
>
> I am running into severe bandwidth limitations whilst passing traffic
> through an OpenBSD firewall.
> The NIC in use is an Intel 10Gb 2-port X520 adapter from which I would
> hope to pass through at least 7Gbps+, yet the
Thanks. My bad, I’ve realized that as soon as I’ve hit the send button.
On 5 May 2020, at 17:19, Andinus wrote:
> Jan Betlach @ 2020-05-05 17:05 IST:
>
>> Is 6.7 being released already?
>
> No, they're probably using a snapshot.
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:43 PM Marko Cupać wrote:
> ...so I can permit hosts on guest vlan access Internet hosts, but not
> hosts on other private vlans similar to:
>
> block log all
> pass in on $guest_vlan from $guest_vlan:network to
>
I suspect the best path forward here is:
block log all
Is 6.7 being released already?
Jan
On 5 May 2020, at 13:28, Groot wrote:
> I tried updating all applications, only to be greeted with
> the following message.
>
> doas pkg_add -u
> https://ftp.OpenBSD.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.7/packages/amd64/: no such dir
> list of applications
>
> I'm sure
Hi,
We have sent the pcap directly for the raw packets.
In terms of the above change, we haven't compiled ospf previously, we will
give it a go and see how we get on.
Are we ok to clone off the github mirror?
Cheers
Richard
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:22 AM Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Tue, May
Hi,
Groot wrote on Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:58:34PM +0530:
> I tried updating all applications, only to be greeted with
> the following message.
You don't say so explicitly, but let's assume you upgraded to the
latest snapshot. While that is not the final 6.7 release yet,
the operating system
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:51:40AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote:
> > After some more work this morning we have managed to extract the
> > information from tcpdump of the full LS-Update packet, we couldn't see it
> > on bsd, but
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote:
> After some more work this morning we have managed to extract the
> information from tcpdump of the full LS-Update packet, we couldn't see it
> on bsd, but running:
>
> tcpdump -v -r ~/Downloads/ospf.pcap on osx did the trick.
>
>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Richard Chivers wrote:
> Another 5 or so seconds later the same LS-Update comes in with the same seq
> number. This appears to continue indefinitely. Our only fix appears to be
> restarting ospfd on the routers.
>
> Does anyone have an idea what is going
After some more work this morning we have managed to extract the
information from tcpdump of the full LS-Update packet, we couldn't see it
on bsd, but running:
tcpdump -v -r ~/Downloads/ospf.pcap on osx did the trick.
What we are seeing is that a pair of firewalls are both sending updates
like
17 matches
Mail list logo
