Am 04.04.22 08:22 schrieb Eric Thomas:
> I'd like to understand more about how OpenBSD logs internal events such as:
>
> - pkg_add/delete events
> - user logins
> - X session start/stops
> etc.
>
> Is there "one big log" where all of these types of events are stored?
> Or are they logged in
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 08:37:57PM +0100, Steve Fairhead said:
> To put it another way, what is the recommended way of upgrading a production
> system with patches applied (so -stable)?
Historically I used the manual method to upgrade releases but have been using
sysupgrade(8) since it became The
Very valuable insights. That’s a great idea.
The rysnc script was ksh/bash or cron? Ideally I’d like to use Python to tackle
something like this but I’m not against learning shell.
> On Apr 4, 2022, at 2:02 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> On 4/4/22 11:32 AM, Eric Thomas wrote:
>> I want to
imho benchmarking only makes sense for your scenario, so I recommend
benchmarking the ruleset you intend to use on that device.
Also: what are you benchmarking against, and what is your setup (nat,
bridge etc.)?
On 04.04.22 21:50, Nicolas Goy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to make some 10gbit/s
On 2022/04/04 20:37, Steve Fairhead wrote:
> On 04/04/2022 13:10, owner-m...@openbsd.org wrote:
> > sysupgrade only copes with what look like release versions (no version
> > suffix, upgrades to release+0.1 with no arguments, or snapshot with -s)
> > or snapshots (-current or -beta suffix, by
On 4/4/22 11:32 AM, Eric Thomas wrote:
I want to have a high degree of confidence in my system's state
(packages that have been added, configs that have changed, permissions
changed, etc). I've read about "read only filesystems" and the
pro's/con's
Hello,
I'd like to make some 10gbit/s benchmarks for an OpenBSD based router.
I was wondering if there was some "standard" pf ruleset I could use to
have a meaningful metric.
Also, I'm curious if anymody is aware of such existing benchmarks.
Regards
--
Nicolas Goy
https://www.kuon.ch
On 04/04/2022 13:10, owner-m...@openbsd.org wrote:
sysupgrade only copes with what look like release versions (no version
suffix, upgrades to release+0.1 with no arguments, or snapshot with -s)
or snapshots (-current or -beta suffix, by default -current upgrades
to release+0.1 or -beta upgrades
Hi,
I am using the vmctl application on a 7.0 stable host with a -current
guest. The guest was busy building some port. During this build on the
guest I started another build on the host. I was following the build of
the guest using vmctl console. After this I noticed a couple of times
that
Am 04.04.22 08:32 schrieb Eric Thomas:
> I want to have a high degree of confidence in my system's state
> (packages that have been added, configs that have changed, permissions
> changed, etc). I've read about "read only filesystems" and the
> pro's/con's
On 2022-04-04, Eric Thomas wrote:
> I'd like to understand more about how OpenBSD logs internal events such as:
>
> - pkg_add/delete events
> - user logins
> - X session start/stops
> etc.
>
> Is there "one big log" where all of these types of events are stored?
> Or are they logged in specific
On 2022-04-04, Eric Thomas wrote:
> I want to have a high degree of confidence in my system's state
> (packages that have been added, configs that have changed, permissions
> changed, etc). I've read about "read only filesystems" and the
> pro's/con's
Am Mo., 4. Apr. 2022 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Ian Darwin :
> Yes, in fact, *everyone* else is. /etc/changelist lists files that are
> monitored.
> You will get an email if they change, e.g., if a program surprisingly becomes
> setuid.
>
> I imagine that this is documented someplace.
man security
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 08:32:01AM -0700, Eric Thomas wrote:
> I want to have a high degree of confidence in my system's state
> (packages that have been added, configs that have changed, permissions
> changed, etc). I've read about "read only filesystems" and the
> pro's/con's
I want to have a high degree of confidence in my system's state
(packages that have been added, configs that have changed, permissions
changed, etc). I've read about "read only filesystems" and the
pro's/con's [here](http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/no_changes.htm).
Aside from that, is
I'd like to understand more about how OpenBSD logs internal events such as:
- pkg_add/delete events
- user logins
- X session start/stops
etc.
Is there "one big log" where all of these types of events are stored?
Or are they logged in specific directories depending on log type?
Which log
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:07:49PM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Escaño said:
> I'm trying to develop web apps on OpenBSD but Github and even Bitbucket
> seems to think that only Windows and/or Linux are the platforms so I feel
> forced to use VS Code that runs only on those systems.
git(1) works just
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:53:56AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm happily running several OpenBGPd routers (Openbsd 7.0).
>
> After having applied the folloxing filters (to blackhole traffic from
> certain countries):
>
> include "/etc/bgpd/deny-asn.ru.bgpd"
> include
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:14:35PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
>
> Le 01/04/2022 à 14:38, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
> >
> > The numbers look reasonable with maybe the exception of prefix and BGP
> > path attrs. Unless this system is pushing or pulling lots of full feeds to
> > peers I would not
Le 01/04/2022 à 14:38, Claudio Jeker a écrit :
The numbers look reasonable with maybe the exception of prefix and BGP
path attrs. Unless this system is pushing or pulling lots of full feeds to
peers I would not expect such a high number of prefixes. Also the number
of path attributes is high
Le 29/03/2022 à 14:50, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
Also: check the values for bgpd's login class (as root, "su -c bgpd -"
then "ulimit -a"), and are you starting bgpd from the rc-script or by hand?
Hi Stuart,
# ulimit -a
time(cpu-seconds) unlimited
file(blocks) unlimited
Le Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 08:23:35PM +1000, David Gwynne a écrit :
>
>
> > On 3 Apr 2022, at 21:46, Denis Fondras wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In vxlan(4) manual, we have :
> >
> > endpoint mode
> > When configured without a tunnel destination address, vxlan operates as
> > a bridge,
> On 3 Apr 2022, at 21:46, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In vxlan(4) manual, we have :
>
> endpoint mode
> When configured without a tunnel destination address, vxlan operates as
> a bridge, but with learning disabled.
>
>
> The question is : is it possible to set
On 2022-04-03, Nick Holland wrote:
> If you are going to find your data, you need to recreate the disklabel
> partitions exactly as they were on the encrypted FFS from OpenBSD.
> scan_ffs(8) may help.
OoenBSD's scan_ffs only supports FFS1, the OS defaults to FFS2.
Am 11.09.16 12:45 schrieb jean-francois:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm moving to OpenBSD for primary use, I'll have to keep a Windows OS for
> some specific purposes also.
>
> Just thanks for the development of OpenBSD, it's very easy to use since
> logical and well documented, I've been enjoying it for the
Am 02.04.22 18:56 schrieb harold:
> Hello,
>
> Today I take a little breath to try to get some help about a little problem
> I have since weeks.
> I lost data due to misunderstanding of formatting rdsc1 softraid partition
> on openbsd.
>
> I tell you my little story in the attached document,
26 matches
Mail list logo
