On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Guido Tschakert
guido.tschak...@src-gmbh.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2012 09:42, schrieb C. L. Martinez:
Hi all,
I am trying to do some tests with OpenBSD 5.1 and FreeBSD 9.1 beta in
my laptop virtual lab based on vmware workstation 8. But I have found
a
Hello all,
I went and bought a netgear WG311 PCI 54g (Wg311GE) card the other day
to put in my firewall. I intended to use this is as an access point for
a WLAN. This card is listed in the support hardware section on the
openbsd website under i386 but not amd64.
Anyways, I grabbed the
Hello all,
can anyone tell me if running 'ath' based cards in hostap mode is
reliable and stable ? I'm deciding whether to get a linksys wrt54g or to
throw an ath based card in my firewall and run it as the AP.
Also, does anyone know if I can run carp on wireless cards ?
Specifically, I
stan wrote:
Is there a way to do soemthing like ntpq -p with OpenBSD's OpenNTPD? I
really just want a quick way to assure myself that a given machine is in
synch.
No, but you can send us some code
Only joking ;-)
I'd like that option also.
Hello all,
Not sure if I'm missing something here with spamd so I thought I'd ask
the experts. I have it setup with the default config file (snipped) ;
[fw1]# cat /etc/spamd.conf
all:\
:spamhaus:china:korea:
# Mirrored from http://spfilter.openrbl.org/data/sbl/SBL.cidr.bz2
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
I also have the relevant pf rule in place;
[firewall]# pfctl -vsn
rdr inet proto tcp from spamd to any port = smtp - 127.0.0.1 port 8025
[ Evaluations: 104628Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0
]
[ Inserted: uid
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Brian McKerr wrote:
You mean a basic SMTP pass in ?
This has been allowing mail to the mailserver for years, its only this
week that I tried the Spamd thingo
pfctl -sr | grep -i smtp
pass in log quick on fxp0 proto tcp from any to any port
Steve Tornio wrote:
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',`Rejected - see
http://spamhaus.org/')dnl
Jun 17 19:49:29 inetmail sendmail[13126]: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=[210.213.176.247], arg2=127.0.0.4,
Steve Tornio wrote:
Because those addresses are in the XBL, not the SBL. The XBL is
populated by entries from the CBL, which are added when virus-like or
worm-like behavior is detected, and entries are removed at the first
request. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to try to create a
The man page says;
If the pass modifier is given, packets matching the translation rule
are passed without inspecting the filter rules:
I like this as it will reduce the size of my rules file, however, how
can I rdr pass and have it honour (for want of a better word) altq ?
Cheers,
I am thinking of getting one (or two) of these for my new firewall, just
curious if nayone has any opinions on its suitability in such a role.
Spec as follows;
64bit 360mhz CPU (IIi)
128mb RAM
1 x 18gb 10krpm
2 x integrated NIC
1x PCI (which I intend to put a dual port compaq/intel NIC in)
11 matches
Mail list logo
