Ariane van der Steldt [ari...@stack.nl] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:42:43PM +0200, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
After upgrading my AMD64-current installation to the latest snapshot it
crashes on boot with an uvm_fault.
Message:
starting network
uvm_fault(0xfe807f4032a0,
Mo Libden [m0lib...@mail.ru] wrote:
now this is intriguing.
AFAIK, classical vfork was invented in earlier BSD to avoid expensive
duplication of a parent process in case all the child does is launch of
other executable. SysV solved it with CoW, BSD came up with vfork.
Now, how come
Scott McEachern [sc...@blackstaff.ca] wrote:
On 02/29/12 03:52, Remco wrote:
If the file on your file system is
/var/nginx/html/who_is_online.php, a daemon chrooted to /var/nginx
will see it as /html/who_is_online.php. If the daemon chrooted to
/var/nginx should really see
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
I'm very careful with what I let the almost constantly full of exploits
phone have access to (a network being as strong as it's weakest link).
There were rumors in the last 20 years of firmware being loaded on phones to
provide an anonymous,
Benny Lofgren [bl-li...@lofgren.biz] wrote:
(For example, I'd love to see Jeff Robertson's and Kirk McKusick's
work on soft update journaling that went into FreeBSD 9 in OpenBSD
as well. Had I the time I'd look into it myself (it's a *lot* of work
from what little I've seen of it, but no
Jason McIntyre [j...@cava.myzen.co.uk] wrote:
right. but is there any reason to discourage people from running it when
they please, or do we just expect it to be done automatically after
upgrade?
i ask because we need to watch how we word this. we could reasonably
assume that people would
Geoff Steckel [g...@oat.com] wrote:
I didn't follow the thread all the way back, so forgive me if this has
been covered. I'm betting that the disk subsystem RAID controller
combination are choking on queued metadata writes. Some of the questions
are aimed at the user, and some at people who
RAID controller?
and I'd be better off just attaching separate disks and doing softraid.
If I cat the 10GB file to /dev/null and perform the same type of
operations, everything is as quick as you'd expect.
On 10 Jan 2012, at 17:48, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
George Steel [li
Ted Unangst [t...@tedunangst.com] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
There's also an issue with dirty buffers getting eaten up, but that is
prominent on slow devices, and you'd be WAITing in buf_needva in that case.
I don't think needva has been totally ruled out from
George Steel [li...@netglue.co] wrote:
When writing to the disk(s), the whole system becomes incredibly slow
until the write operation has finished. I've used dd to make 10GB files
and then timed simple operations like ls and compared this to other
OpenBSD servers I've got with single SATA
how about this scenario:
1. tar cvf /tmp/etc.tar /etc
2. mount_mfs -s 20M swap /etc
3. tar xvf /tmp/etc.tar -C /
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
scenario:
=
* mkdir /proto_etc
* cp -Rp /etc/* /proto_etc
* mkdir /pre_etc
* cd /pre_etc
* for i in boot.conf rc ttys passwd
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
On this type of system I just do rw;vi /whatever;ro where rw/ro are simple
shell scripts that run mount -uw / and mount -ur / respectively, I don't
usually find this a problem.
Or you could use a wrapper which does similar and commits the
It anyone wants to go right to Lemote and start selling on Amazon or direct in
your area, they were priced at $280/ea in 10 qty about 2 years ago.
So they're probably much cheaper now. And it sounds like they ship in single
qty now, too.
Johan Beisser [j...@caustic.org] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27,
Otto Moerbeek [o...@drijf.net] wrote:
There are several way to speedup fsck which are available now:
- Use larger block and fragment sizes when doing a newfs, of course
this requires rebuilding the file system
Is there any sort of rule-of-thumb for this now that 1TB drives are cheap and
2
OpenBSD has its own mechanism to mitigate high interrupt load that is already
enabled in the bge and em drivers.
Neither bge nor em are 10G cards.
??? [chipits...@gmail.com] wrote:
am I right that OpenBSD does NOT use device polling like FreeBSD or
Linux (called NAPI) do ?
any
some of these usb sticks come with a piece of software that will set them back
to being normal usb sticks without hidden cdroms
j...@bitminer.ca [j...@bitminer.ca] wrote:
I have an Iomega Prestige 1TB disk, USB 3.0 up to 5Gbit/s,
OpenBSD 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #794: Wed Mar 2 07:19:02 MST 2011
Upgrade to OpenBSD 5.0 before you dig too far. If you still have problems after
that, consider swapping hardware to see if the problems go away.
co...@tetrachina.com [co...@tetrachina.com] wrote:
Hi,
OpenBSD 4.1 as firewall crashed sometimes recently everyday ,and the
debug messages
John Tate [j...@johntate.org] wrote:
I think I've found a bug in the OpenBSD crowd. They bug the hell out of me
and my little mistakes.
Hi John,
It's actually spelled narcissism.
Chris
John Tate [j...@johntate.org] wrote:
I think I've found a bug in the OpenBSD crowd. They bug the hell out of me
and my little mistakes.
You also think facebook is narcissistic because...no negativity is allowed.
http://johntate.org/node/29
Perhaps it's time for the aspiring
Remco [re...@d-compu.dyndns.org] wrote:
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
here is the key error message. it means your whole ahci disk has
disappeared (and anything you can still run is happening from cache.)
--
ahci0: stopping the port, softreset slot 31 was still active.
ahci0: failed
here is the key error message. it means your whole ahci disk has disappeared
(and anything you can still run is happening from cache.)
--
ahci0: stopping the port, softreset slot 31 was still active.
ahci0: failed to reset port during timeout handling, disabling it
--
likely a reboot will fix
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE [soek...@cdl.asgaard.org] wrote:
Greetings,
Any thoughts as to how to get around this - it's only been up for a few
days. Rebooting my home router every 24 hours is not spouse endearing
behavior :)
port over some workarounds from dragonfly, or just figure
Manuel Ravasio [manuelrava...@yahoo.com] wrote:
Chris,
why would you suggest unbound instead of bind?
Which advantages do you
see?
unbound is very fast, will automatically relookup expired entries and has less
weird/odd issues like keeping a negative cache entry for hours or even days.
its
fRANz [andrea.francesc...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
what about unbound vs dnscache?!
Any document related?
unbound is very fast and plays well with misbehaving servers and poorly
implemented zone data
dnscache (the last time i tried it using it on a large scale) could not resolve
certain
Good alternative: OpenBSD + unbound
hvom .org [hvom@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi
DNS Google NS 1 : 8.8.8.8NS 2 : 8.8.4.4
Good alternative or Bad alternative ?
Best regards
--
There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering;
all the rest are merely games.
unless there is some special trick for 82571 that isn't necessary for newer
chips,
if (sc-hw.mac_type em_82572)
...
Jussi Peltola [pe...@pelzi.net] wrote:
You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :)
I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed.
This
yes you have to go to -current ports if you want php-fpm
keith [ke...@scott-land.net] wrote:
Was planning on setting php-fpm up today on a new OpenBSD 5.0 box
but can't find php-fpm. I though it was built in to php from version
5.3.3 onwards but it doesn't seem to be. I am trying to setup a
Marco would want term.xxx maybe
bofh [goodb...@gmail.com] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:36 AM, rancor theran...@gmail.com wrote:
Lol, what a scam! We got calls with the same context in Sweden as well.
There's one for .xxx as well. I can see it now, RED HAWT OSes just
waiting for
5.0 may be able to do this or close to it as long as you aren't load up lots of
pf rules (perhaps, leave pf off entirely)
the intel or broadcom gig nics should both be in the game here.
tx [zzw...@gmail.com] wrote:
Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between
several 1GBE
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, tx zzw...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between several 1GBE
links) with standard x86 CPU such as Xeon or Opteron and accelerated NICs
like Intel PRO1000/PT? All with
Time to upgrade to 5.0. Report any failures after you do that.
Leon Me?ner [l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.de] wrote:
Hi all,
we are running a backup firewall machine which regularly freezes since
OpenBSD 4.6. The configuration also changed at this time. When frozen no
input is accepted by
Christiano F. Haesbaert [haesba...@haesbaert.org] wrote:
On 17 October 2011 16:26, James Shupe jsh...@osre.org wrote:
Has anybody successfully installed and tested OpenBSD on a Routerboard
450G? I searched the archive for a dmesg and/ or confirmation, but
couldn't find a definitive answer.
Tito Mari Francis Esca??o [titomarifran...@gmail.com] wrote:
Dennis Ritchie should be the patron saint of software development and
engineering. :)
wouldn't that be fred brooks?
VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO [vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br] wrote:
After messing around with boot -c I was able to get it working
by disabling acpi, apm and mpbios. Hope this helps someone, since
I didn't find anything about this error on the OpenBSD archives...
Nvidia HW is quite too much crappy.
somebody actually wrote their own open source replacement for the frontpage
CGIs sometime, that might be worth a look. i'm sure you can find it searching
around.
or, you can replace mod_frontpage with suexec, a small wrapper that you get to
compile, and mod_rewrite rules. you still have to
Alec Taylor [alec.tayl...@gmail.com] wrote:
What's the project?
I know about ~1000 open-source projects, so if you tell me the task it
solves, I can give you a couple of open-source projects which
implement the required feature-set.
yes, and in fact you can find many open source projects
Carlos A. Garcia G. [samu...@loscabos.gob.mx] wrote:
On 09/09/11 10:12, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
somebody actually wrote their own open source replacement for the frontpage
CGIs sometime, that might be worth a look. i'm sure you can find it
searching around.
or, you can replace
This is a port, not part of the OpenBSD base system. You should take this up
with the port maintainer and the author of smtp-vilter.
Aaron Jackson [jack...@msrce.howard.edu] wrote:
Irene killed my firewall/web server/mail sever, so I'm in the process of
recreating its setup with the current
martian67 [martia...@gmail.com] wrote:
It is extremely clear, no non-ISC licensed/similarly licensed
software will be imported into base. Peroid.
I don't know about that. Quite a bit of GPL software is now being incorporated
into the base tree. In fact, Theo is almost finished importing
i386 port has access to 32-bit (4 GB) address space but only allows you to use
up to 3 GB of RAM at most, the last 1 GB of address space is used for
addressing devices, and as others are saying here, video card shared mem also
eats up space 4 GB
openbsd didn't bother with PAE on i386, it's too
James A. Peltier [jpelt...@sfu.ca] wrote:
I think there is an issue with Broadcom cards and VLANs IIRC. On the Dell
R200 I have the integrated bge drivers do not seem to support VLANs, other
cards might not have issues but YMMV.
This isn't supposed to be broken, get the device ID of your
jakemsr sent this which fixed the problem on 6SERIES and is documented on
datasheets of these other chipsets as well:
Index: azalia.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/azalia.c,v
retrieving revision 1.198
diff -u -r1.198 azalia.c
patrick keshishian [pkesh...@gmail.com] wrote:
That's what I was wondering. Is this not considered distribution?
(realizing I might be poking at a hornet's nest).
Stop distributing illegal firmware you pirate
Lennart Poettering has graced the world with his brilliance one more time.
Why? Lennart doesn't think BSD is too relevant anymore.
http://linuxfr.org/nodes/86687/comments/1249943
Lennart is the brains behind highly relevant software such as PulseAudio,
widely known as the broken audio system
Nico Kadel-Garcia [nka...@gmail.com] wrote:
Don't mistake OpenSSH for OpenBSD. The early history is fascinating.
http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/ssh/ch01_05.htm
(I was involved in very early SunOS ports of ssh-1 and ssh-2, before
OpenSSH existed.)
Most of the early
MG [mas...@fourseasonsnow.com] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but does this mean that if I were to install
OpenBSD 4.9 via FTP today, there shouldn't be random IPsec
disconnects as described in bug PR6601? Thanks.
Only if it's 4.9-current (snapshot)
If you install 4.9 release, you have to
STeve Andre' [and...@msu.edu] wrote:
On 07/07/11 15:12, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
The developers don't adopt new things just because they're new.
If something isn't reasonable, useful and secure it isn't used. This
is one reason why each new release of OpenBSD doesn't have the
currently released
Jeff Ross [jr...@openvistas.net] wrote:
This hang happens with the 4 different SuperMicro based motherboards
I have that have the lm chipset.
In the second message referenced above I noted that a snapshot dated
May 25 booted normally and I first ran into the problem on June 6 so
the
Tobias Ulmer [tobi...@tmux.org] wrote:
Here is something to read: http://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/
I never knew cat -v was an option. Amazing! That was one of the most useful
features in cat and I've never even seen it before! Now if only I could find
something to use with tn3270
--
the
Dajka Tamas [dajka.ta...@upc.hu] wrote:
Assigning one of the phys devices as vlandev to a vlan is not working. I
mean, I can assign to them, but if vlan40 is assigned to hme2 and hme2
failes, than vlan40 will be down and hosts in vlan40 are unreacheable.
So:
ifconfig hme2 up
ifconfig
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
there hasn't been support for any newer bus-based accelerators
added recently (overheads for these are typically rather high).
currently if you want fast AES, you should be looking at the
newer intel cpus with AESNI (and OpenBSD 4.9 or newer),
This is some kind of BIOS boot-up support
The chips on this board are run-of-the-mill em
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #32: Sat Apr 23 18:16:16 PDT 2011
ch...@celery.ykwc.com:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8580038656 (8182MB)
avail mem = 8337596416 (7951MB)
mainbus0
Brad DeMorrow [bdemor...@gmail.com] wrote:
Below is my dmesg, please let me know if there is any other
information I could provide that would be useful.
PS: It looks like my dmesg is also indicating an issue with wpi
firmware as well - although I haven't had any problems using it.
as a
looks like a setup bug in the non-attachment of inteldrm?
try disabling inteldrm in the UKC
(boot -c
disable inteldrm
quit)
Ivo Chutkin [open...@bgone.net] wrote:
Hello sirs,
I have problem to get this system running.
It is Supermicro P8SCi, dmesg and panic messages are below.
I have three
Rodrigo Mosconi [open...@mosconi.mat.br] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested on some benchmarks, specially with network/PF.
How about this...With GENERIC -current amd64 kernel, I'm getting almost 800Mbps
on a single FTP transfer between two 1Gbit-connected boxes with em controllers
and mfi RAID
Amit Kulkarni [amitk...@gmail.com] wrote:
Chris, don't forget to mention that they are simplifying the buffer cache
(and bigmem!) so that when the attempted switch to rthreads comes, there will
be far less hassles
compared to FreeBSD or NetBSD, which literally took 2-5 years to perfect.
The new official amd64 limit is 1GB.
Bryan [bra...@gmail.com] wrote:
So, now that BIGMEM is up, what is the new max? are we talking TB?
or is 8GB the new upper limit?
Ryan McBride [mcbr...@openbsd.org] wrote:
Are you suggesting that because you have a quad-port gig nic, your box
should be able to do 6 *million* packets per second? By that logic my
5-port Soekris net4801 should be able to handle 740kpps. (for reference,
the net4801 does about 3kpps with
it requires driver modifications for all 802.11n supporting chips, and
ieee80211 infrastructure update to add support for new modulation rates other
new 11n techniques that are tied into the stack
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera [h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar] wrote:
I know that 802.11n is not supported
the alternative is UPnP, which you'd need a supporting daemon to add port
mappings into pf to support with an obsd gateway
Josh Smith [juice...@gmail.com] wrote:
misc@,
I recently acquired a playstation 3 and have been running into some
difficulties playing it online behing my openbsd
Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever
variable you are seeing a graph spike. It should be fairly easy for
them to fix if you report it. The fact that it affects 64bit and not
32bit counters is a damn good clue.
Graph spike happens every time pf is reload
nsd is already part of the tree and unbound will join it at some point to
replace bind. they are well documented, fairly easy to use, and unbound is
available through ports. use it.
Josh Smith [juice...@gmail.com] wrote:
Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named
-v
That link (and this thread) read like the blind leading the blind.
Enabling RTS/CTS with packet sizes above 1500 is probably not what is fixing
his problem
And changing the mtu has nothing to do with any of this.
If enabling RTS fixes problems, then using a cleaner frequency should do the
Jeremy Chase [jeremych...@gmail.com] wrote:
This is my not-so-technical understanding.
OpenBSD's current SMP status:
- The kernel uses a single lock for shared data. My understanding is
that this means that the kernel itself doesn't benefit from SMP as
much as it could otherwise, but it
The AR9271 is in one interesting product that retails for $30 USD: Ubiquiti
WifiStation - a USB dongle with 7dBi dual-chain directional antenna and 30dBm
(1 watt) tx power (also comes in an external-antenna 1 watt version)
Damien Bergamini [damien.bergam...@free.fr] wrote:
otus(4) only
Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
That is good to know, meaning, something else is broken:
# bioctl -R sd0a sd2
bioctl: Target sd0a: target not specified
Would it be interesting to investigate what's on the devices
or should I just re-create the whole thing from scratch?
I ran into
Are the partition sizes on sd0a/sd1a (I assume the are mirrored) the same?
What does disklabel show for the RAIDed disks?
Niels Poppe [n...@xs4all.nl] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
# bioctl -R sd0a sd2
You are aware that US customs is regularly seizing laptop hard drives of people
who enter the US, copying them, and returning them at a future date? This was
challenged in court and naturally the government won their case.
This is such a problem that some companies are mailing hard drives,
Not supported
Jean-Francois [jfsimon1...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem starting X and in Xorg.0.log there is the following lines.
Is
it a driver error ? It's an integrated graphic card on the MB providing both
vesa/hdmi outputs. Could you please help ?
(II) VESA: driver
Martin Pelik??n [martin.peli...@gmail.com] wrote:
2010/9/10, Andy Bradford
amb-sendok-1286721307.iadidoklmfcciicnc...@bradfords.org:
Why would you need 65k UDP for DNS? Almost all UDP based DNS responses
are under 512 bytes, those that are larger are required to set the
truncated
Martin Pelik??n [martin.peli...@gmail.com] wrote:
2010/9/10, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net:
Stop using ALTQ on your DNS server, perhaps? That may be what is causing
the back-pressure that you're seeing.
Why do you think it would help? Those lots of packets would arrive
anyway, only
this is likely to be a result of a corrupted filesstem...
reboot in single user mode, bsd -s at the boot prompt, and run fsck -fy all of
your filesystems
Federico Giannici [giann...@neomedia.it] wrote:
A panic occurred to one of our servers. I never experienced this
panic before, but I have
Benny L??fgren [bl-li...@lofgren.biz] wrote:
(I've long wished for a privsep apache with separate chroot():s for
every virtual domain... one of these days I'm gonna have to look
into it, but I suppose it's not trivial to implement or someone
would have done it by now. :-) )
I think
OpenBSD dhcpd can run without any arguments at all, it will simply look at what
LANs are in your dhcpd.conf and if any of them match to active interfaces, it
will listen on those interfaces. it's pure magic
Allie Daneman [...@drainfade.com] wrote:
Hmmm...I run my dhcpd alittle different (2
Kevin Chadwick [ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
One thing which is debateable for hours is smtp connections and verps
which is why an rfc can't be decided upon (performance (for spammers
too) vs functionality). qmail has taught other MTAs far more than any
other MTA has taught qmail.
That's
Considering that 4.7 isn't known to have major, show-stopper bugs in PF like
you experience, you may want to consider that there is a bug in some other part
of the system like the ethernet driver or some such.
If you can try 4.8 snapshots first, and perhaps post your tests, results, and
dmesg
he says NAT, so what about something like match out from 192.168.0.0/16 to any
nat-to 35.42.1.42
pf.conf and the faq should have plenty more info
Johan Beisser [...@caustic.org] wrote:
pass all
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Peter Merritt pwmerr...@weirdwater.org
wrote:
What would be
Martin Pelik??n [martin.peli...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hello everyone.
I have a AP with AR5413 with RouterOS and several OpenBSD clients. IBM
notebooks using ath(4), iwi(4) and rum(4) work perfectly. The problem
...
Does anyone have a clue what could cause such weird behavior for CM9's?
I know
...@yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:59:00 -0700
Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
I continue to kill R/W flash (last year, I killed a brand new SuperTalent
server-class SLC SSD after 1 month of use, testing some huge and scary Java
NMS app, jffnms or something like that. This app
FWIW, with whatever older chips I've tested with, the interrupt mitigation on
the bge driver seems to be configured a bit more aggressive than on em..I see
interrupt counts from bge that are 1/2 to 1/4th the count vs em for the same
traffic. Both drivers support a broad range of features like
tarom...@gmail.com [tarom...@gmail.com] wrote:
This is a really interesting thread.
From my novice perspective, I wonder if the interrupt load actually makes a
difference on the performance of OpenBGPd on different hardware as bge or em.
A higher interrupt load makes the CPU busy running
Peter Bako [pe...@bakonet.org] wrote:
(http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/embedded/)
Doing this by hand is strange. It's only worth doing if you already understand
what you're doing (and you have a specific need) or if you want to spend a bit
of time learning.
This guide and various others
Please describe slowness in more detail. Where does it occur? What is
happening? etc...
You can disable amdiic at the UKC prompt. this thing is an amd64 right?
boot bsd -c
UKC diable amdiic
UKC quit
Beavis [pfu...@gmail.com] wrote:
Greetings to All,
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6 as a
Daniel Barowy [dbar...@barowy.net] wrote:
The problem is that we're copying the entire disk, so, as far as the
disk (i.e., SSDs) is aware, that disk is 100% full-- all blocks are
To make your deployment faster, just use fdisk, disklabel, newfs to setup the
disk and tar to copy the files.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:52:58PM -0400, Daniel Barowy wrote:
The reality is that our novice administrators rarely do any real
server deployment-- it's really just me and another guy-- so when it
comes down to it, this is just a time-saving measure for us. The
genesis of it was from doing
Aaron Mason [simplersolut...@gmail.com] wrote:
Firstly, the scanning issue. The CM9 is an industrial card designed
for use in wireless links and in IBSS networks. They don't have the
ability to search for other access points - they're meant to BE an
access point.
Bullshit. It's just an
Joe Gidi [...@entropicblur.com] wrote:
Does this mean that amd64 can now handle 4G of RAM, or is that a separate
issue?
Separate issue
But if you have an iommu device and you set bigmem=1 then it might work for you
This system is definitely too old for AHCI to be a chipset option.
You could always add in a cheap SATA card with Silicon Image chip, the sili
driver supports NCQ...
1-3MB/sec isn't near the max speed of any of your hardware, and you fail to
mention what you are doing while iostat is running
Shailesh Tyagi [shail...@novanet.net] wrote:
As soon as we start traffic bgp server starts behaving strangely. for example
if we ping any IP, customer side or towards upstream from the bgpd server,
first few seconds we get no route to host and after few seconds it starts
getting the response.
This may or may not be the same problem, but...
I had a usb flash adaptor that would randomly error out with strange errors
that would be different from time to time. I threw it away and my next usb
flash adaptor did the same thing. Eventually I looked at it closer and
realized that the usb
You're using diskd but you didn't increase the sysv shared memory sizes. The
squid processes used sysv shared memory to talk to diskd.
There used to be some file with the squid port that told you what sizes to use
for the sysv sysctls. Maybe the sysv shared memory defaults were increased to
Janne Johansson [...@it.su.se] wrote:
I move money from my account into paypal, with the intention of those
money may disappear from the face of the earth, then make PP donations
using those. No ties to any account or CC for me, so I dont risk
anything except what I give to PP in the first
amanda is so last-century
what about rsnapshot or boxbackup ?
stan [st...@panix.com] wrote:
I am in the process of upgrading various older OpenBSD machines to 4.5. As
a part of this I am upgrading the Amanda clients on them.
I have discoverd that (at least on 4,5) somewhere between Amanda
Assuming the Areca controller's virtual disk shows up as sd0, you can reinstall
the MBR and boot blocks by:
1. Boot bsd.rd (from CD perhaps?)
2. fdisk -i sd0 (MBR)
3. mount /dev/sd0a to /mnt
4. installboot /mnt/boot /usr/mdec/biosboot sd0 (Boot blocks)
Of course, I'm assuming here that your
So, what are you asking for?
For OpenBSD to adopt the Mac OS X mbuf interface (or KPI)?
What is the deficiency in the OpenBSD mbuf interface that you see?
What function do you need? For what application?
Most of the Mac OS X mbuf KPI is the same as the OpenBSD mbuf interface, just
with
Hi,
It's my birthday, so I decided to release a little rewrite of flashdist that
I've been working on.
It addresses the two major shortcomings of flashdist (in light of the fact that
an 8GB usb key costs $20 now)
First, it installs a _complete_ OpenBSD system, that runs in read-only (or
Have you tried different disks? The AHCI driver works really well with AHCI
1.1 and AHCI 1.2 on intel chipsets, at least in my experience.
Mihai Popescu B.S. [mihai...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hello,
I have a DELL Precision 370 workstation and BIOS allows me to select
the SATA behaviour mode: it
yes
Anathae Townsend [atowns...@nucleus.com] wrote:
the following pf.conf fragment allows ssh connections from the outside world
to my firewall
pass in on egress proto tcp from any to egress port ssh keep state \
(max-src-conn 10, max-src-conn-rate 4/20, overload brutes flush global)
w...@xoono.net [w...@xoono.net] wrote:
pciide0 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 Acer Labs M5219 UDMA IDE rev 0x20: DMA
(unsupported), channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1
configured to compatibility
pciide0: channel 0 ignored (other hardware responding at addresses)
pciide0: channel 1
I typically use the configuration files and asterisk command line.
Andres Salazar [ndrsslz...@gmail.com] wrote:
I would like to ask the OBSD community if someone can recommend me a good
supported interface for Asterisk on OBSD.
I have heard that FreePBX is really a pain to configure
501 - 600 of 720 matches
Mail list logo
