On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote:
> Hi every OpenBSD user,
> I have OpenBSD on my Notebook since 2 years ago and I don't want to
> switch
> other OS for my business pentest project.
> I need some pentest tools for my project like metasploit, fuzzers, ..etc
> but I
-current not currently building:
==
mandoc -Tlint -Wfatal /usr/src/usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5
cc -o ldapd ber.o log.o control.o util.o ldapd.o ldape.o conn.o
attributes.o namespace.o btree.o filter.o search.o parse.o auth.o
modify.o index.o ssl.o
Guess I'm missing the point, Downloaded src from scratch and now
getting a different error (on two separate systems) when trying to
build userland:
mandoc -Tlint -Wfatal /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpctl.8
=== usr.sbin/openssl
cc -O2 -pipe -DMONOLITH -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5
OK, I'll try again. I do follow the source changes via gmane with a
newsreader but I think there's a bit of delay.
Thanks.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 23:15, Chris Smith wrote:
Guess I'm missing the point, Downloaded src from
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Diana Eichert deich...@wrench.com wrote:
FWIW, Anyone who is responsible for border firewalls deplores FTP protocol.
And its cousin, FTPS, which, although encrypted, has the same dual
port problem yet not curable via a proxy.
Chris
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
You can uninstall the package if you don't need it, or you can keep it
if you do need it (for example, for drill or the ldns-* tools).
How about this line added to rc.conf.local when using the package:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
See the thread unbound dnssec revisited I started on 12/30/2013 for
some hints. Looks like creating a new directory with the proper
permissions is the best way to go.
Now fixed in -current with a /var/unbound/db
Great to see Unbound in base, thanks.
But what about ldns? I still have that installed as a package -
removed the unbound package as per the -current instructions, but
shouldn't the ldns package package be removed as well as I believe
unbound requires it and therefore it would have to be built by
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Kenneth Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
The unbound in base has it's own cut down version of ldns. No need for
the package.
Can I just uninstall the package after the fact or do some files need
to be replaced?
Thanks,
Chris
See the thread unbound dnssec revisited I started on 12/30/2013 for
some hints. Looks like creating a new directory with the proper
permissions is the best way to go.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Атанас Владимиров don.na...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for Off-topic, but when you enable
I think the source of this reported problem has been found, and
happily fixed (the preliminary results are promising).
Basically I needed to find some way to get the backups to complete
reliably so I started a 20 count ping job a minute before the rsync
job (actually an rsnapshot job which
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This could be an MTU or RWIN-related issue.
Could my issue have anything to with the miscounting bug for inbound
with pf on mentioned in the following commit?
CVSROOT:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
have moved the block all to the beginning of the ruleset to see if
it will make any difference
Unfortunately no difference. The attempt to rsync the first directory
failed last night, second one worked fine.
Any
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Charles RAPENNE char...@bsd.zplay.euwrote:
Do you rsync directly to an ip address or are you using avec domain name ?
Not DNS - directly to IP address.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Posting the firewall ruleset may possibly help people diagnose this in more
detail.
Here's some pertinent pf.conf info:
===
set skip on { lo enc0 }
set block-policy drop
set reassemble
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This could be an MTU or RWIN-related issue. One common problem is if the
firewall state is created from an already-established connection rather
than a SYN packet, in this case the firewall can't keep track of the
to troubleshoot this.
Chris
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
I'm having a problem connecting with (and through) one OpenBSD box.
Both ends are running OpenBSD -current (-current as of last weekend)
and I've had the issue through a couple of months
hope they come looking for me next...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/09/1267958/-Cartoon-Pufferfish-madness-in-Chagrin-nbsp-Falls?detail=hide
Chris
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Remi Locherer remi.loche...@relo.ch wrote:
Having the root.key in a separate directory works.
Yes, it works. But /var/unbound/etc was the choice during configure
which means
=== regress/gnu/egcs/gcc-builtins
/bin/sh: cd: /usr/src/regress/gnu/egcs/gcc-builtins - No such file or directory
*** Error 1 in regress/gnu/egcs (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'obj')
*** Error 1 in regress/gnu (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'obj')
*** Error 1 in regress (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'obj')
*** Error 1 in /usr/src
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
cd /usr/src/regress/gnu/egcs/
cvs up -dP
As usual, don't forget the -d.
Ah... thanks. Guess I need to add that -d to my .cvsrc file.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dennis Davis
dennisdavis+openbsd-m...@fastmail.fm wrote:
It's a while since I looked at this, so the exact details are hazy,
but is all this necessary?
snip
Doesn't seem to me that you need to run unbound-anchor as a part of
/etc/rc.d/unbound. You just need to
I've been working on using dnssec with the unbound package and viewing
some of the threads here on the list regarding this.
Enabling autotrust and the validator module in unbound.conf and
running unbound-anchor before starting unbound will enable dnssec but
eventually will log errors of:
could
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
And to strongly reiterate that it would be supper to have this product
in base
Er.. that it would be SUPER to have this product in base
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
More simply, can that file be moved to another location? Then we can
enable write permissions to /var/unbound/etc/autotrust/files/... or
something, without giving away the keys to the whole kingdom.
Actually that was close
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Remi Locherer remi.loche...@relo.ch wrote:
Having the root.key in a separate directory works.
Yes, it works. But /var/unbound/etc was the choice during configure
which means a little more work:
The autotrust path line in unbound.conf needs to be edited with the
I'm having a problem connecting with (and through) one OpenBSD box.
Both ends are running OpenBSD -current (-current as of last weekend)
and I've had the issue through a couple of months of various builds of
-current.
The problem occurs whether I'm connecting directly to the remote
OpenBSD box
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a real issue, due to errors I made replacing CIRCLEQ with TAILQ.
A fix is being worked on, and a workaround probably sooner than that.
Looks like the recent updates have resolved the issue. Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a real issue, due to errors I made replacing CIRCLEQ with TAILQ.
A fix is being worked on, and a workaround probably sooner than that.
Thanks. I knew it wasn't a userland/kernel sync problem.
Two systems running -current (x86_64) cannot run netstat:
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #3: Sat Dec 21 17:05:25 EST 2013
# netstat
Segmentation fault
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Alexey E. Suslikov
alexey.susli...@gmail.com wrote:
blind guess - you have kernel and userland out of sync.
Not so.
Yes, that does help it all make sense.
Thanks to all.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 22:16, Chris Smith wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org
wrote:
Dec 10 16:19:46 firewall dhcpd[29710
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
Malicious or confused. Or truncated packets. The log message
means that the option length as given in the packet would run
the option data outside the received packet. The confusion
might have started in an
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Dec 10 16:19:46 firewall dhcpd[29710]: Many bogus options seen in offers.
In particular the above line: Many bogus options seen in offers.
Doesn't the server make the offer? If so, why would the OpenBSD
dhcpd server
What might be the implications of the following messages in the log?
Dec 6 15:09:39 firewall dhcpd[29710]: option option-79 (119) larger
than buffer.
Dec 6 15:09:39 firewall dhcpd[29710]: rejecting bogus offer.
Dec 9 12:15:35 firewall dhcpd[29710]:
Turns out the problem was with the Internet Guide service. If the IP
address from which the query was sent was on the subscriber list then
the incorrect info was sent. That's why it worked from one of my
networks but not the others.
Thanks to all.
Chris
This falls under the category When in doubt, ask the OpenBSD guys
(and as all of my firewalls are running OpenBSD I hope this isn't too
off topic).
Basically, four of my networks are not getting an answer for a
specific mx query from dyn.com's DNS server. Yet every other DNS cache
I've queried
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net wrote:
but, say
$ dig @216.146.35.35 bsdly.net mx
works?
Or do you get no answer for any queries?
It's just that one particular query and the same domain's TXT record.
There may be others but this one was found because
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not know if it is the case, but many isp's today use dns
transparent proxying.
You can try using the site www.dnsleaktest.com to see if it is your
case.
The lwtitle.com mx and lwtitle.com txt queries
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Patrik Lundin
patrik.lundin@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity: If you are running unbound on the firewall, why
are you querying the troublesome resolver directly? Do you get the same
result when querying the local unbound?
Same results from Unbound.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Patrik Lundin
patrik.lundin@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if I'm missing something, but what lead you to suspect the
216.146.35.35 machine in the first place?
Some of my clients use that service and for them Unbound doesn't act
as a validator, just an iterator that
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
I just needed to do the same (smtpd would elect to use ipv6, but i only
have ipv4 spf records). The man page kind of says it's a table name, but
it's not. Try this instead:
accept from local for any relay source a.b.c.d
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
christop...@gmerlin.de wrote:
what's $alias1 in your pf.conf? Can't you paste just your whole
pf.conf? What do you mean by smtpip = $alias1.
You seem to do a on $alias1. so $alias1 seems to be an interface?
It's just a macro for one of
Hello,
Trying to use smtpd on a particular interface alias (for sending only,
not for listening) and am not finding a way to do so. It seems to
default sending out via the :0 address.
Chris
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking a look on the smtpd.conf(5) man page, there is the source
directive, which does what you are trying to accomplish.
Don't know what I'm doing wrong as I can't get it to work here.
Using these rules works
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
christop...@gmerlin.de wrote:
Now I'd be looking at 'route -n show -inet', 'ifconfig $ext_if' and
'ifconfig $alias1'
ifconfig doesn't understand pf macros (as far as i can tell)
==
# route
Mentioned previously:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since 5.3-ish
iirc).
Wondering if mongodb is operational with -current?
Thank you,
Chris
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
Running your own own DNS resolver is the best solution to deny the whole
network facebook access. With Unbound this is simple:
# This will block facebook.com and all subdomains.
local-zone: facebook.com redirect
don't want to bother with a whole Cyrus/Fetchmail/
IMAP/dovecot stack of turtles. It's too much pain to keep running.
Any help appreciated!
--
Chris Smith
*
*
/usr/bin/Mail - /usr/bin/mail
/usr/bin/mailx - /usr/bin/mail
=== usr.bin/make
install -c -S -s -o root -g bin -m 555 make /usr/bin/make
install -c -o root -g bin -m 444 /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.1
/usr/share/man/man1/make.1
=== usr.bin/man
make: unknown option -- P
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
So, don't run make -P...
OK, thanks.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
no
Thanks.
Any plans to implement this?
Updated -current recently which left my internal network unusable. The
system was forwarding packets but not doing NAT. Turns out the problem
was that the external interface, which is a dhcp assigned (via the
ISP) interface was no longer being assigned to the egress group. And
my NAT rule is:
Seems that pf can enforce a min-ttl but can it explicitly set the ttl
on packets leaving an interface?
Looking for a bit of clarification on match and nat-to. At one point
(and maybe still so?) nat rules were first matching as opposed to
the 'normal' case of last matching but match rules are sticky until
overridden.
With:
match out on $ext_if inet from !($ext_if) to any nat-to ($ext_if)
match out
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Marc Peters m...@mpeters.org wrote:
dhclient
I've noticed a lot of dhclient changes in cvs over the past few
weeks.You might try a newer snapshot.
Chris
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Mike Korbakov mike-...@yandex.ru wrote:
May be, your host system too old, and in -current system header files has
changed significantly.
Compare files in /usr/include/sys and /usr/src/sys/sys (check other headers
too)
Or download and install -current as host
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Is /usr/obj clean? Also, if you're building outside of make build
make sure you use make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper. I built the nsd update
successfully on amd64 i386 macppc and vax before I committed it and
there have
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
I use a .cvsrc file with:
=
cvs -q -danon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs
diff -up
update -Pd
checkout -P
=
I do not checkout the ports or xenocara trees
make
echo #include config.h zlexer.c
echo #include \configyyrename.h\ configlexer.c
/usr/bin/yacc -d -o configparser.c /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/configparser.y
flex -i -t /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/zlexer.lex zlexer.c
flex -i -t /usr/src/usr.sbin/nsd/configlexer.lex configlexer.c
/usr/bin/yacc -d -o
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
It seems your tree is not clean, the tsig_get_algorithm_by_id prototype
which it's complaining about was removed in tsig.h r1.1.1.3.
I re-ran cvs up which was clean (no changes) and did a make build
(after the other
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
It seems your tree is not clean, the tsig_get_algorithm_by_id prototype
which it's complaining about was removed in tsig.h r1.1.1.3.
I have plenty of tsig.h files:
===
locate tsig.h
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
$ cvs up -dAP
That didn't help :-(
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:56 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running 5.2. And starting to have more and more things that need
IP addresses pop in and out of the house. Rather than hardcoding
everything into dhcpd.conf, I thought I'd check with you guys to see
what you use to have new
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:59 AM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
I could not figure out which dhcp option(s) you are referring to. Please
specify option number and RFC number.
For options with names see:
dhcp-options(5) (beeing reworked currently)
/usr/src/usr.sbin/dhcpd/tables.c
Maybe it's a problem due to Unbound being a package and not part of
the core system, but a normal configuration such as:
host hostname.example.com {
hardware ethernet 00:1a:80:f4:75:ad;
fixed-address hostname.example.com;
}
has to be rewritten as:
host hostname.example.com {
hardware
That works fine. Thanks!
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops, the obj directory got added to cvs. It'll cause problems for
cvs up -d until we can verify that the mirrors won't be broken when
we remove it. For you, for now, the following steps
Trying to keep -current and am getting this message when doing a cvs up:
cvs [update aborted]: could not chdir to regress/misc/sse2/foo/obj/:
No such file or directory
It's there:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Not exactly, but you might be able to do something with this, *before*
your ftp-proxy rule:
pass out quick proto tcp to 0.0.0.0/0 port 8821 rdr-to 0.0.0.0/0 port 21
bitmask
Then if you tell your ftp client to
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Looks like skipping ftp-proxy for that target address works. Thanks!
Is there any way to make this work automagically for ftps?
Right now I'm doing this:
anchor ftp-proxy/*
pass in quick
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
If the control connection is encrypted as with ftp+tls, then ftp-proxy
*cannot* work, as it cannot read the commands. So, if this is with NAT,
you can't rely on ftp-proxy to fix things up, you will need ftp+tls
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar wrote:
Since you say this works with a standard home router, have you checked
if maybe the server software uses nat pmp or something similar for port
redirection?
I tested it with an Asus RT-AC66U with its UPnP
Having some issues with a client system attempting to use a product called
MoveItFreely to connect to server via FTPS (FTP with TLS). The firewall is
running a snapshot from April, 3 2011 of version 4.9.
I have added a pass rule for the additional (to port 21) requested ports of
989, 990, and
The Edge Router Lite looks to be a sweet box:
http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax
Dual-core MIPS64 processor with hardware acceleration for packet
processing and encryption/decryption.
Only 99 USD, wonder if OpenBSD can run on it and take advantage of the
hardware acceleration.
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Lars Hansson romaby...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm..I get This post could not be found.
Apparently the original post has been deleted by its author. His
prerogative, but I think it's in bad taste to create such history
gaps.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
The original post had nothing to do with OpenBSD, some nitwit hijacked
the comment thread. I don't think the author has any obligation to
play host to a battleground.
The original post was about IPv6, someone commented
... if you really want a firewall you need pfSense.
Also if you walk into any security experts convention and claim that
raw OpenBSD is a firewall, you will get laughed out of the room for
lack of clue.
Guess I've been wrong all these years: see the comments to
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Geoff Steckel g...@oat.com wrote:
Thanks very much! I think using NSD for the outward facing authoritative
service makes sense. Retaining BIND is probably best for the internal
service
since I see no way to add the local domains, etc. to unbound/nsd while
Running -current (updated 5/19/12) and saw these entries today:
=
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new addresses into table fxp1:0: 12
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new addresses into table fxp1:network: 12
pf: pfi_table_update: cannot set 1 new
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Geoff Steckel g...@oat.com wrote:
My site needs both split horizon and pretty complete authoritative support.
Does anyone have suggestions about BIND replacement(s) for this scenario?
NSD for authoritative and Unbound (both from NLnet Labs of Amsterdam)
for
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
I'll try and find time to properly review the diff to add it to
the system infrastructure (/etc/rc and /etc/rc.d parts etc) in the
next week or so. I am pretty confident in unbound itself but
the system integration
As unbound is now in base but not yet built by default how is it built
in order to test it (is it a simple 'make install' or is more
involved)? How to add it to the list the gets built with a make
build of userland (or is this even safe)? Or is it simply best to use
packages or ports at this time?
Would like to tunnel the net traffic from my (android) cell phone (and
tablet if I ever get one) through my soho OpenBSD firewall/router when
I'm connected to untrusted and/or open wifi. My outside/public IP is
not fixed (cable) but it rarely changes and I do have a ddns hostname.
Is this
the Internet returned nothing useful
unfortunately.
Best Regards,
Chris Smith
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, sc...@web.de wrote:
It is no discovery, I continously change the computer. Right now searching
for an old one that do not consume much electricity. The best is a Siemens
with a celeron, 800mhz, the whole machine consumes 32w when idle, but goes
to 42w or more
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
in the meantime, adding inet to the line is likely to help.
Indeed, thank you.
Having some issues with -current.
This line in pf.conf:
match out on $ext_if from my_net to any nat-to $ext_ad0
Generates the following error:
# pfctl -n -f /etc/pf.conf
/etc/pf.conf:41: af-to is not supported on match rules
/etc/pf.conf:41: skipping rule due to errors
/etc/pf.conf:41: rule
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Zantgo zan...@gmail.com wrote:
WTF? I use OpenBSD and hate the other operating systems
Don't listen to those posts - clearly you need the Windows 7 drivers
if you're running -current.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I don't actually need 4 NICs, I'm looking at the new Intel
S1200KP (mini-itx 1155 board with dual intel nics). I can put a g620t
and get the same power consumption rates as an atom d525, for the same
prices as the Soekris.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it happens when you start out. Look Nick added this because of you :-)
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110919
Thank you Nick :)
However, I just realized that:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
The site at http://openbsd.org is not in sync with http://www.openbsd.org/.
yes they are different. its addressed already in the archives multiple times.
Found a thread from 2007 where Theo states www.openbsd.org is a
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
quit using the site without the www's. :)
Yes, I've made a mental note to that effect and already edited my bookmarks.
nowww.openbsd.org is not the source and never was (at least in the ten
years I've been on the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmmm are you on alpha or landisk that you follow those instructions?
No, but I think a landshark was knocking at the door at the time and
interrupted my train of thought :)
In reality, the instructions weren't labelled
, the question is, how do I get gcc-4.x back ?
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org
wrote:
Problems building -current userland:
==
=== libcurses
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses B B -c codes.c -o codes.o
cc
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
you may be able to extract the comp set
I did extract the comp set from the latest snapshot and gcc-4.x was returned.
However, once again the kernel compiled fine but received the same
error with the userland,
Chris
Problems building -current userland:
==
=== libcurses
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c codes.c -o codes.o
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c comp_captab.c -o
comp_captab.o
cc -O2 -pipe -g -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libcurses-c
Searching for a method to create a table based on the contents a file
but slightly modified without needing to modify the file itself.
Non-modified example is:
table fromfile persist file /mypath/assortedaddresses
Yet, attempts to modify do not work:
table fromfile persist { !x.x.x.x/y, file
Hello,
I'm not seeing any PCIe wireless devices listed under amd64 supported
hardware. Does anyone know of any g/n PCIe cards that work in host AP
mode?
Thank you,
Chris
@
Have no idea if it is a driver issue but if it is this info. might assist.
Thanks,
Chris
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org
wrote:
System is hanging and I'm getting these errors after upgrading to
-current:
==
em0
System is hanging and I'm getting these errors after upgrading to -current:
==
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
==
I can still boot and run with the old kernel but the new one is not working.
From dmesg:
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
