I believe I've stumbled across an issue with filters in -current
This seems to have only bitten since updating from 4.2 release to -
current anyway ...
80.252.124.20 is in group switches
yet ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgpctl sh rib nei 80.252.124.20 out
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via
On 29 Jun 2007, at 08:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-29 02:56]:
I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems
with our multihop sessions since the upgrade.
errr
On 29 Jun 2007, at 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I know ... whether it's just something that has now cropped up
because it's
the first time these several of these boxes have been rebooted in
months ...
The addition of nexthop qualify via bgp seems to have overcome
things ..
however
65123
Nexthop 84.246.195.116 (via 80.252.119.2) from 84.246.195.116
(84.246.195.116)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 200, external, valid, best
Last update: 5d21h14m ago
Community: 8282:400 NO_EXPORT
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax
On 5 Jun 2007, at 08:42, OndEej SurC= wrote:
Henning Brauer pm9e v So 21. 04. 2007 v 15:38 +0200:
* Ond??ej Sur?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-21 14:58]:
Hi,
Jon Morby pm9e v So 21. 04. 2007 v 12:13 +0100:
Not sure if you're still trying to fix this, or if you're
sorted
but if you're
8282 0 6 0 Never
Active
Regards,
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
web: www.fido.net
tel: +44 (0) 845 004 3050
fax: +44 (0) 845 004 3051
On 1 Mar 2007, at 07:13, Esben Norby wrote:
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 14:58:49 Jon Morby wrote:
Unless I'm missing something OpenOSPFD doesn't currently seem to
support IPv6 ?
IPv6 is not supported currently, and I think it will be a while
before that
happens.
/Esben
What would
On 21 Apr 2007, at 14:38, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Ond??ej Sur?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-21 14:58]:
Hi,
Jon Morby pm9e v So 21. 04. 2007 v 12:13 +0100:
Not sure if you're still trying to fix this, or if you're
sorted
but if you're still having problems
What does your filters
On 30 Apr 2007, at 10:51, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 04:39:07AM +0100, Jon Morby wrote:
I've updated to the latest snapshot and am seeing the following from
bgpd
Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[28142]: fatal in RDE: aspath_count:
bula bula
Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[30043
:
Broken pipe
As far as I can tell there have been no major changes to bgpd.conf in
between upgrades
Any ideas?
Regards,
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
web: www.fido.net
tel: +44 (0) 845 004 3050
fax: +44 (0) 845 004 3051
Not sure if you're still trying to fix this, or if you're sorted
but if you're still having problems
What does your filters section look like ?
On 16 Apr 2007, at 16:28, OndEej SurC= wrote:
I have configured openbgpd on openbsd 4.0 (upgraded from 3.8) and
there
seems to be problem
of memory
--
Jon Morby
fido.net - the internet made simple!
as this is on a production
server ... but I'm hoping it's just a stupid config error somewhere
that can easily resolved ?
This is on -current as of a week ago
Any ideas?
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
Thanks Claudio ... you guys are super stars! :)
Seems to be working a treat
Now to work out the filters :(
/etc/bgpd.conf:796: king bula sez: AF_INET only
796:allow quick to any prefix 2a01:2c0::/32
What's the correct way to ensure your AF_INET6 prefixes are properly
exported?
On 27 Mar
Nope ... seems to result in a LOT of these
received notification: Cease, max-prefix exceeded
for all our v4 peers / etc
On 27 Mar 2007, at 19:25, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:12:50PM +0100, Jon Morby wrote:
Thanks Claudio ... you guys are super stars! :)
Seems
On 20 Mar 2007, at 10:03, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:25:25PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
Might be a dumb question, but what's the equivalent of
neighbor ip address remove-private-as
in OpenBGPD
I've just noticed we're advertising prefixes 65xxx to our upstream
providers
Might be a dumb question, but what's the equivalent of
neighbor ip address remove-private-as
in OpenBGPD
I've just noticed we're advertising prefixes 65xxx to our upstream
providers when we should be stripping them from our advertisements.
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
but
truncated as 7 characters plus a null character instead of the full 8
character password
This is with -current
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
On 17 Mar 2007, at 14:48, Jon Morby wrote:
Doing an ospfctl reload seems to result in problems with simple
authentication enabled
Mar 17 14:44:14 l2-c1 ospfd[7096]: recv_packet: authentication
error, interface vlan544
Mar 17 14:44:45 l2-c1 last message repeated 213 times
Checking
On 17 Mar 2007, at 15:42, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Can you try this diff?
--
:wq Claudio
Yup that did the tric
Thanks!
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
On 17 Mar 2007, at 16:41, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/03/17 16:13, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/03/17 15:08, Jon Morby wrote:
Checking tcpdump it seems that the password is being passed but
truncated as 7 characters plus a null character instead of the full
8 character password
try
On 12 Mar 2007, at 10:31, Claudio Jeker wrote:
... and here is the patch to fix the issue.
Yup does indeed seem to have solved the problem!
Thanks Claudio / guys!
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
On 10 Mar 2007, at 14:58, Akin Nomad wrote:
c: 2001:16c8:ffd7::b:33.255.3.2
I would say this one on the basis that (notation of) IPv6
addresses are colon separated and IPv4 addresses are period separated
and this uses a mixture of colon an period
But I could be wrong.
--
Jon Morby
On 11 Mar 2007, at 12:37, Philip Guenther wrote:
On 3/11/07, Jon Morby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Mar 2007, at 14:58, Akin Nomad wrote:
c: 2001:16c8:ffd7::b:33.255.3.2
I would say this one on the basis that (notation of) IPv6
addresses are colon separated and IPv4 addresses
using 93.2K of memory
and holding 91791 references
3977 BGP attributes using 25.5K of memory
RIB using 26.3M of memory
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
Ok thanks for that .. guess it's time to dig out quagga again :(
Cheers
On 1 Mar 2007, at 07:13, Esben Norby wrote:
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 14:58:49 Jon Morby wrote:
Unless I'm missing something OpenOSPFD doesn't currently seem to
support IPv6 ?
IPv6 is not supported currently, and I
Unless I'm missing something OpenOSPFD doesn't currently seem to
support IPv6 ?
Are there any recommendations as to what we should use to manage
dynamic routing of IPv6 addresses within a WAN?
(or am I missing something obvious?)
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845
Hi Bray
What do the logs say?
Also, try running dhcpd with -d -f
-d Force dhcpd to log to stderr. This can be useful for
debugging,
and also at sites where a complete log of all dhcp
activity must
be kept, but syslogd(8) is not reliable or otherwise
I'm having problems with ospfd in -current
Up until about 2 weeks ago this was working however since updating to
more recent snapshots (including last night's build) ospfd no longer
seems to recognise link on the vlan interface at boot up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ospfctl sh in
Interface Address
scopeid 0x8
inet 80.252.126.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 80.252.126.255
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
On 12 Feb 2007, at 13:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/12 12:44, Jon Morby wrote:
My problem is that graphs of the 2 cisco ports show traffic is only
going via the 1 port and not being balanced across both ports as I
would have expected.
loadbalance hashes the header to determine which
at 10baseT I guess
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
to ensure we allow
for over head
Cheers
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
33 matches
Mail list logo
