On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Thanks, but my goal was not just to add more text consoles, it was to
actually create more
VTs on existing heads. I have 3 monitors. We're all painfully aware
of the Xorg limitations
with multiple pci graphics
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Need Coffee need.cof...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an OpenBSD-current machine running xdm, xdmcp enabled.
If I try to connect to it from a Solaris 9 machine with Xinerama enabled,
I get
I have an OpenBSD-current machine running xdm, xdmcp enabled.
If I try to connect to it from a Solaris 9 machine with Xinerama enabled,
I get this in /var/log/xdm.log:
X Error of failed request: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 129 (XINERAMA)
Minor
on existing heads. I have 3 monitors. We're all painfully aware
of the Xorg limitations
with multiple pci graphics cards. So, I wanted to run them in text
mode (80x50 of course :)
80x50 is easy. It's the getting all 3 monitors to work
independently that isn't.
2009/5/22 Need Coffee
Hi, I have kind of a weird question.
I have two video cards in an amd64/-current machine.
Both cards have dual-head capability.
At the text console, the same text appears on both ports.
Would it be possible to either:
- make the ports separate consoles (seems unlikely)
- run each card
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks in advance. I hope I'm making sense on limited caffeine.
I fear it wasn't clear what I was asking...
please forgive the reply to my own post.
When configured with e.g.
ifconfig carp0 inet 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
This is a dumb question. I apologize in advance.
If I have 5 machines configured for carp IP balancing
as 10.0.0.1
and from one of those machines I try to connect to 10.0.0.1
I would assume the machine would talk to itself only based
on the routing table.
But I have seen hints that lead me to
I finally upgraded a zaurus to the current snapshot (Jul 03).
I had transferred the sets via cdcef/cdce, though it TIMEOUT'd during
several transfers and had to be unplugged/plugged in again. However now
that it's upgraded to 4.4-beta, when I do this:
pc% sudo ifconfig cdce0 inet 192.168.10.11
... and that's where I'm stuck (no way of getting the PHY
to attach to a manually configured bge).
Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to use GENERIC.MP on a couple of boxes that share bge1 with a
built-in service processor for remote management
I'd like to use GENERIC.MP on a couple of boxes that share bge1 with a
built-in service processor for remote management, but when the kernel boots,
it locks up the SP). I understand this is normal.
Using config -e, I have disabled bge* and added a custom bge0 that attaches
fine. The problem is
I have relayd in production with textbook (or manpage) examples
of doing redirects to backend webservers.
relayd seems to notice host state changes properly and makes
the necessary pf table adjustments. The problem is that the pf
states take so long to expire, that any clients that have existing
I believe I encountered the bug referenced here the other day on amd64,
checking-out xenocara:
http://www.webservertalk.com/archive248-2005-7-1143312.html
This is known, it's the infamous 64-bit cvs bug. Some of the fonts in
XF4 cause any 64-bit client to allocate too much memory on the server
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tautvydas Bruzas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you read archives it's a known problem with sticky-address. If you
remove sticky-address everything works as expected.
I searched for hours before posting, I guess I need to pick different keywords
or
I feel I should probably know why, but I can't seem to find anything
explaining it... and my curiosity is just too great.
Why does the console behave differently in bsd.rd vs. bsd?
I can almost always get serial console to work on some sun amd64
machines with bsd.rd, regardless of console
consist of.
On Feb 7, 2008 2:52 AM, Srebrenko Sehic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 8:40 AM, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Need Coffee wrote:
Does anyone run OpenBSD on blade servers? I don't mean
Sun Blade 150 kind of hardware, but rather blade
Does anyone run OpenBSD on blade servers? I don't mean
Sun Blade 150 kind of hardware, but rather blade chassis
with server blades (a la Sun Blade 8000, HP, Dell, etc.).
I'd appreciate any details... I'm having a bit of trouble finding
anything conclusive about OpenBSD on blades.
Thanks in
On 11/2/06, Will Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used cfengine on large (500+ nodes) Linux clusters. There lots
of things I wish were better in cfengine, but I haven't found a more
capable tool. For one-time mass administration tasks, I use dsh from
sysutils/clusterit, though the scenario
plan9/larswm. Small, fast, and shuffles windows around so you don't have to.
Also very good for folks that prefer the keyboard over the mouse.
On 5/30/06, Sam Chill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/06, akonsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
has anyone tried evilwm
On 5/20/06, Chad M Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I worked with a customer once that had a software based load
balancing solution. I liked the way it worked. While I was working
on the box if I was going to take the service down for maintenance I
could tell the local agent and the box was
V40z's do the same thing... keeps the console busy :)
I saw at least one commit that looked relevant... is this fixed in -current?
On 5/11/06, Alten, David (FIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm seeing errors on a Sun Fire v20Z BIOS 2.4.0.6, similar to what was
posted last week under
Maybe my reply didn't make it: use ports' mail/nail package.
On 4/24/06, D. E. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm the only one around who still uses it, but there's one
option in mailx from SysV that I miss with OpenBSD: ~a. It would
be simpler to have either ~a to add the --
Hello all,
I'm having some issues with bge on sun v40z systems with OpenBSD/amd64
3.8-stable
and -current, SMP and UP.
dmesg snippet:
bge0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
(0x1002): apic 5 int 1 (irq 5) address [snip correct mac addr]
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5703
) clients.
Again thanks in advance
On 2/9/06, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having some issues with bge on sun v40z systems with OpenBSD/amd64
3.8-stable
and -current, SMP and UP.
dmesg snippet:
bge0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
running memtest86 on both boxes
just to rule out memory issues. So far, no errors on the machine in
question...
Thanks.
On 11/8/05, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have an amd64/3.7-stable machine here running apache with mod_ssl
and php 5.0.4. SSLMutex is set to 'sem', the default
Hi.
I have an amd64/3.7-stable machine here running apache with mod_ssl
and php 5.0.4. SSLMutex is set to 'sem', the default. Intermittently
the httpds start segfaulting.
Of course the parent process remains, and respawns them. There's a
large number of clients
and the machine is kept pretty
That's awesome news. I have the same setup (4cpu/16GB).
Thanks very much for the response (and ddp also)... I will
happily test anything that comes out.
On 5/19/05, Jason George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/05, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been searching but can't find
I've been searching but can't find anything concrete... amd64.html
and the FAQ's amd64 section do not mention any problems, so I'm
asking here. (I found little bits here and there about this problem
affecting a lot of freenixes but nothing tangible. Apologies if I've
missed something
27 matches
Mail list logo
