Re: soekris + openbsd server buy question

2010-12-04 Thread Pierre Lamy
I've run both, and agree with this. The Soekris isn't built with very good parts (== unstable over time), the Lanner box is a solid performer. I'm going to try out the 7535 soon. Pierre On 12/4/2010 5:21 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote: 2010/12/3shweg...@gmail.com: Hello, I'm considering buying a

Re: OpenBGP: announcing network to different peers

2009-03-12 Thread Pierre Lamy
It's really easy, you can send some of the 1's and 0s to peer 21, and some 1's and 0's to peer2. Assuming the halves are contiguous, you would probably announce 2x /21's. You could also really try and be very specific and announce them as a bunch of /32's, this would give you the granularity

Re: high load irq trouble

2008-02-07 Thread Pierre Lamy
Look at everything on interrupt queue 10. pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt bge1 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5721 rev 0x11, BCM5750 B1 (0x4101): irq 10, address 00:17:08:2c:2a:76 em2 at pci7 dev 6 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 10, address

Re: date -u gives wrong timezone output?

2007-04-11 Thread Pierre Lamy
GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time. P jared r r spiegel wrote: On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick ! wrote: On 4/10/07, Markus Bergkvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 'date -u' on a 4.0 -stable will give something like Tue Apr 10 22:03:24 GMT 2007 but shouldn't it be

Re: date -u gives wrong timezone output?

2007-04-11 Thread Pierre Lamy
'? If I understand it correctly, UTC is the timezone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#UTC /Markus Pierre Lamy wrote: GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time. P jared r r spiegel wrote: On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick ! wrote: On 4/10/07, Markus Bergkvist [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Odd issue - in kernel pppoe

2006-12-06 Thread Pierre Lamy
Though I should note that setting just max-mss 1440 did work. Thanks guys! Pierre Pierre Lamy wrote: Last night I wanted to try out the kernel pppoe rather than userland pppoe, on 4.0 GENERIC/i386. Took me a few minutes but I was able to setup a stable connection, surf the net etc. Many thing

Odd issue - in kernel pppoe

2006-12-05 Thread Pierre Lamy
set my internal network to 1492 to prevent any frags from being generated? Cheers, Pierre Lamy -=- My relevent pf entries # macros int_if = fxp0 #ext_if = pppoe0 ext_if = tun0 # options set skip on lo set block-policy return set loginterface $ext_if # scrub scrub in all nat on $ext_if from

Re: OpenBSD 4.0 -current + cups-1.2.5p0

2006-12-01 Thread Pierre Lamy
Hint: Try setting the LogLevel to debug to find out more. James Turner wrote: Well I fixed the permissions problem by chgrp /dev/ulpt0 to _cups. However now when I try to print there are no errors and nothing is sent to the printer. This might be my filters problem. I have a MFC-210C and

Re: PF/rdr/nat

2006-11-16 Thread Pierre Lamy
Send us a dmesg. How much memory does the box have? If it will legitimately serve that much traffic, try lowering the Apache timeouts to lower than the default (iirc 60 seconds?). Then match those timeouts to pf. Are you using source-hash in the config? That will create a state table of

Re: group ownership of /var/mail

2005-11-26 Thread Pierre Lamy
The problem is that a non-MTA is trying to write something to /var/mail, which is bad. The OpenBSD developers can't account for every third party's wierd way of doing things; you did the right thing by mailing the developer, but if they can't help you maybe you should switch to a different