I just moved my super-fantastic spamd soekris in front of a new mail
server that requires SMTP Auth to send mail... and it broke. No one
can send mail from that server.
My old server didn't require SMTP Auth and it worked fine.
I couldn't find anything in the docs or on the net that suggests
That's a really good point. However we have about 200 users we'd have
to get to switch their mail settings - 99% of don't know what mail
settings are of course.
Changing ports could prove very painful. I will definitely consider
it though, given how painful email is without greylisting.
.
Thanks Chris!
Stephen
On 8-Jan-07, at 9:41 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 1/8/07, Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from spamd to port smtp \
- 127.0.0.1 port spamd
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from !spamd-white to port smtp \
- 127.0.0.1 port
Hmmm - should sis1 have an IP?
On 9-Jan-07, at 3:54 PM, Stephen Schaff wrote:
That's what I'm starting to think...
hostname.sis0: (management interface)
inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0 NONE
hostname.sis1:
up
hostname.sis2:
up
bridgename.bridge0:
add sis1
add sis2
up
pf.conf: (as per
is a
subset of the ! whitelist - but it's faster to narrow those ones
first, then if they get past that rule, send everything not on the
whitelist to spamd.
Stephen
On 8-Jan-07, at 9:41 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 1/8/07, Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from
Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-08 18:52]:
tail -f /var/log/daemon shows:
Jan 8 02:23:38 spamd spamd[4966]: listening for incoming
connections.
That's it.
Stephen
On 8-Jan-07, at 3:54 AM, edgarz wrote:
They should be.
tail -f /var/log/daemon
there they are.
Stephen Schaff wrote:
I've
I've set up spamd on a soekris bridge. It seems to be working for the
most part. However, when I used spamdb to view the database - it only
shows WHITE entries. It appears there are no GREY entries. Have I
configured things incorrectly?
Also, if I try to send mail from a remote mail
tail -f /var/log/daemon shows:
Jan 8 02:23:38 spamd spamd[4966]: listening for incoming connections.
That's it.
Stephen
On 8-Jan-07, at 3:54 AM, edgarz wrote:
They should be.
tail -f /var/log/daemon
there they are.
Stephen Schaff wrote:
I've set up spamd on a soekris bridge. It seems
server on the other side of the bridge from my mail client to
send messages. Any idea how to work around that?
Stephen
On 8-Jan-07, at 12:19 PM, edgarz wrote:
spamd_flags=-G 5:4:864 -v
spamd_grey=YES
Stephen Schaff wrote:
tail -f /var/log/daemon shows:
Jan 8 02:23:38 spamd spamd[4966
I'm thinking about buying the Sun x2100 M2 for OpenBSD 4.0. I've
purchased one for a client that's running linux. I set it up but
don't admin it. I don't use linux, but I really like the hardware. I
want to do RAID1 with it, which the motherboard supports. However,
I'm told that the RAID
Regards,
Stephen
On 17-Dec-06, at 12:48 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wd0(pciide1:0:0): timeout
type: ata
c_bcount: 65536
c_skip: 0
pciide1:0:0: bus-master DMA error: missing interrupt, status=0x21
wd0d: device timeout reading fsbn
I've got 4.0 running nicely on a server sitting in a data centre,
thanks to the help of the members of this list.
It's been up since Nov. 22nd and in production.
Yesterday it inexplicably went dark. I went down to check it out, and
hooked up the monitor and keyboard. I could see the
this problem quickly.
Regards,
Stephen
On 15-Nov-06, at 10:19 PM, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:17 PM, Stephen Schaff wrote:
this is my first post to the list - so please bear with me...
I have 2 amd64 machines that I plan on using in production, and 1
amd64 machine at home
-slow.
On 11/15/06, Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is my first post to the list - so please bear with me...
I have 2 amd64 machines that I plan on using in production, and 1
amd64 machine at home for testing.
I tried installing the amd64 openbsd on both machines and discovered
Thank you for your suggestions. It looks like write caching is
enabled. I've pasted the results below.
Stephen
On 16-Nov-06, at 3:53 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/11/16 01:02, Stephen Schaff wrote:
I just don't understand how there can be a difference factor of 10.
factor of 100
this is my first post to the list - so please bear with me...
I have 2 amd64 machines that I plan on using in production, and 1
amd64 machine at home for testing.
I tried installing the amd64 openbsd on both machines and discovered
that doing a make on anything goes really, really slowly. I
matches BIOS drive 0x82
wd3: no disk label
dkcsum: wd3 matches BIOS drive 0x83
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
On 15-Nov-06, at 9:36 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote:
Dmesg?
Nvidia chipsets are dog-slow.
On 11/15/06, Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is my first post
17 matches
Mail list logo
