On 14/06/2021 08.15, Stuart Longland wrote:
Secondly, isn't it a bit late to tell me _now_ that your email is
confidential _after_ I have read the body in full? I don't know how
people read emails in the European Union, but here in Australia, I
start at the top and read to the bottom, not
On 27/10/2020 12.32, Andreas X wrote:
Greetings. On OpenBSD 6.8, I have unbound enabled in my server, (server
gets its IP via DHCP from my server provider)
In resolv.conf I have a "search your-server.de" line and I don't know what
hostname is that.
My own hostname is something different.
That
On 04/09/2020 18.07, Brian Brombacher wrote:
Well, let’s say a Linter doesn’t exist and you can’t invest time to make one.
Do you have a lower environment, mirror-exact ideally, to run tests on the
pre-receive hook?
It’s an interesting issue you’re trying to solve ;)
I didn't say I can't
On 04/09/2020 17.40, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Sep 4, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
Hi there misc!
Is there an external pfctl linter? we have bunch pf firwalls for which we
generate rules but also write some manual ones
On 04/09/2020 17.24, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
Hi there misc!
Is there an external pfctl linter? we have bunch pf firwalls for which we
generate rules but also write some manual ones that get merged. Would be nice
if we could lint
Hi there misc!
Is there an external pfctl linter? we have bunch pf firwalls for which
we generate rules but also write some manual ones that get merged. Would
be nice if we could lint the rules before committed to vcs.. (yes we
test before they are applied on the machines as well but that is
On 26/05/2020 15.34, Kanto Andria wrote:
Hello,
man ndp is probably another solution
This is the correct way since it is v6 :)
/T
On 26/05/2020 11.38, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
What is the OpenBSD equivalent to this Linux command?
ip neighbor add 2001:db8::1 dev xnf0 lladdr fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff router nud
permanent
It doesn’t need to be a single command. If the existing userspace
tooling does not support this, is it possible
On 11/05/2020 21.23, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-05-11, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
On 10/05/2020 23.30, Isak Holmström wrote:
I do believe it's using the "new" limit introduced 2017 :)
my $default_maxlen = 280;
I found this on GitHub. Though there a reference in the code to 140
On 10/05/2020 23.30, Isak Holmström wrote:
> I do believe it's using the "new" limit introduced 2017 :)
>
> my $default_maxlen = 280;
>
> I found this on GitHub. Though there a reference in the code to 140.
Yes.. I might not have counted the characters actually used and assumed
it was 140 since
Hi there!
Does anybody on this list manage @OpenBSD_CVS? Would be nice to lift the
message truncation from the old 140char limit to the new 280char limit. Super
annoying when I can't read an interesting commit message that is just a little
longer :)
--
TN
On 10/12/2019 01.12, Todd C. Miller wrote:
That was probably the following commit:
https://www.mail-archive.com/source-changes@openbsd.org/msg111985.html
which has since been reverted:
https://www.mail-archive.com/source-changes@openbsd.org/msg112279.html
Great! Thanks for the info, hope it
Hi there misc
I can see that there is a big drop in the throughput graphs, is
something wrong with the data or was there a change that set performance
= false?
http://bluhm.genua.de/perform/results/perform.html
--
Tommy
On 22/10/2019 18.01, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The firmwares are intentionally kept out of the standard download zone.
I'll talk to some people and see if there is a way we can shift things
around, to make slight improvements.
However, I don't see how anything we do would fix your problem.
Hi!
I have some systems without access to the Internets and with internal
mirrors for packages and fw_update packages. But when openbsd does a
sysupgrade or a new install it runs fw_update against
firmware.openbsd.org. The problem here is that it will hang until the
timeout is reached.
#
On 24/05/2019 12.25, open...@kene.nu wrote:
Hello,
I finally got to testing this and the bug seems to be fixed. What is
the recommended way of implementing this fix into a critical
production environment?
Should we wait for a syspatch (will one be made available for this bug)?
It is possible
On 03/02/2019 19.09, Tony Sarendal wrote:
Good evening,
We inserted a 2x40G NIC into one of our old franken-pc's, and got this:
ixl0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel XL710 QSFP+" rev 0x02: port 0, FW
5.0.40043 API 1.5, msi, address 0c:c4:7a:5e:f9:c8
ixl0: unable to query phy types
ixl1 at pci2
u do with it then? Could this be used for what
this thread is talking about or is it totally off?
--
Tommy Nevtelen
On 2018-08-30 22:11, Jon Tabor wrote:
>
>
> Yep, right there with ya. So, ah...what's everyone using for mail
> filtering these days? Spamassassin? ClamAV? Something else entirely?
>
I tag my mail as spam with rspamd and then filter it with sieve in dovecot.
Additionally I use a sieve
On 2018-08-31 10:44, Daniel Polak wrote:
Tommy Nevtelen wrote on 30-8-2018 23:13:
We use isakmpd to interconnect 30ish routers and I would like to switch
to iked, but since there is no support to run both at the same time it
makes it quite hard to migrate slowly. Will basically need to do
On 2018-08-30 22:06, Daniel Polak wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 17:39, Philipp Buehler wrote:
>> I was not following development too closely, but I think that on the
>> kernel side
>> things have not changed. Which means iked and isakmpd will happily
>> "toe tap"
>> on each others SADB in the kernel
On 03/14/2018 10:06 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Sorry, if I hijack the thread, but what do you guys use for netflow
> analysis?
This looks quite interesting https://github.com/robcowart/elastiflow
I have not tried it but would like to when time allows.
--
Tommy Nevtelen
l/awesome-selfhosted/blob/master/README.md#social-networks-and-forums
It's a pretty nice repo with cool projects other than forums as well.
--
Tommy Nevtelen
need to fix a few bugs before we can consider enabling it.
>
Good to know. Thanks for the quick update Peter :)
--
Tommy Nevtelen
a small
update :)
--
Tommy Nevtelen
On 2017-06-10 05:25, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/17 11:18, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>> On 2017-06-09 17:46, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>>
>>> Hello misc!
>>>
>>> I'm chain-loading pxeboot symlinked to auto_install from ipxe.
>> So I tried t
On 2017-06-09 17:46, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
> Hello misc!
>
> I'm chain-loading pxeboot symlinked to auto_install from ipxe.
So I tried to remove ipxe and specify pxeboot directly in the dhcp
filename, that worked.
But with that said I still don't understand why it works on a VM but
: px0 com0 pxe![2.1]
pxeinfo: PXENV_GET_CACHED_INFO failed: 0x60
mem[578K 3444M 639M a20=on]
disk: fd0 fd1 hd0+
Then it hangs there until I reboot the machine.
HALP! );
--
Tommy Nevtelen
28 matches
Mail list logo
