#
Nah. Should be
GPL V-infinity
That way there won't be any more.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.22.1 on an i686 machine (5588.29 BogoMips).
My book : http://www.AbominableFirebug.com/
_
The information
an empty shell?
--
Funny quotes:
36. You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive.
Fri_, Spammer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
How about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.22.1 on an i686 machine (5588.30 BogoMips).
My book : http
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
Best regards,
--
Dick Visser
TERENA (IT Support Officer)
Singel 468D 1017AW
i have done some searching for ways to graph 2 and 3-d data using a C program on
openbsd and not found anything particularly satisfactory. perhaps i'm not using
the right keywords. i need to graph data from a C program and would prefer one
library or other program (preferably port) with a C API
Original message
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 02:37:48 +0200
From: Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: When would you NOT use OpenBSD?
To: misc@openbsd.org
On 2006-04-05 19:52:16 -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
Slightly offtopic, but ironically a related-page that showed up for
i need to learn C++, but do not know where to begin with textbooks or online
docs. since, AFAICT, there are a great many skilled programmers on list, i would
appreciate any recommendations that can be made about introductory and
intermediate texts on C++.
my motivation for asking this is to avoid
having had a gander at the 3.9 song, which is quite amusing, i had an idea that
might be useful and i suspect it is ill-conceived. i have the utmost confidence
that readers of misc@ can quickly elucidate why it is a stupid idea.
if the integrity of closed-source binary blob drivers is
The 10 people who are helping get it. They know that help is about
action, and that if you stops at just words, it just plain isn't help.
the extent to which this thread has wasted time and not helped to draw any new
conclusions is astonishing. theo makes a good point when he accounts for the
i'm putting a machine into production in the next week or two that uses binary
CGI scripts. i want to add additional layers of security beyond having apache
chroot-ed in case the binaries decide to run amok. things that occur to me as a
good idea are systrace and sbox (see
Original message
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:35:47 -0500
From: Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: restore question: is my dump hosed?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Thus spake Joachim Schipper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/03/06 00:34]:
: Provided that you didn't do something strange when
i made what i thought would be a fine backup of a freebsd-6.0 machine using
dump. more specifically i issued a
# dump -0f - /usr | ssh -o 'EscapeChar none' [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat
/usr/dumps/usr.fs
this created usr.fs on my openbsd backup host. now that i'm trying to restore
the dump on my backup
i saw a post just recently on bsdforums.org about getting the linux version of
skype running on freebsd, http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=39145
. i'm trying to get this working on openbsd, but when i run the static binary
with Qt compiled in, it tells me:
skype: error while
Original message
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 21:40:31 -0500
From: Barry, Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: skype on openbsd?
To: misc@openbsd.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March
OpenBSD Vista - Home Basic. (aka. Vista Home, Dave Fuestel)
Same as Home - Premium, but has all the man pages deleted to save
valuable space.
LOL! there could be a special mailing list for Vista users: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:19:33 +0100
From: Jean-Sibastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
To: misc@openbsd.org
Reid Nichol a icrit :
--- Jean-So?=bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Kilian a icrit :
a) 4 is
Original message
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Reid Nichol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
To: Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
superior reply
Backup MX is a relic and a legacy. It breaks almost all spam filters.
Modern mail infrastructure doesn't need it, except in rare cases.
me thinks this is spreading FUD. define modern mail infrastructure. perhaps
the origin of the FUD is the M$ visual studio .net overexposure?
Original message
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:35:31 + (GMT)
From: Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tutorial for securing wifi networks with ipsec and openbsd,
somewhere?
To: misc@openbsd.org
hello,
I've read man ipsec and vpn. Unfortunately I'm totally new to ipsec and
based on my previous posts about trouble with svnd encryption having not
garnered any replies (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=113717720822507w=2 ), i'm going
to rephrase my questions.
- what methods, if any, can be used to reliably encrypt my virtual mailboxes so
that they are
heya,
i've got the postfix-2.2.5p0-sasl2 port on an openbsd 3.7-stable machine. the
setup has been working great thus far, but now that i'm trying to encrypt my
virtual mailbox directory (using vnconfig) i'm encountering problems that i
can't resolve myself.
i have everything working fine
what do you guys think about this response i got on the postfix-users list?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:28:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ ls -al protected
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 204800 Jan 13 11:26 protected
sudo vnconfig -ck -v /dev/svnd0c /home/protected
sudo mount -o
Original message
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:39:02 +0100
From: Said Outgajjouft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blowfish still good enough?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Travies all crypto is breakable. The only demand on crypto is how long
in takes to break it. If it takes more than 5 years
heya,
i've established IPsec connections originating from several windows xp machines
with public IPs to my openbsd firewall that is running isakmpd. they are working
just fine. however, i have a windows machine here at home behind NAT that is
giving me grief when i try to establish an IPsec
Original message
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:27:42 -0800
From: Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blowfish still good enough?
To: Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern is the strength of Blowfish--it's
heya,
i've been grinding away to get a VPN setup where i can have win xp clients
connect to my openbsd firewall and access the network behind it. i have tried a
number of things, none of which have yet worked for all my users. i am very much
interested in hearing from other admins who have
Original message
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:56:33 +0100
From: Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #define failure opportunity
To: misc@openbsd.org
The people who they are addressing are bussiness, and they think
in terms of gaining money and loosing money.
Open Source Software
Original message
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:14:22 +0800
From: Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: skype security?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Skype was brought to you by the same people who brought you
Kazaa. Draw your own conclusions regarding ethics, security and
openness from
i searched the archives for messages about skype, but i didn't find anything
that addressed whether the skype service is safe or not. i did a google for
skype security and one of the first links talks about a couple serious
exploits of skype and the glowing (a.k.a. sponsored) review from dr.
heya,
i have fixed public IPs and i have ADSL using PPPoE. i would like to make things
very redundant, so that if any one piece of hardware craps out, there will be a
failover. i have conceived of a setup and am wondering if anyone can suggest
improvements or tell me if it just won't work. here
since i've heard that the new ipsec.conf and ipsecctl command
simplify setting up vpns, i figured i would give the old way
of isakmpd.conf another pass to help me figure out the new
syntax. now that i have gone back and tried to setup isakmpd
as a tunnel between two machines on my home newtork
oops, didn't realize my attachments would get stripped. here
are the isakmpd -d -DA=10 and tcpdump outputs i mentioned in
the first message:
i've included the outputs from each instance of isakmpd and a
tcpdump from the host in between them as attachments.
isakmpd.peer-X.out:
085803.480596
heya,
i tried this setup with IPV4 addresses on the same subnet (10.0.3.1 and
10.0.3.2) and it worked fine, i.e. i tcpdump -i enc0 and see encapsulated
packets. this leaves me wondering what it is about my prior setup that made it
not work.
i saw no appreciable difference in the outputs from
paul,
when I purchsed 3 there were all kinds of problems with
loading on a laptop
Now I purchsed 3.7 and it looks like this is the final end of
the road
for openbsd and me
I tolerated figuring out the wireless settings and even
though there is
some reason for a huge time lag installing packages
i'm currently using bzip2-ed dumps to backup my machines and i
wonder if there is a better way to do it. by better i mean
more secure and more automated than adding cron jobs.
i am interested in encrypted backups, as i would prefer to
have non-hijackable backups. i did see
So there's no solution? I see now that the packet flow
doesn't support it,
but logically it does make sense to want an IP from that
DHCP server
to be given to the other interface, after all any systems
hanging off that
interface *will* get an address from the DHCP server on the other
side of the
jon and marco,
thx for the quick replies. this is more or less what i expected.
if you install through the RAID controller, shouldn't it
autodetect the number of actually available sectors (i.e. the
full size modulo that required for the RAID info)? that's
the thing that really surprised me.
heya,
i got an LSI MegaRAID SATA 300-8X a couple weeks ago and i
noticed it was not quite behaving. by this i mean that i had
a 200GB disk on which i had installed a 3.8 snapshot and i
plugged it into the RAID controller and booted the machine. it
loaded the kernel just fine, but when it came
per,
We can argue back and forth on the pros and cons of building
1TB
partitions or not, but the need for these giant allocations
are real
enough and from a commen/broader view (small business) the
demand is
also moving closer and closer. At work we have a disk-to-disk
backup
server for (for
heya,
i'm interested in getting an AFS server setup, but openAFS
1.3.87 will not compile from source on 3.8-current (same as
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=112867186930581w=2).
i also noticed that ober had posted a howto for getting
openAFS working on openbsd 3.7 (see
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, bridge(4) doesn't
support
pppoe(4) as a possible interface. I don't know why, but it
just
rejects it. Anyone know of a workaround for this? I'm on a
100mb/s
FTTH line so a userland pppoe is not an option.
Kory T
i don't think you can filter
heya,
i'm interested in getting an 8-channel SATA RAID controller
that runs on the ami driver so i can use all the new neato
RAID functionality for my backup server. i haven't seen
anything in the archives about a known working controller like
i've described, but i did see the LSI MegaRAID SATA
...and when some idiot vendor changes chips without
changing product
code, what then?
The virtual store is a half-baked idea, I know. I'm just
looking for
additional ways to support OpenBSD. In the above case, I
return the
product and inform the virtual store that the referral isn't
good any
Hi
I have two harddisks:
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: Maxtor 91360U4
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 12982MB, 26588016 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: IC35L080AVVA07-0
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 78533MB, 160836480 sectors
wd1(pciide0:1:0):
depends on how you measure greatest. i think several of the
border states in the US declared a state of emergency about
the most profitable, and probably best known, mexican
export. ;)
and no, it's not viagra.
it's a big problem on both sides of the border.
However, one is wondering what the
Mexico's greatest exports to the US are poverty and disease.
You ignorant fool.
depends on how you measure greatest. i think several of the
border states in the US declared a state of emergency about
the most profitable, and probably best known, mexican export. ;)
and no, it's not viagra.
theo,
We ask our users to help us uncover and fix more of these bugs in
applications. Some will even be exploitable. Instead of
saying that
OpenBSD is busted in this regard, please realize that the
software
which is crashing is showing how shoddily it was written.
Then help
us fix it. For
gary,
Original message
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:13:32 -0700
From: Gary Clemans-Gibbon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Boot hanging following power out - it's worse
Cc: OpenBSD misc-list misc@openbsd.org
I rebooted the box and now it is hanging with
Automatic boot in progress:
alex,
Hi, I actually use PVM on Linux...
2005/8/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
cc -DIMA_BSD386 -I../../include -I../../tracer -I../../src
-DSOCKADHASLEN -DNOREXEC -DRSHCOMMAND=\/usr/bin/rsh\
-DHASSTDLIB -DNEEDMENDIAN -DHASERRORVA
S -o pvm cons.o cmds.o job.o trc.o
heya,
i'm trying to get PVM 3.4.5 to compile from source on a
3.6-release system and have run into some problems. when i
first attempted this, i got the following error:
...
cc -DIMA_BSD386 -I../../include -I../../tracer -I../../src
-DSOCKADHASLEN -DNOREXEC -DRSHCOMMAND=\/usr/bin/rsh\
greetz,
me and a C++ programmer i know have a C++ program that would
compile cleanly and run when using gcc 2.95.3 (from openbsd
3.6-release), but now that i've upgraded to 3.7-release, which
uses gcc 3.3.5, he gets errors on compilation. since neither
of us are very familiar with the details of
lo all,
i've been looking into clustering a couple dual-processor
openbsd boxen (both running 3.7-release and bsd.mp) and
haven't found very much documentation on the topic. i figured
that either MPICH2 or PVM would be a good route, but i tried
to compile MPICH2 from source and encountered
51 matches
Mail list logo
