Yet my upstream still prefers core2a as correct route to our network. I
noticed, that only core2a networks have announced flag, is that right?
Any other ideas what could be wrong?
If you look at the Loc-Rib aka 'bgpctl show rib 194.143.152.1 all' it will
show you that there are two networks
A) look at bgpd -nv output and check if the filter rules make sense.
They look fine, only filter rules on core2b are affected and they look
like this:
match from 159.148.214.101 set { prepend-neighbor 3 }
match to 159.148.214.101 set { prepend-self 3 }
deny from any
allow from any
# core2a:
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete
flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
AI* 194.143.152.0/230.0.0.0100 0 21178 i
# core2b:
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I =
Hello,
I'm having hard time figuring out what's wrong with my or my upstream
setup. I have set up 2 BGP routers, each with its own session to the
same upstream BGP router. Primary router has pretty much default
settings for upstream router and IBGP session with secondary router.
Secondary router
What am I missing here?
A) look at bgpd -nv output and check if the filter rules make sense.
They look fine, only filter rules on core2b are affected and they look
like this:
match from 159.148.214.101 set { prepend-neighbor 3 }
match to 159.148.214.101 set { prepend-self 3 }
deny from any
Hello,
I'm trying to implement CARP on our edge BGP OpenBSD routers. CARP
itself seems to be working perfectly but I'm having problems figuring
out how to propertly configure BGP.
I have couple of external IP's on my network, so limited number of them
is not an issue (as it's often with internet
Hello,
I'd like to look at some virtualization options for openbsd. The ultimate
goal would be to get several isolated Debian systems running inside some
kind of enironment for virtualization.
Can you point me to an openbsd package, port or source code for the
freebsd jail or an equivalent?
You
i was wondering if it was possible to use known_hosts for some kind
of local alias database.
That's what ~/.ssh/config file is for, for example:
--
Host box
HostName 111.222.333.444
Host box2
HostName some.domain.name
--
p.
# -
# FILTER SETTINGS:
set block-policy drop
set skip on lo0
set loginterface $ext_if
set limit table-entries 25
A guess: the table-entries limits the total table entries 183469+70604
is larger than 25.
You're right, limiting
You forgot spamlogd
I did not, it starts automatically when spamd_grey is enabled in
Oh. Sorry. I didn's see it in your ps grep. I see it with the same
ps grep on my system.
dumbcat[root]# ps aux | grep spamd
_spamd 14450 0.0 0.1 9040 1376 ?? IsTue12AM1:53.41 spamd: (pf
What could be wrong? What have I been missing?
probably a pf rules thing, (not logging port 25 connections, etc.)
This is content of my pf.conf:
# -
# TABLES AND VARIABLES:
ext_if=rl0
table spamd persist
table spamd-white persist
#
I don't see anything obvious, other than if you
have somehow broken your system to pfctl can't add the addreses
to the table.
try
pfctl -tspamd-white -Tadd 111.111.111.111 pfctl -tspamd-white -Tshow
Do you see the address addeed to the table when you do it
manually?
I do:
--
#
Hello,
I'm having some weird problem with spamd in greylisting mode. The
problem is that spamd-white table stays empty all the time. I've
reread the manpages for a few times now and I have other spamd setup
running on other mailserver (3.9 though) like a charm without any
problems with pretty
Hello,
We're a small ISP working on redesigning our network's topology and
the overall architecture before replacing the existing
infrastructure, which happens to be different variations of low cost
router-boards running Linux. The ultimate goal thus being to run
OpenBSD wherever we can.
A job
14 matches
Mail list logo
