Re: AnonCVS and -rHEAD

2015-06-09 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/07/15 22:57, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 22:27:05 -0400 Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote: ... Where did you get these source files? Just checked the ones on the mirrors, they do not have such a tag on them. I'll check the CDs..um...not tonight.

Re: AnonCVS and -rHEAD

2015-06-08 Thread trondd
On Sun, June 7, 2015 10:58 pm, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: I am in some agreement with this; it would certainly make it easier not having to change the -rOPENBSD_x_x option in the .cvsrc every time you upgrade. You shouldn't have to put the tag into your cvsrc. Tags are sticky, meaning

Re: AnonCVS and -rHEAD

2015-06-07 Thread bytevolcano
On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 22:27:05 -0400 Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote: On 06/07/15 20:14, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: Hello all, I noticed on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldGetSrc that there is information about preloading the tree, but does not mention that

AnonCVS and -rHEAD

2015-06-07 Thread bytevolcano
Hello all, I noticed on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldGetSrc that there is information about preloading the tree, but does not mention that getting to -current requires -rHEAD at least the first time using 'cvs update' after pre-loading the tree with the source files from the last

Re: AnonCVS and -rHEAD

2015-06-07 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/07/15 20:14, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: Hello all, I noticed on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldGetSrc that there is information about preloading the tree, but does not mention that getting to -current requires -rHEAD at least the first time using 'cvs update' after