You are right. I am using a virtual installation right now until I figure
it all out.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE
network.
From: Daniel OuelletSent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 6:19 PMTo:
misc@openbsd.orgSubject: Re: Compiling BOINC/Seti Home for OpenBSD
On 2013-08-29 Thu 17:02 PM |, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >
> > Wonder why keep running something doing nothing ;)
> >
>
> Still happily married I see. (:>
>
Install a network of multiple machines at home. There'll be lots to do..
--
Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner | http://linkd
On 8/29/2013 4:15 PM, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber mips.inka.de> writes:
>
>> Richard Thornton gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My Sun Blade 100, has a fresh install of 5.3, and its very good, much
>>> better than 5.1; XFCE is very stable and R is much better than prior
>>> ports. y
Christian Weisgerber mips.inka.de> writes:
> Richard Thornton gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My Sun Blade 100, has a fresh install of 5.3, and its very good, much
> > better than 5.1; XFCE is very stable and R is much better than prior
> > ports. you guys did a great job! Now this computer sits runn
On 08/29/13 22:11, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Richard Thornton wrote:
My Sun Blade 100, has a fresh install of 5.3, and its very good, much
better than 5.1; XFCE is very stable and R is much better than prior
ports. you guys did a great job! Now this computer sits running actively,
with not
Richard Thornton wrote:
> My Sun Blade 100, has a fresh install of 5.3, and its very good, much
> better than 5.1; XFCE is very stable and R is much better than prior
> ports. you guys did a great job! Now this computer sits running actively,
> with nothing to do!
Use apm -L or -C and save 10
When you run autoconf/automake (from ports at least), they usually say that
you should export variables like AUTOCONF_VERSION and AUTOMAKE_VERSION to
something like 2.11 or 1.9 or so.
For me:
$ pkg_info | grep auto
autoconf-2.59p3 automatically configure source code on many Un*x
platforms
auto
Richard Thornton gmail.com> writes:
> Is there some sort of special tailoring necessary for OpenBSD?
yes, there is. you need to create port of boinc.
My Sun Blade 100, has a fresh install of 5.3, and its very good, much
better than 5.1; XFCE is very stable and R is much better than prior
ports. you guys did a great job! Now this computer sits running actively,
with nothing to do! So lets run Seti on it, but alas, no recent binary for
OpenBSD
M. Niebergall wrote:
> I'm running [EMAIL PROTECTED] for quite a while and setting it up was quite
> easy. They don't use BOINC but have their own client software. From
> the websites it seams to me that they are doing about the same thing as
> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] pro
> Maybe it is a silly question but: Is it possible to configure the 4
> computers like a cluster and then have one process of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> running on the cluster??
I think that's not possible with their current client, you even need
one client per CPU also on a single machine with the i386
Tasmanian Devil wrote:
>
> And back on topic: I just tried the [EMAIL PROTECTED] client version
> 5.04beta on -current, works fine here with redhat_base installed and
> started with the -openBSD option.
>
> Tas.
Thanks so much for the info...right now i am doing fresh installations
on my 4 compu
generate 100% CPU load
> > (which prevents a possible attack on another software I run). Boinc
> > could do the same for me.
>
> How does 100% load prevent an attack?
It's an attack on hidden services in the Tor network
https://www.torproject.org - you need to stabilize th
M. Niebergall wrote:
> Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
>> I just want to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
>> OpenBSD. I have special interest on this because i have a person near to
>> me (my mother) that has Alzheimer in a very early state. There is a
>
Hi,
They (Boinc) have a source code of the client if you want to make
your own Unix client but...for some reason it does not compile. Before
do a simple configure, it is necessary to run an _autosetup program that
insist to not recognize the tools that are in the system. I am not a
developer
t to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
>> OpenBSD.
>
> Looks like there are also a few unofficial, working ports for OpenBSD:
> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/DownloadOther
>
> Maybe I'll try it myself if this project is useful, I'll r
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
I just want to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
OpenBSD. I have special interest on this because i have a person near to
me (my mother) that has Alzheimer in a very early state. There is a
project ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) which is using this client to
On Dec 18, 2007 8:17 AM, Tasmanian Devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > I just want to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
> > OpenBSD.
But that's only the client, then each project provides binaries, and
often no binaries for OpenBSD.
>Fr
Hello!
> I just want to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
> OpenBSD.
Looks like there are also a few unofficial, working ports for OpenBSD:
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/DownloadOther
Maybe I'll try it myself if this project is useful, I'll read their
w
Hi,
I just want to know if somebody has running any Boinc client on
OpenBSD. I have special interest on this because i have a person near to
me (my mother) that has Alzheimer in a very early state. There is a
project ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) which is using this client to analyze proteins
to find a
On 01/03/06, Bryan Brake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've downloaded the BOINC client for windows and
> am running it with no issues, I was wondering if
> anyone has tried using the OpenBSD version. It
> can be found here...
>
> http://www.lb.shuttle.de/apastron/b
I've downloaded the BOINC client for windows and
am running it with no issues, I was wondering if
anyone has tried using the OpenBSD version. It
can be found here...
http://www.lb.shuttle.de/apastron/boincDown.shtml#opbsd
Does anyone do this? I am sure there is, I just
wanted to fin
With the end of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the start of BONIC I my contributions due
to several reasons.
Although I haven't informed myself well about this stuff, my general
understanding is that BONIC allows any computations to be done on your
computer. While you do opt-in on certain projects the
jared r r spiegel wrote:
> OT, and please don't interpret me as naysaying using spare CPU to
> contribute to distributed computing projects, but i was interested
> to see how much more power my machine ate while running dnetc.
>
> http://www.ice-nine.org/jrrs/meter/
>
> ( taken from a watts-u
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:45:09PM -0500, Chris Zakelj wrote:
> Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
>
> >Is there a need /desire for it?
i've got a small desire
> as they sit around doing absolutely nothing practically
> 24/7, and I think contributing to the science projects represented is a
> worthwhil
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:45:09 -0500
Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry if this comes across as flame bait, that's not my intention.
> >
> >With that out of the way;
> >
> >How about that
Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
>I'm sorry if this comes across as flame bait, that's not my intention.
>
>With that out of the way;
>
>How about that BOINC initiative, http://boinc.berkeley.edu is that
>something that interests anyone else?
>
>I can come to think of p
I'm sorry if this comes across as flame bait, that's not my intention.
With that out of the way;
How about that BOINC initiative, http://boinc.berkeley.edu is that
something that interests anyone else?
I can come to think of plenty of reasons why one would not want a port
of it, I us
28 matches
Mail list logo
