dereck wrote:
Not sure, can this be classify as "sarcasm"? (;> May
be my sarcasm jokes
still need some work!
Daniel
I _am_ a citizen of the USA (American? -not sure- what
is a Canadian if not a North American?), and I've got
the proverbial 2cents that all people from USA have
about things.
J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:35:58 -0500, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >> As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and
> >> then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory
> >> question. This
> Not sure, can this be classify as "sarcasm"? (;> May
> be my sarcasm jokes
> still need some work!
>
> Daniel
I _am_ a citizen of the USA (American? -not sure- what
is a Canadian if not a North American?), and I've got
the proverbial 2cents that all people from USA have
about things. [Insert
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:35:58 -0500, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>J.C. Roberts wrote:
>> As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and
>> then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory
>> question. This is not the first time where your r
J.C. Roberts wrote:
As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and
then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory
question. This is not the first time where your reading skills have
failed to comprehend the meaning of an article and you posted such
q
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
>coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
>the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
>http://www.webpronews.com/experta
On 10/02/06, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertartic
On 2/10/06, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-02-10 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> > coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> > the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
> >
On 2006-02-10 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:10:41 +0530
Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/e
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62-20060209SecurityThroughObscurity
Hi,
BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62-20060209SecurityThroughObscurityThreatenedasMacsBecom
12 matches
Mail list logo
