* ropers rop...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 15:01]:
Maybe --possibly-- my own understanding is sorely lacking. Let me try
to explain. The following requires a non-proportional font:
(...)
OTOH, if you have a dedicated link, maybe your setup looks like this?
external network
|
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:51 PM, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
* ropers rop...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 15:01]:
Maybe --possibly-- my own understanding is sorely lacking. Let me try
to explain. The following requires a non-proportional font:
(...)
OTOH, if you have a dedicated link,
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:13 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
There is some initial code in -current that tries to avoid the system
entering livelock for extended times. It needs a lot of testing so maybe
you should try it out and report back.
sure. Just send me the diffs...
--
Stephan A.
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 09:15 +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:13 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
There is some initial code in -current that tries to avoid the system
entering livelock for extended times. It needs a lot of testing so maybe
you should try it out and
* ropers rop...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 14:17]:
What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you
use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection between the
CARPed machines) or do you send the CARP advertisements over existing
other links? (Which? Please illustrate.)
* ropers rop...@gmail.com [2008-12-12 15:01]:
2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 +0100, ropers wrote:
What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you
use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:56:22PM +, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
We have a simple two-node CARP cluster, each with three em(2)'s and one
fxp0() interface. The setup runs fine since OpenBSD 3.7.
Being part of University Zurich our firewall has a 1GBit uplink to the
central Uni
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:04 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-12-15, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Mon, 15.12.2008 at 10:14:41 +0200, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
IME forwarded packets seem to somehow have a higher priority than
self-originated traffic in most
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:43:43AM +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If the two machines that are part of the same CARP group are connected to
the same switch, and you are experiencing packet loss, then something
really
On 2008-12-16, Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 13:04 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-12-15, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Mon, 15.12.2008 at 10:14:41 +0200, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net
wrote:
IME forwarded packets
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:43:43AM +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If the two machines that are part of the same CARP group are connected to
the same switch, and you are experiencing packet loss, then something really
bad is going on. How many ports does your switch have? Perhaps the total
On Mon, 15.12.2008 at 10:14:41 +0200, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
IME forwarded packets seem to somehow have a higher priority than
self-originated traffic in most OS's; don't know why this is, just a gut
feeling.
I guess that this is true. In any case, if he would be able to maintain
On 2008-12-15, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Mon, 15.12.2008 at 10:14:41 +0200, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
IME forwarded packets seem to somehow have a higher priority than
self-originated traffic in most OS's; don't know why this is, just a gut
feeling.
I guess that
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Stephan A. Rickauer
stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 17:32 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
What's the point on using CARP to send advertisements over a dedicated
link? The dedicated link is typically a cross-over cable
We have a simple two-node CARP cluster, each with three em(2)'s and one
fxp0() interface. The setup runs fine since OpenBSD 3.7.
Being part of University Zurich our firewall has a 1GBit uplink to the
central Uni infrastructure. Recently we have seen that utilizing this
link heavily (e.g. when our
2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch:
We have a simple two-node CARP cluster, each with three em(2)'s and one
fxp0() interface. The setup runs fine since OpenBSD 3.7.
Being part of University Zurich our firewall has a 1GBit uplink to the
central Uni infrastructure.
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 +0100, ropers wrote:
What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you
use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection between the
CARPed machines) or do you send the CARP advertisements over existing
other links? (Which? Please
2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 +0100, ropers wrote:
What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you
use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection between the
CARPed machines) or do you send the CARP
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:57 +0100, ropers wrote:
Maybe --possibly-- my own understanding is sorely lacking. Let me try
to explain. The following requires a non-proportional font:
Is this what your CARP setup looks like?
external network
||
OpenBSD#0
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Stephan A. Rickauer
stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:57 +0100, ropers wrote:
Maybe --possibly-- my own understanding is sorely lacking. Let me try
to explain. The following requires a non-proportional font:
Is this what
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
One can use 'carppeer' to not send multicast but unicast. However, I was
under the impression one still needs to do peering on the same link as
the carp interfaces sit.
Yes, because if you send carp messages on an other (dedicated) link and
the link to the
2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch
We have a simple two-node CARP cluster, each with three em(2)'s and one
fxp0() interface. The setup runs fine since OpenBSD 3.7.
Being part of University Zurich our firewall has a 1GBit uplink to the
central Uni infrastructure.
2008/12/12 ropers rop...@gmail.com
2008/12/12 Stephan A. Rickauer stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 14:11 +0100, ropers wrote:
What link are you sending the CARP advertisements over? E.g. do you
use a dedicated link (separate NICs and cable connection between the
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 17:32 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
What's the point on using CARP to send advertisements over a dedicated
link? The dedicated link is typically a cross-over cable (i.e. used
for pfsync) and hence, in case of a switch port failure (or cable
failure), CARP won't be
24 matches
Mail list logo
